More than the citizens of most countries, Americans are either
religious or in jail--or both. But what does it mean when
imprisonment and evangelization actually go hand in hand, or at
least appear to? What do "faith-based" prison programs mean for the
constitutional separation of church and state, particularly when
prisoners who participate get special privileges? In "Prison
Religion," law and religion scholar Winnifred Fallers Sullivan
takes up these and other important questions through a close
examination of a 2005 lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of
a faith-based residential rehabilitation program in an Iowa state
prison.
"Americans United for the Separation of Church and State v.
Prison Fellowship Ministries," a trial in which Sullivan served as
an expert witness, centered on the constitutionality of allowing
religious organizations to operate programs in state-run
facilities. Using the trial as a case study, Sullivan argues that
separation of church and state is no longer possible. Religious
authority has shifted from institutions to individuals, making it
difficult to define religion, let alone disentangle it from the
state. "Prison Religion" casts new light on church-state law, the
debate over government-funded faith-based programs, and the
predicament of prisoners who have precious little choice about what
kind of rehabilitation they receive, if they are offered any at
all.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!