|
Showing 1 - 3 of
3 matches in All Departments
The legal principle of ne bis in idem restricts the possibility of
a defendant being prosecuted repeatedly on the basis of the same
offence, act, or facts. Although few would dispute its relevance to
the regulation of transnational justice, there is as yet no
universally accepted ne bis in idem rule or provision available at
the international level, although it is to some extent recognized
and respected in Europe, via Article 54 of the Convention on the
Implementation of the Schengen Agreement (CISA; integrated into EU
law by the Treaty of Amsterdam) and Article 4 of the 7th Protocol
of the European Convention on Human Rights. The relevant case law
of the ECJ and the ECtHR has implications for the systems of
criminal and administrative law in European states, as well as for
the interpretation and application of the principle in some areas
of EU law, such as competition law. This book analyses these
important implications, fulfilling a genuine need to assess the
need for - and the prospects of - a 'European' ne bis in idem
principle. The author identifies and describes obstacles that stand
in the way of a single, autonomous, and uniformly applicable
general ne bis in idem principle of EU law - differently worded
provisions within the different 'European' frameworks; a measure of
confusion and conflict within the case law of the Community courts;
positive conflicts of jurisdiction and the allocation of cases
between the Member States; and, the vague exception possibilities
laid down in Article 55 CISA. Among the issues examined are the
following: the problem of defining the substance of the guarantee;
scope of application of the guarantee; mechanisms for the
coordination of the allocation of cases between Member State
authorities and the role of Eurojust; developments in enhanced
cooperation in criminal matters; fining in competition law; and,
extraterritoriality and convergence issues. The author approaches
the subject along two lines: first by way of conceptual analysis,
and then through a jurisprudential analysis of the relevant case
law of the ECJ and the ECtHR, offering well-informed, insightful
recommendations and suggestions along the way. As the first
contribution to an in-depth understanding of the fundamental
problems and issues associated with the interpretation and
application of a 'European' ne bis in idem principle, this study
takes a giant step towards developing and refining the principle
within the legal order of the EU. Jurists and legal scholars
concerned with the foundations of European law will welcome the
book, as will competition law practitioners and officials concerned
with transnational police and judicial enforcement.
Questions of the application and interpretation of the ne bis in
idem principle in EU law continue to surface in the case law of
different European courts. The primary purpose of this book is to
provide guidance and to address important issues in connection with
the ne bis in idem principle in EU law. The development of the ne
bis in idem principle in the EU legal order illustrates the
difficulty of reconciling pluralism with the need for doctrinal
coherence, and highlights the tensions between the requirements of
effectiveness and the protection of fundamental rights in EU law.
The ne bis in idem principle is a 'litmus test' of fundamental
rights protection in the EU. This book explores the principle, and
the way the Court of Justice of the European Union has interpreted
it, in the context of competition law and the areas of freedom,
security and justice, human rights law and tax law.
Questions of the application and interpretation of the ne bis in
idem principle in EU law continue to surface in the case law of
different European courts. The primary purpose of this book is to
provide guidance and to address important issues in connection with
the ne bis in idem principle in EU law. The development of the ne
bis in idem principle in the EU legal order illustrates the
difficulty of reconciling pluralism with the need for doctrinal
coherence, and highlights the tensions between the requirements of
effectiveness and the protection of fundamental rights in EU law.
The ne bis in idem principle is a 'litmus test' of fundamental
rights protection in the EU. This book explores the principle, and
the way the Court of Justice of the European Union has interpreted
it, in the context of competition law and the areas of freedom,
security and justice, human rights law and tax law.
|
|