|
Showing 1 - 13 of
13 matches in All Departments
Abdullah An-na'im offers a pioneering exploration of American
Muslim citizenship and identity, arguing against the prevalent
emphasis on majority-minority politics and instead promoting a
shared citizenship that both accommodates and transcends religious
identity. Many scholars and community leaders have called on
American Muslims to engage with or integrate into mainstream
American culture. Such calls tend to assume that there is a
distinctive, monolithic, minority religious identity for American
Muslims. Rejecting the closed categories that determine the
minority status of a particular group and that, in turn, impede
active, engaged citizenship, An-na'im draws attention to the
relational nature of identity, emphasizing a common base of
national membership and advancing a legal approach to a public
recognition of a person's status as citizen. Rather than perceive
themselves or accept being perceived by others as a monolithic
minority, he argues, American Muslims should view themselves as
American citizens who happen to be Muslims. As American citizens,
they share a vast array of identities with other American citizens,
whether ethnic, political, or socio-economic. But none of these
identities qualify or limit their citizenship. An-na'im urges
members of the American Muslim community to take a proactive,
affirmative view of their citizenship in order to realize their
rights fully and fulfill their obligations in social and cultural
as well as political and legal terms. He shows that the freedom to
associate with others in order to engage in civic action to advance
rights and interests is integral to the underlying rationale of
citizenship and not something that must be relinquished to become
an American citizen. What Is an American Muslim? provides acute
insight into the nature of citizenship and identity, the place of
religious affiliation in American society, and what it means to
share in a collective identity.
Radical Conflict addresses conflict at interpersonal and communal,
legal and rhetorical, ethnopolitical, global, and geopolitical
levels. The conflicts analyzed are "radical" because in each some
intense and often prolonged violence takes place. The chapters
address different kinds of violence(s)-physical and gratuitous,
structural and socio-economic, legal and symbolic, all with
significant ill effects and injustices that spiral in all
directions. All share an interest in exploring imaginatively and
speculatively what can be done to attenuate such cycles of
violence. The volume analyzes how recurrent narratives,
mythologies, media(ted) constructions and other discourse(s) of
liberal democratic and authoritarian states play a significant role
in exacerbating or thwarting violence, exposing, escalating,
legitimizing, rationalizing, propagating, but also possibly
mitigating violence in all of its forms. Each contributor provides
a critical interpretation of the status of the conflict under
inquiry, including: a teacher verbally abusing and ridiculing a
student then exposing it in social media; a community torn apart by
environmental disaster; the incommensurate but not incommensurable
conflict between Israelis and Palestinians; the Muslim Brotherhood
and the militarized state(s) of Egypt and Libya; urban discourses
in cyberspace among Moroccan and Maghreb youth that have become
counter-signifying publics against oppression of the state; the
role of media and violence in Zimbabwe's political struggle; the
impact of the Circassian diaspora in global politics especially in
the United States; India's soft power approach to the Kashmir
conflict as a way to capitalize on it through tourism; the
agonistic discourses that pervade the conflict over the Sahara and
deprive Sahrawi people of rights; and how the liberal state is
implicated in the gratuitous violence of ISIL. The volume also
offers a section on the rhetoric of exclusionary laws associated
with intractable conflicts of the abortion conflict, the right to
die controversy, and a Burkean perspective on violence in
Bangladesh. Contributors suggest what can be done conceptually and
politically to mitigate and end violations of those who are most
vulnerable, banished, forgotten, damaged, and often silenced.
"This powerful volume challenges the conventional view that the
concept of human rights is peculiar to the West and, therefore,
inherently alien to the non-Western traditions of third world
countries. This book demonstrates that there is a contextual
legitimacy for the concept of human rights. Virginia A. Leary and
Jack Donnelly discuss the Western cultural origins of international
human rights; David Little, Bassam Tibi, and Ann Elizabeth Mayer
explore Christian and Islamic perspectives on human rights; Rhoda
E. Howard, Claude E. Welch, Jr., and James C. N. Paul examine human
rights in the context of the African nation-state; Kwasi Wiredu,
James Silk, and Francis M. Deng offer African cultural
perspectives; and Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na'im and Richard D. Schwartz
discuss prospects for a cross-cultural approach to human rights. "
In his extensive body of work, Professor Abdullahi Ahmed An-Naim
challenges both historical interpretations of Islamic Sharia and
neo-colonial understanding of human rights. To advance the
rationale of scholarship for social change, An-Naim proposes
advancing the universality of human rights through internal
discourse within Islamic and African societies and cross-cultural
dialogue among human cultures. This book proposes a transformation
from human rights organized around a state determined practice to
one that is focused on a people-centric approach that empowers
individuals to decide how human rights will be understood and
integrated into their communities. Decolonizing Human Rights aims
to illustrate the decisive role of human agency on the subject of
change, without implying that Islamic or any other society are
exceptionally disposed to politically motivated violence and
consequent profound political instability.
In his extensive body of work, Professor Abdullahi Ahmed An-Naim
challenges both historical interpretations of Islamic Sharia and
neo-colonial understanding of human rights. To advance the
rationale of scholarship for social change, An-Naim proposes
advancing the universality of human rights through internal
discourse within Islamic and African societies and cross-cultural
dialogue among human cultures. This book proposes a transformation
from human rights organized around a state determined practice to
one that is focused on a people-centric approach that empowers
individuals to decide how human rights will be understood and
integrated into their communities. Decolonizing Human Rights aims
to illustrate the decisive role of human agency on the subject of
change, without implying that Islamic or any other society are
exceptionally disposed to politically motivated violence and
consequent profound political instability.
