|
|
Showing 1 - 5 of
5 matches in All Departments
The election of Barack Obama as the 44th president of the United
States has opened a new chapter in the country's long and often
tortured history of inter-racial and inter-ethnic relations. Many
relished in the inauguration of the country's first African
American president - an event foreseen by another White House
aspirant, Senator Robert Kennedy, four decades earlier. What could
have only been categorized as a dream in the wake of Brown vs.
Board of Education was now a reality. Some dared to contemplate a
post-racial America. Still, soon after Obama's election a small but
persistent faction questioned his eligibility to hold office; they
insisted that Obama was foreign-born. Following the Civil Rights
battles of the 20th century hate speech, at least in public, is no
longer as free flowing as it had been. Perhaps xenophobia, in a
land of immigrants, is the new rhetorical device to assail what
which is non-white and hence un-American. Furthermore, recent
debates about immigration and racial profiling in Arizona along
with the battle over rewriting of history and civics textbooks in
Texas suggest that a post-racial America is a long way off. What
roles do race, ethnicity, ancestry, immigration status, locus of
birth play in the public and private conversations that defy and
reinforce existing conceptions of what it means to be American?
This book exposes the changing and persistent notions of American
identity in the age of Obama. Amilcar Antonio Barreto and Richard
L. O'Bryant, and an outstanding line up of contributors examine
Obama's election and reelection as watershed phenomena that will be
exploited by the president's supporters and detractors to engage in
different forms of narrating the American national saga. Despite
the potential for major changes in rhetorical mythmaking, they
question whether American society has changed substantively.
The election of Barack Obama as the 44th president of the United
States has opened a new chapter in the country's long and often
tortured history of inter-racial and inter-ethnic relations. Many
relished in the inauguration of the country's first African
American president - an event foreseen by another White House
aspirant, Senator Robert Kennedy, four decades earlier. What could
have only been categorized as a dream in the wake of Brown vs.
Board of Education was now a reality. Some dared to contemplate a
post-racial America. Still, soon after Obama's election a small but
persistent faction questioned his eligibility to hold office; they
insisted that Obama was foreign-born. Following the Civil Rights
battles of the 20th century hate speech, at least in public, is no
longer as free flowing as it had been. Perhaps xenophobia, in a
land of immigrants, is the new rhetorical device to assail what
which is non-white and hence un-American. Furthermore, recent
debates about immigration and racial profiling in Arizona along
with the battle over rewriting of history and civics textbooks in
Texas suggest that a post-racial America is a long way off. What
roles do race, ethnicity, ancestry, immigration status, locus of
birth play in the public and private conversations that defy and
reinforce existing conceptions of what it means to be American?
This book exposes the changing and persistent notions of American
identity in the age of Obama. Amilcar Antonio Barreto, Richard L.
O'Bryant, and an outstanding line up of contributors examine
Obama's election and reelection as watershed phenomena that will be
exploited by the president's supporters and detractors to engage in
different forms of narrating the American national saga. Despite
the potential for major changes in rhetorical mythmaking, they
question whether American society has changed substantively.
The Impact of Natural Disasters on Systemic Political and Social
Inequities in the U.S. examines how natural disasters impact social
inequality in the United States. The contributors cover topics such
as criminal justice, demographics, economics, history, political
science, and sociology to show how effects of natural disasters
vary by social and economic class in the United States. This volume
studies social and political mechanisms in disaster response and
relief that enable natural disasters to worsen inequalities in
America and offers potential solutions.
In 1991, the Puerto Rican government abolished bilingualism,
claiming that "Spanish only" was necessary to protect the culture
from North American influences. A few years later bilingualism was
restored and English was promoted in public schools.This revised
edition of The Politics of Language in Puerto Rico is updated with
an emphasis on the dual arenas where the language controversy
played out-Puerto Rico and the United States Congress-and includes
new data on the connections between language and conflicting
notions of American identity. This book shows that officials in
both San Juan and Washington, along with English-first groups, used
these language laws as weapons in the battle over U.S.-Puerto Rican
relations and the volatile debate over statehood.
This is the first book in English to analyze the controversial
language policies passed by the Puerto Rican government in the
1990s. It is also the first to explore the connections between
language and cultural identity and politics on the Caribbean
island.Shortly after the U.S. invasion of Puerto Rico in 1898, both
English and Spanish became official languages of the territory. In
1991, the Puerto Rican government abolished bilingualism, claiming
that ""Spanish only"" was necessary to protect the culture from
North American influences. A few years later bilingualism was
restored and English was promoted in public schools, with
supporters asserting that the dual languages symbolized the
island's commitment to live in harmony with the United States.
While the islanders' sense of ethnic pride was growing, economic
dependency enticed them to maintain close ties to the United
States. This book shows that officials in both San Juan and
Washington, along with English-first groups, used the language laws
as weapons in the battle over U.S.-Puerto Rican relations and the
volatile debate over statehood. It will be of interest to
linguists, political scientists, students of contemporary cultural
politics, and political activists in discussions of nationalism in
multilingual communities.
|
|