Wael B. Hallaq boldly argues that the "Islamic state," judged by
any standard definition of what the modern state represents, is
both impossible and inherently self-contradictory. Comparing the
legal, political, moral, and constitutional histories of premodern
Islam and Euro-America, he finds the adoption and practice of the
modern state to be highly problematic for modern Muslims. He also
critiques more expansively modernity's moral predicament, which
renders impossible any project resting solely on ethical
foundations.
The modern state not only suffers from serious legal, political,
and constitutional issues, Hallaq argues, but also, by its very
nature, fashions a subject inconsistent with what it means to be,
or to live as, a Muslim. By Islamic standards, the state's
technologies of the self are severely lacking in moral substance,
and today's Islamic state, as Hallaq shows, has done little to
advance an acceptable form of genuine Shari'a governance. The
Islamists' constitutional battles in Egypt and Pakistan, the
Islamic legal and political failures of the Iranian Revolution, and
similar disappointments underscore this fact. Nevertheless, the
state remains the favored template of the Islamists and the ulama
(Muslim clergymen).
Providing Muslims with a path toward realizing the good life,
Hallaq turns to the rich moral resources of Islamic history. Along
the way, he proves political and other "crises of Islam" are not
unique to the Islamic world nor to the Muslim religion. These
crises are integral to the modern condition of both East and West,
and by acknowledging these parallels, Muslims can engage more
productively with their Western counterparts.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!