|
Showing 1 - 2 of
2 matches in All Departments
In 2018, William Lane Craig and Erik J. Wielenberg participated in
a debate at North Carolina State University, addressing the
question: "God and Morality: What is the best account of objective
moral values and duties?" Craig argued that theism provides a sound
foundation for objective morality whereas atheism does not.
Wielenberg countered that morality can be objective even if there
is no God. This book includes the full debate, as well as endnotes
with extended discussions that were not included in the debate. It
also includes five chapters by other philosophers who have written
substantive responses to the debate - J. P. Moreland, David
Baggett, Mark Linville, Wes Morriston, and Michael Huemer. The book
provides crucial resources for better understanding moral realism
and its dependence on, or independence from, theistic foundations.
Key Features A valuable debate about whether or not God is the best
explanation for objective morality, bringing together theists and
atheists working on the same subject who normally are not in
conversation with each other. Includes clear coverage of
ontological and epistemological issues in metaethical theories,
focusing on Divine Command Theory and Non-natural Robust Moral
Realism. Engaging and accessible throughout, making the book well
suited for undergraduate and seminary classrooms.
In 2018, William Lane Craig and Erik J. Wielenberg participated in
a debate at North Carolina State University, addressing the
question: "God and Morality: What is the best account of objective
moral values and duties?" Craig argued that theism provides a sound
foundation for objective morality whereas atheism does not.
Wielenberg countered that morality can be objective even if there
is no God. This book includes the full debate, as well as endnotes
with extended discussions that were not included in the debate. It
also includes five chapters by other philosophers who have written
substantive responses to the debate - J. P. Moreland, David
Baggett, Mark Linville, Wes Morriston, and Michael Huemer. The book
provides crucial resources for better understanding moral realism
and its dependence on, or independence from, theistic foundations.
Key Features A valuable debate about whether or not God is the best
explanation for objective morality, bringing together theists and
atheists working on the same subject who normally are not in
conversation with each other. Includes clear coverage of
ontological and epistemological issues in metaethical theories,
focusing on Divine Command Theory and Non-natural Robust Moral
Realism. Engaging and accessible throughout, making the book well
suited for undergraduate and seminary classrooms.
|
You may like...
Poldark: Series 1-2
Aidan Turner, Eleanor Tomlinson, …
Blu-ray disc
(1)
R55
Discovery Miles 550
Merry Christmas
Mariah Carey, Walter Afanasieff, …
CD
R122
R112
Discovery Miles 1 120
Ab Wheel
R209
R149
Discovery Miles 1 490
|