Books > Social sciences > Politics & government > Political control & freedoms > Human rights
|
Buy Now
Culture in the State Reporting Procedure of the UN Human Rights Treaty Bodies - How the HRC, the CESCR and the CEDAWCee use human rights as a sword to protect and promote culture, and as a shield to protect against harmful culture (Paperback)
Loot Price: R3,046
Discovery Miles 30 460
|
|
Culture in the State Reporting Procedure of the UN Human Rights Treaty Bodies - How the HRC, the CESCR and the CEDAWCee use human rights as a sword to protect and promote culture, and as a shield to protect against harmful culture (Paperback)
Series: Human Rights Research Series, 89
Expected to ship within 12 - 17 working days
|
Ever since the adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human
Rights in 1948 there has been a debate on the issue of universality
and cultural diversity. Nowadays, this debate is not so much framed
in terms of opposites, but more in terms of reconciliation. Under
the international human rights framework, States are allowed to
take cultural particularities into account when implementing the
treaties. The UN human rights treaty bodies which monitor the
implementation of the treaties by States have an important role to
play in ensuring a proper balance between safeguarding the
universality of the rights, while at the same time leaving room for
cultural particularities in the interpretation and implementation
of those rights by States. This book examines how the UN treaty
bodies, in particular the Human Rights Committee, the Committee on
Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the Committee on the
Elimination of Discrimination against Women, fulfil this role. The
research shows that human rights are used as a sword to protect and
safeguard culture and cultural diversity, and as a shield to
protect against harmful aspects of culture. It also looks in-depth
at the dialogue between treaty bodies and States parties, and the
way cultural arguments are dealt with. The study concludes that the
treaty bodies are first and foremost guardians of the universality
of human rights. They use their monitoring role not so much
(actively) to reconcile universality and cultural diversity or to
accommodate cultural variation, but more to determine the limits of
such cultural variation.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.