|
Showing 1 - 18 of
18 matches in All Departments
It has been a commonly held historical belief that in the second
half of the 17th century, the Spanish army suffered such
catastrophic defeats that it effectively brought about the collapse
of the state as a major player on the European stage. The wars,
fought out in Catalonia, Franche Comte, Flanders and Italy,
resulted in a series of substantial defeats for Spain. The forces
of Louis XIV carried all before them. Spain's ability to fend off
the French monarch's assault was not eased by the fact that, at the
same time, Spain had faced the Portuguese in the Iberian Peninsula,
the English in the Caribbean, the Algerians in Melilla, as well as
further insidious French assault in southern Italy and in the
colonies. In this regard, it would be more correct to consider this
age as a period of resilience, rather than military defeats.
Equally superficially, the Portuguese War of Independence too was
considered as a peripheral conflict of minor interest, while it
also involved France and England in addition to the countries
directly concerned. The story, organisation, uniforms and equipment
of the Spanish and Portuguese armies of this age are dealt for the
first time in a single book, after archive's sources and
unpublished iconography.
During the 17th century, Europe experienced only four years of
general peace: 1610 and 1680-82. This scenario of almost continuous
strife provided the terrain for the rise of the standing
professional armies. The states were eager to avoid a repetition of
the chaos and destruction that had plagued Europe during the Thirty
Years' War, and therefore invested in these larger, more powerful
armies to reduce the risks and costs of war. Some historians
considered this act to be one of the most important institutional
developments of the early modern world. The permanent armies became
an organic feature of the Old Regime, a symbol of its power and
strength, the means by which the prince could defend his interest
and play an active role in the International policy. In the opinion
of many contemporaries, it offered an opportunity to exploit
strategic knowledge, to examine the effectiveness of military
tactics and become aware of the increasing importance of the
overall organization of the army. It would allow the military
classes to occupy a significant place alongside the major European
powers. In this scenario, the Imperial Army represents an
interesting laboratory, which involved the multicultural Habsburg's
domains and the Holy Roman-Germanic Empire in the birth of one of
the major standing army of Europe. The history, organization,
uniforms and ensigns of the Imperial army and the 'Reichsarmee' are
here presented for the first time in a single book, with a lot of
unpublished iconography and data.
Prolific Italian artist and author, Bruno Mugnai introduces the
Dutch Army of the third quarter of the 17th century in the first of
a new 8 volume series that covers the armies of early years of
Louis XIV reign. France and the United Provinces represented
opposite models of state government during the 17th century. The
contrary nature of their political structure led to conflict on
several occasions during this period. Military Historians have
focused research onto the final phase of the conflicts such as the
Wars of the Grand Alliance and the Spanish Succession, which
coincides with the beginning of the long decline for both
countries. Mugnai examines the evolution of the Dutch Army, its
equipment, weapons and tactics, along with its uniforms and flags
and ensigns. The book is lavishly illustrated and contains 8
specially commissioned colour plates that depicts the Army of
United Provinces during the nation's 'Golden Age'.
It was a commonplace that Italy offers little of interest to
military historians after the full flower of the Renaissance, and
that it had been deservedly forgotten. Italian Risorgimento
desperately wanted to repudiate the values of the previous
centuries. In place of a politically fragmented and militarily weak
collection of small states, in the thrall of Counter-Reformation
Catholicism, the 19th century historians dreamed of a united,
secular, industrial and well armed country that could withstand
comparison to France, England and Germany. The lack of interest on
this period increased even more under the fascist regime, which
preferred to elude a period in which Italian states appeared as
political entities dominated by foreign interference, and focusing
on the unreal Imperial myth reworked from the vestiges of the
monuments of ancient Rome. However, in the 17th century Italy was
the third-largest country by population in Europe, after France and
Germany, passing into second position for a century after 1700.
Northern as well as southern Italy constituted a key place in the
strategic duel between Spain and France, and the Peninsula lied on
the front line in the struggle against the Ottoman Empire.
Moreover, Italian states constituted good examples of fairly
efficient governance machines, which developed many matters,
included the 'Military'. Some of these states experienced long
periods of wars, to the point that the claim regarding social
elites progressively demilitarized to an unequalled extent anywhere
else in Europe should be considered no longer valid.
A considerable part of the military history of the 17th century is
dominated by the conflict between the Christian powers and the
Ottoman Empire. Much has been written about the politics and the
campaigns that led to the siege of Vienna in 1683 and the defeat
suffered by the Sultan's armies, while, until today, there are
relatively few studies on the long war that opposed Venice to the
Ottoman Empire. The importance of the event in the context of
politics not only of the Mediterranean, but of all Europe, is
easily found in the number of chancelleries involved in the war,
both directly on the battlefield or in diplomatic negotiations. The
strategic duel involved the belligerents in the control of the
supply routes, and the metropolitan territory of both sides
remained almost excluded from military operations. It was a
conflict where the logistics organization and the ability to supply
the armies made the difference, similar in many ways to the
campaigns in the south-western Pacific during the Second World War.
It could be said that the Cretan War was the first conflict of
contemporary age, but fought with the means of the 17thcentury.
Other aspects make this conflict a topic of great interest. Just
remember that in the last years of war, men from almost all the
countries of Europe were concentrated in Crete - and for the
Ottomans also from Asia and Africa. Even with regard to the
reconstruction of military clothing and equipment, this work
finally opens a window on a period not very frequented by
researchers, although these are years in which great transformation
took place both in the armaments and in the development of new
combat tactics. The different types of soldiers involved in the
conflict have been illustrated with care in colour plates, based on
the most significant coeval examples and employing several
unpublished sources.
|
|