|
Books > Social sciences > Sociology, social studies > Social issues > Social impact of disasters
|
Buy Now
Offsets, Supplemental Appropriations, and the Disaster Relief Fund - Fy1990-Fy2013 (Paperback)
Loot Price: R336
Discovery Miles 3 360
|
|
|
Offsets, Supplemental Appropriations, and the Disaster Relief Fund - Fy1990-Fy2013 (Paperback)
(sign in to rate)
Loot Price R336
Discovery Miles 3 360
Expected to ship within 10 - 17 working days
|
This publication discusses the recent history of offsetting
rescissions in paying for supplemental appropriations to the
Federal Emergency Management Agency's Disaster Relief Fund (DRF).
As Congress has debated the growing size of the budget deficit and
national debt in recent years, efforts have intensified to control
spending and offset the costs of legislation. In 1995, 2011, and
again in 2012, the question of offsetting disaster relief spending
emerged in congressional debate. In 2011, a series of disasters
threatened to deplete the DRF, which is the primary source of
assistance to state and local governments as well as individuals in
the wake of disasters. Hurricane Sandy struck the east coast of the
United States on October 29, 2012. The storm caused tens of
billions of dollars in damage along the coast. As damage estimates
became public in the weeks after the storm, calls for supplemental
appropriations to help pay for recovery efforts were met with calls
for offsets from some quarters. Traditionally, supplemental
disaster relief funding has been treated as emergency spending, not
counted against discretionary budget caps, and not requiring an
offset. However, supplemental spending packages have at times
carried rescissions that have offset, to one degree or another,
their budgetary impact. In some instances, the supplemental
spending packages have contained both appropriations for the DRF
and offsetting rescissions. This publication examines the use of
offsets in connection with supplemental funding for the DRF since
FY1990, reviewing three specific incidences where bills that had an
impact on the level of funding available in the DRF were fully
offset, and points out a number of issues Congress may wish to
consider in this debate. Since FY1990, there has only been one case
in which supplemental funding for the DRF was completely offset by
rescissions.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
You might also like..
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.