|
Books > Law > Laws of other jurisdictions & general law > Financial, taxation, commercial, industrial law > Financial law > Bankruptcy & insolvency law
|
Buy Now
Gegenseitige Vertrage nach Aufhebung des Insolvenzverfahrens - Anspruche aus gegenseitigen "schwebenden" Vertragen gem. 103 InsO nach vollzogener Schlussverteilung ( 200 Abs. 1 InsO) und rechtskraftig bestatigtem Insolvenzplan ( 258 Abs. 1 InsO) (German, Hardcover, Reprint 2011)
Loot Price: R3,338
Discovery Miles 33 380
|
|
|
Gegenseitige Vertrage nach Aufhebung des Insolvenzverfahrens - Anspruche aus gegenseitigen "schwebenden" Vertragen gem. 103 InsO nach vollzogener Schlussverteilung ( 200 Abs. 1 InsO) und rechtskraftig bestatigtem Insolvenzplan ( 258 Abs. 1 InsO) (German, Hardcover, Reprint 2011)
Series: Schriften zum deutschen, europaischen und internationalen Insolvenzrecht
Expected to ship within 10 - 15 working days
|
As a central provision of the substantive insolvency law, 103 of
the InsO [Insolvency Statute] is of great practical importance.
When an insolvency proceeding is opened, the insolvency
administrator is often required to decide on the type of settlement
for a number of mutual "provisional" contracts, meaning contracts
not completely fulfilled by any party. This applies in particular
for company insolvencies. In the past, the insolvency
administrator's right of election was already a common subject
matter of scholarly works. However, only the legal position within
the insolvency proceeding stood at the center of these
investigations. Therefore, the goal of the present work is the
investigation of the legal position existing between the parties to
the contract after the insolvency proceeding is cancelled either
after complete final distribution or after an insolvency plan comes
into effect. The starting point is the fundamentally tense
relationship between the contractual law of obligations and
substantive insolvency law, and the associated question regarding
the effects of the opening of the proceeding on the claims for
fulfillment that are still open. The author presents the problems
that arise with the application of the latest BGH [German Federal
Supreme Court] judicature, according to which the opening of the
proceeding affects only the "enforceability" of the claims for
fulfillment, and offers solution recommendations. Particularly
relevant in practice are the difficulties that result from the
renunciation of the "forfeiture theory" when the insolvency
reorganization plans go into effect.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.