African Constitutionalism and the Role of Islam Abdullahi Ahmed
An-Na'im Constitutionalism is steadily becoming the prevalent form
of governance in Africa. But how does constitutionalism deal with
the lingering effects of colonialism? And how does constitutional
law deal with Islamic principles in the region? "African
Constitutionalism and the Role of Islam" seeks to answer these
questions. Constitutional governance has not been, nor will be,
easily achieved, Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na'im argues. But setbacks and
difficulties are to be expected in the process of adaptation and
indigenization of an essentially alien concept--that of of
nation-state--and its role in large-scale political and social
organization. An-Na'im discusses the problems of implementing
constitutionalized forms of government specific to Africa, from
definitional to conceptual and practical issues. The role of Islam
in these endeavors is open to challenge and reformulation, and
should not be taken for granted or assumed to be necessarily
negative or positive, An-Na'im asserts, and he emphasizes the role
of the agency of Muslims in the process of adapting
constitutionalism to the values and practices of their own
societies. By examining the incremental successes that some African
nations have already achieved and An-Na'im reveals the contingent
role that Islam has to play in this process. Ultimately, these
issues will determine the long-term sustainability of
constitutionalism in Africa. Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na'im is Charles
Howard Candler Professor of Law at Emory University School of Law.
He is the author of "Toward an Islamic Reformation" (1990). He is
also editor of several books, including "Human Rights Under African
Constitutions" and "Human Rights in Cross-Cultural Perspectives,"
both available from the University of Pennsylvania Press.
Pennsylvania Studies in Human Rights 2006 216 pages 6 x 9 ISBN
978-0-8122-3962-1 Cloth $65.00s 42.50 World Rights Law, Political
Science Short copy: Constitutionalism is becoming the prevalent
form of governance in Africa. But how does constitutionalism deal
with the lingering effects of colonialism? And how does
constitutional law deal with Islamic principles in the region?
"African Constitutionalism and the Role of Islam" seeks to answer
these questions.
Human Rights Under African Constitutions Realizing the Promise for
Ourselves Edited by Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na'im "The contributors
maintain that a well-informed citizenry is the most powerful (and
likely only) force for creating the political will necessary to
effect change at the national level. There is no sitting on the
fence. . . . The fundamental belief here is that human rights will
only be realized once the African people claim their rights, make
them their own, and demand their respect."--"Netherlands Quarterly
of Human Rights" Some of the most massive and persistent violations
of human rights occur in African nations. In "Human Rights Under
African Constitutions: Realizing the Promise for Ourselves,"
scholars from a wide range of fields present a sober, systematic
assessment of the prospects for legal protection of human rights in
Africa. In a series of detailed and highly contextual studies of
Ethiopia, Ghana, Guinea, Morocco, Mozambique, Nigeria, Rwanda,
Senegal, South Africa, Sudan, and Uganda, experts seek to balance
the socioeconomic and political diversity of these nations while
using the same theoretical framework of legal analysis for each
case study. Standards for human rights protection can be realized
only through direct and strong support from a nation's legal and
political institutions. The contributors to this volume uniformly
conclude that a well-informed and motivated citizenry is the most
powerful force for creating the political will necessary to effect
change at the national level. In addition to a critical evaluation
of the current state of human rights protection in each of these
African nations, the contributors outline existing national
resources available for protecting human rights and provide
recommendations for more effective and practical use of these
resources. Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na'im is Charles Howard Candler
Professor of Law at Emory University and the editor of "Human
Rights in Cross-Cultural Perspectives: A Quest for Consensus," also
available from the University of Pennsylvania Press. Pennsylvania
Studies in Human Rights 2002 448 pages 6 1/8 x 9 1/4 ISBN
978-0-8122-3677-4 Cloth $75.00s 49.00 ISBN 978-0-8122-0110-9 Ebook
$75.00s 49.00 World Rights Law, Political Science Short copy:
Combining theoretical rigor with solid empirical research, "Human
Rights Under African Constitutions" makes an important contribution
for scholars and students of political science, African studies,
and postcolonial history, as well as providing a vital resource for
NGOs and policymakers.
Human rights violations are perpetrated in all parts of the world,
and the universal reaction to such atrocities is overwhelmingly one
of horror and sadness. Yet, as Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na'im and his
contributors attest, our viewpoint is clouded and biased by the
expectations native to our own culture. How do other cultures view
human rights issues? Can an analysis of these issues through
multiple viewpoints, both cross-cultural and indigenous, help us
reinterpret and reconstruct prevailing theories of human rights?
What should be the place of Shari a Islamic religious law in
predominantly Muslim societies of the world? In this ambitious and
topical book, a Muslim scholar and human rights activist envisions
a positive and sustainable role for Shari a, based on a profound
rethinking of the relationship between religion and the secular
state in all societies.
An-Na im argues that the coercive enforcement of Shari a by the
state betrays the Qur an s insistence on voluntary acceptance of
Islam. Just as the state should be secure from the misuse of
religious authority, Shari a should be freed from the control of
the state. State policies or legislation must be based on civic
reasons accessible to citizens of all religions. Showing that
throughout the history of Islam, Islam and the state have normally
been separate, An-Na im maintains that ideas of human rights and
citizenship are more consistent with Islamic principles than with
claims of a supposedly Islamic state to enforce Shari a. In fact,
he suggests, the very idea of an Islamic state is based on European
ideas of state and law, and not Shari a or the Islamic
tradition.
Bold, pragmatic, and deeply rooted in Islamic history and
theology, "Islam" and the Secular State offers a workable future
for the place of Shari a in Muslim societies.
A translation from the Sudanese of Taha's major work in which he
outlines the main features of his teachings. Mahmoud Mohamed Taha
had long been known for his radical reinterpretation of Islam. His
reputation, along with his vigorous opposition to the Islamization
program, ultimately led to his demise
|
|