Books > Law > Laws of other jurisdictions & general law > Courts & procedure
|
Buy Now
Judicial Politics in Polarized Times (Paperback)
Loot Price: R796
Discovery Miles 7 960
|
|
Judicial Politics in Polarized Times (Paperback)
Expected to ship within 9 - 15 working days
|
When the Supreme Court upheld the Affordable Care Act, some saw the
decision as a textbook example of neutral judicial decision making,
noting that a Republican Chief Justice joined the Court's
Democratic appointees to uphold most provisions of the ACA. Others
characterized the decision as the latest example of partisan
justice and cited the actions of a bloc of the Court's Republican
appointees, who voted to strike down the statute in its entirety.
Still others argued that the ACA's fate ultimately hinged not on
the Court but on the outcome of the 2012 election. These
interpretations reflect larger stories about judicial politics that
have emerged in polarized America. Are judges neutral legal
umpires, unaccountable partisan activists, or political actors
whose decisions conform to--rather than challenge--the democratic
will?
Drawing on a sweeping survey of litigation on abortion,
affirmative action, gay rights, and gun rights across the Clinton,
Bush, and Obama eras, Thomas M. Keck argues that, while each of
these stories captures part of the significance of judicial
politics in polarized times, each is also misleading. Despite
judges' claims, actual legal decisions are not the politically
neutral products of disembodied legal texts. But neither are judges
"tyrants in robes," undermining democratic values by imposing their
own preferences. Just as often, judges and the public seem to be
pushing in the same direction. As for the argument that the courts
are powerless institutions, Keck shows that their decisions have
profound political effects. And, while advocates on both the left
and right engage constantly in litigation to achieve their ends,
neither side has consistently won. Ultimately, Keck argues, judges
respond not simply as umpires, activists, or political actors, but
in light of distinctive judicial values and practices.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
You might also like..
|