Rebuilding societies where conflict has occurred is rarely a
simple process. Where conflict has been accompanied by gross and
systematic violations of human rights, the procedure becomes very
controversial. The traditional debate on "transitional justice"
sought to balance justice, truth, accountability, peace, and
stability. The appearance of impunity for past crimes undermines
confidence in new democratic structures and casts doubt upon
commitments to human rights. Yet the need to consolidate peace
sometimes resulted in reluctance on the part of authorities --both
local and international --to confront suspected perpetrators of
human rights violations, especially when they are a part of a peace
process. Experience in many regions of the world therefore
suggested a tradeoff between peace and justice. But that is
changing. There is a growing consensus that some forms of justice
and accountability are integral to --rather than in tension with
--peace and stability. This volume considers whether we are truly
going beyond the transitional justice debate. It brings together
eminent scholars and practitioners with direct experience in some
of the most challenging cases of international justice, and
illustrates that justice and accountability remain complex, but not
mutually exclusive, ideals.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!