|
Showing 1 - 3 of
3 matches in All Departments
This is an innovative study of 300 delinquent boys in a medium
security institution and after their release. This longitudinal
field experiment shows how peers affect the rehabilitation of
different group members, how staff use those influences to lead to
prosocial change after release from the institution, and how
different behavior, values, and feelings improved. This
well-designed research has broad implications for use in graduate
courses in sociology, criminology and penology, social and
personality psychology, and group dynamics. The book is equally
useful to administrators and policymakers dealing with delinquents
and individuals with behavior problems. The field experiment was
devised with both practical and theoretical purposes in mind, to
develop corrective programs for delinquent youth and to test social
science hypotheses in the context of a longitudinal experimental
research design. The study presents a typology of delinquent boys
that guides differential treatment, focuses on peer group and staff
influences, and identifies factors in residential treatment and in
the open community that facilitate prosocial reentry. The findings
test hypotheses about group and staff impact on anti-social
behavior within the institution and after release.
The PROSPER study is the premier study of adolescent peer networks
in the world, with a scope of over 12,000 youth in 28 school
districts, and with 8 annual waves of data collection covering
grades 6-12. Research output from the PROSPER study has provided
extensive new insights in the areas of adolescent development,
risky behaviors, and social networks. Through the lens of the
PROSPER study, Teen Friendship Networks, Development, and Risky
Behavior describes the many ways that adolescent friendship
networks channel and facilitate the spread of adolescent substance
use, delinquent behaviors, mental health problems, educational
success, romantic relationships, and future development.
Introductory chapters explain the theories of adolescent
development and the elements of peer network science. The chapters
of the main part of the book each focus on a domain of adolescent
behavior, providing background on the topic and highlighting the
contribution of the PROSPER study to understanding the way teen
friendships operate to promote initiation or diffusion of the
behavior or attribute. With coverage of major themes such as the
ways that teens select friends based on particular characteristics
or similarity between them, and the ways that friends, once
selected, influence each other, as well as discussion of how
friendship and network patterns are linked to the uptake and spread
of positive prevention messages, Teen Friendship Networks,
Development, and Risky Behavior will appeal to researchers and
students across several fields.
In the decade after high school, young people continue to rely on
their families in many ways--sometimes for financial support,
sometimes for help with child care, and sometimes for continued
shelter. But what about those young people who confront special
difficulties during this period, many of whom can count on little
help from their families?
"On Your Own Without a Net" documents the special challenges facing
seven vulnerable populations during the transition to adulthood:
foster care youth, youth involved in the juvenile justice system,
youth formerly in the criminal justice system, runaway and homeless
youth, special education students, young people in the mental
health system, and youth with physical disabilities. During
adolescence, government programs have been a major part of their
lives, yet eligibility for most programs typically ends between the
ages of eighteen and twenty-one. This critical volume shows the
unfortunate repercussions of this termination of support and points
out the issues that must be addressed to improve these young
people's chances of becoming successful adults. As a result," On
Your Own Without a Net" will find a welcome home on the desks of
policy makers, educators of teens and young adults, and academics
across the social sciences.
|
|