Welcome to Loot.co.za!
Sign in / Register |Wishlists & Gift Vouchers |Help | Advanced search
|
Your cart is empty |
|||
Showing 1 - 5 of 5 matches in All Departments
The "happiness agenda" is a worldwide movement that claims that happiness is the highest good, happiness can be measured, and public policy should promote happiness. Against Happiness is a thorough and powerful critique of this program, revealing the flaws of its concept of happiness and advocating a renewed focus on equality and justice. Written by an interdisciplinary team of authors, this book provides both theoretical and empirical analysis of the limitations of the happiness agenda. The authors emphasize that this movement draws on a parochial, Western-centric philosophical basis and demographic sample. They show that happiness defined as subjective satisfaction or a surplus of positive emotions bears little resemblance to the richer and more nuanced concepts of the good life found in many world traditions. Cross-cultural philosophy, comparative theology, and social and cultural psychology all teach that cultures and subcultures vary in how much value they place on life satisfaction or feeling happy. Furthermore, the ideas promoted by the happiness agenda can compete with rights, justice, sustainability, and equality-and even conceal racial and gender injustice. Against Happiness argues that a better way forward requires integration of cross-cultural philosophical, ethical, and political thought with critical social science. Ultimately, the authors contend, happiness should be a secondary goal-worth pursuing only if it is contingent on the demands of justice.
The "happiness agenda" is a worldwide movement that claims that happiness is the highest good, happiness can be measured, and public policy should promote happiness. Against Happiness is a thorough and powerful critique of this program, revealing the flaws of its concept of happiness and advocating a renewed focus on equality and justice. Written by an interdisciplinary team of authors, this book provides both theoretical and empirical analysis of the limitations of the happiness agenda. The authors emphasize that this movement draws on a parochial, Western-centric philosophical basis and demographic sample. They show that happiness defined as subjective satisfaction or a surplus of positive emotions bears little resemblance to the richer and more nuanced concepts of the good life found in many world traditions. Cross-cultural philosophy, comparative theology, and social and cultural psychology all teach that cultures and subcultures vary in how much value they place on life satisfaction or feeling happy. Furthermore, the ideas promoted by the happiness agenda can compete with rights, justice, sustainability, and equality-and even conceal racial and gender injustice. Against Happiness argues that a better way forward requires integration of cross-cultural philosophical, ethical, and political thought with critical social science. Ultimately, the authors contend, happiness should be a secondary goal-worth pursuing only if it is contingent on the demands of justice.
The pursuit of happiness is a defining theme of the modern era. But
what if people aren't very good at it? That is the question posed
by this book, the first comprehensive philosophical treatment of
happiness, understood here as a psychological phenomenon. Engaging
heavily with the scientific literature, Dan Haybron argues that
people probably know less about their own welfare, and may be less
effective at securing it, than common belief has it. This is
largely because human nature is surprisingly ill-suited to the
pursuit of happiness. For the happiness that counts for well-being
is not a matter of what we think about our lives, but of the
quality of our emotional conditions. Yet our emotional lives are
remarkably difficult to grasp. Moreover, we make a variety of
systematic errors in the pursuit of happiness. These considerations
suggest that we should rethink traditional assumptions about the
good life and the good society. For instance, the pursuit of
happiness may be primarily a matter of social context rather than
personal choice.
Happiness is an everyday term in our lives, and most of us strive
to be happy. But defining happiness can be difficult.
The pursuit of happiness is a defining theme of the modern era. But
what if people aren't very good at it? That is the question posed
by this book, the first comprehensive philosophical treatment of
happiness, understood here as a psychological phenomenon. Engaging
heavily with the scientific literature, Dan Haybron argues that
people probably know less about their own welfare, and may be less
effective at securing it, than common belief has it. This is
largely because human nature is surprisingly ill-suited to the
pursuit of happiness. For the happiness that counts for well-being
is not a matter of what we think about our lives, but of the
quality of our emotional conditions. Yet our emotional lives are
remarkably difficult to grasp. Moreover, we make a variety of
systematic errors in the pursuit of happiness. These considerations
suggest that we should rethink traditional assumptions about the
good life and the good society. For instance, the pursuit of
happiness may be primarily a matter of social context rather than
personal choice.
|
You may like...
|