|
Showing 1 - 4 of
4 matches in All Departments
This book investigates the extent to which various scholarly labels
are appropriate for the work of Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. As Louis
Menand wrote, "Holmes has been called a formalist, a positivist, a
utilitarian, a realist, a historicist, a pragmatist, (not to
mention a nihilist)." Each of the eight chapters investigates one
label, analyzes the secondary texts that support the use of the
term to characterize Holmes's philosophy, and takes a stand on
whether or not the category is appropriate for Holmes by assessing
his judicial and nonjudicial publications, including his books,
articles, and posthumously published correspondences. The thrust of
the collection as a whole, nevertheless, bends toward the stance
that Holmes is a pragmatist in his jurisprudence, ethics, and
politics. The final chapter, by Susan Haack, makes that case
explicitly. Edited by Seth Vannatta, this book will be of
particular interest to students and faculty working in law,
jurisprudence, philosophy, intellectual history, American Studies,
political science, and constitutional theory.
This book investigates the extent to which various scholarly labels
are appropriate for the work of Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. As Louis
Menand wrote, "Holmes has been called a formalist, a positivist, a
utilitarian, a realist, a historicist, a pragmatist, (not to
mention a nihilist)." Each of the eight chapters investigates one
label, analyzes the secondary texts that support the use of the
term to characterize Holmes's philosophy, and takes a stand on
whether or not the category is appropriate for Holmes by assessing
his judicial and nonjudicial publications, including his books,
articles, and posthumously published correspondences. The thrust of
the collection as a whole, nevertheless, bends toward the stand
that Holmes is a pragmatist in his jurisprudence, ethics, and
politics. The final chapter makes that case explicitly. Edited by
Seth Vannatta, this book will be of particular interest to students
and faculty working in law, jurisprudence, philosophy, intellectual
history, American Studies, political science, and constitutional
theory.
In this unique book, Alexander Lian, a practicing commercial
litigator, advances the thesis that the most famous article in
American jurisprudence, Oliver Wendell Holmes's "The Path of the
Law," presents Holmes's leading ideas on legal education. Through
meticulous analysis, Lian explores Holmes's fundamental ideas on
law and its study. He puts "The Path of the Law" within the
trajectory of Holmes's jurisprudence, from earliest scholarship to
The Common Law to the occasional pieces Holmes wrote or delivered
after joining the U.S. Supreme Court. Lian takes a close look at
the reactions "The Path of the Law" has evoked, both positive and
negative, and restates the essay's core teachings for today's legal
educators. Lian convincingly shows that Holmes's "theory of legal
study" broke down artificial barriers between theory and practice.
For contemporary legal educators, Stereoscopic Law reformulates
Holmes's fundamental message that the law must been seen and taught
three-dimensionally.
In this unique book, Alexander Lian, a practicing commercial
litigator, advances the thesis that the most famous article in
American jurisprudence, Oliver Wendell Holmes's "The Path of the
Law," presents Holmes's leading ideas on legal education. Through
meticulous analysis, Lian explores Holmes's fundamental ideas on
law and its study. He puts "The Path of the Law" within the
trajectory of Holmes's jurisprudence, from earliest scholarship to
The Common Law to the occasional pieces Holmes wrote or delivered
after joining the U.S. Supreme Court. Lian takes a close look at
the reactions "The Path of the Law" has evoked, both positive and
negative, and restates the essay's core teachings for today's legal
educators. Lian convincingly shows that Holmes's "theory of legal
study" broke down artificial barriers between theory and practice.
For contemporary legal educators, Stereoscopic Law reformulates
Holmes's fundamental message that the law must been seen and taught
three-dimensionally.
|
|