|
|
Showing 1 - 19 of
19 matches in All Departments
THIS 64 PAGE ARTICLE WAS EXTRACTED FROM THE BOOK: Bechamp or
Pasteur: A Lost Chapter in the History of Biology, by Douglas Hume.
To purchase the entire book, please order ISBN 1564599272.
THIS 64 PAGE ARTICLE WAS EXTRACTED FROM THE BOOK: Bechamp or
Pasteur: A Lost Chapter in the History of Biology, by Douglas Hume.
To purchase the entire book, please order ISBN 1564599272.
THIS 64 PAGE ARTICLE WAS EXTRACTED FROM THE BOOK: Bechamp or
Pasteur: A Lost Chapter in the History of Biology, by Douglas Hume.
To purchase the entire book, please order ISBN 1564599272.
What Dr. Bechamp is describing is a foundational concept. According
to his experiments and observations, these tiny particles he named
'microzymas' have an active role in sustaining and also in
terminating life. Using the syllable '-zyme' (now also used in the
word 'enzyme') to indicate this principle of causing 'fermentation'
(activity) Bechamp searched for and found the same particles and
activity even in limestone, apparently from the ancient shelled
creatures whose bodies were incorporated into the stone. They still
retained their activity. The only factor that stopped these
particles was heat. As Dr. Bechamp expressed it, "Life is the prey
of life" i.e. as the organizing life-principle of a complex body
ceases to operate, the microzymas take up their role of breaking it
down and returning its elements to nature to be taken up by other
life forms. Unfortunately Pasteur first tried to steal Bechamp's
work, then when he objected, Pasteur set out to use his political
clout to destroy the career and reputation of the great French
doctor. This is why we don't hear much about this alternative
school of science. A complete history of this scientific and
political conflict was written early in the 20th century, by a
woman doing meticulous research into the historical records of the
French Academy of Science. Please see Bechamp or Pasteur?: A Lost
Chapter in the History of Biology by Ethel Hume. Her book is
another must-read for grasping the significance of this concept and
why certain interests wanted it deleted from the scientific record.
The same discovery of tiny active particles was repeated in the
20th century, first by Royal Rife using a very complex microscope
to observe the particles changing into four different types. Later,
working independently and with a different powerful microscope of
his own invention, the French scientist Gaston Naessens observed
these particles morph into sixteen different forms including
bacterial and fungal. The significance of this is that what we
think of as pathogens are not necessarily 'infectious' (or
'exogenous', or from outside), but can be 'endogenous' (from
within). Christopher Bird's detailed account of this concept which
has been named "pleomorphism" - and which is still being attacked
by the chemical-based medical authorities - is in his very
instructive book The Persecution and Trial of Gaston Naessens: The
True Story of the Efforts to Suppress an Alternative Treatment for
Cancer, AIDS, and Other Immunologically Based Diseases. Like Ethel
Hume, the late Christopher Bird was fluent in French, and attended
the French-language trial in Quebec. A version of this story in
French is titled Le Galilee du microscope" (Galileo of the
Microscope). In reference to the infamous behaviour of Galileo's
critics who refused to look into his telescope, the critics of
Naessens refused to look through this powerful microscope that
could resolve images in angstrom resolution, without first killing
or staining the samples. As the science of "psychoneuroimmunology"
begins to gain traction in clinical practice, I entertain the hope
that the role of the endogenous (driven by the psyche) aspects of
dis-ease will become more respected. (For a detailed account of
that field of understanding I'd recommend reading Dr. Gabor Mate's
book When the Body Says No (also in print).) Then perhaps Bechamp
may be restored to the status he deserves as a medical pioneer far
ahead of his time.
This is an EXACT reproduction of a book published before 1923. This
IS NOT an OCR'd book with strange characters, introduced
typographical errors, and jumbled words. This book may have
occasional imperfections such as missing or blurred pages, poor
pictures, errant marks, etc. that were either part of the original
artifact, or were introduced by the scanning process. We believe
this work is culturally important, and despite the imperfections,
have elected to bring it back into print as part of our continuing
commitment to the preservation of printed works worldwide. We
appreciate your understanding of the imperfections in the
preservation process, and hope you enjoy this valuable book.
|
|