|
|
Showing 1 - 6 of
6 matches in All Departments
The Affordable Care Act (ACA) contained a threat that any state
refusing to set up a health insurance exchange would lose control
to the federal government. Republicans had supported the concept
before it became part of Obamacare, and so virtually every state
was expected to cooperate and implement this core part of the law
through which millions would receive financial assistance to buy
health insurance. However, 34 states refused to participate, using
their flexibility as an opportunity to try to bring down the entire
law. This is a stunning miscalculation by the Obama administration.
This book tells the story of what happened in the final two states
to choose state control (Idaho and New Mexico) and the two that
came the closest but did not (Michigan and Mississippi). Contrary
to how it is typically described in the media, the most intense
split was not between Republicans and Democrats, but within the
Republican Party. Governors were the most important people in the
fight over exchanges, but did not always get their way. The Tea
Party was amazingly successful at defeating the most powerful
interest groups. State-level and national conservative think tanks
were important allies to the Tea Party. The relative power of these
groups was shaped by differences in institutional design and
procedures, such as whether a state has term limits and the length
of legislative sessions. Opposition was more easily overcome in
states whose conditions facilitated the development of legislative
"pockets of expertise." This is a dramatic example of opponents
using federalism to block national reform and serves as a warning
of the challenge of inducing state cooperation in other policy
domains such as the environment and education.
The Affordable Care Act (ACA) contained a threat that any state
refusing to set up a health insurance exchange would lose control
to the federal government. Republicans had supported the concept
before it became part of Obamacare, and so virtually every state
was expected to cooperate and implement this core part of the law
through which millions would receive financial assistance to buy
health insurance. However, 34 states refused to participate, using
their flexibility as an opportunity to try to bring down the entire
law. This is a stunning miscalculation by the Obama administration.
This book tells the story of what happened in the final two states
to choose state control (Idaho and New Mexico) and the two that
came the closest but did not (Michigan and Mississippi). Contrary
to how it is typically described in the media, the most intense
split was not between Republicans and Democrats, but within the
Republican Party. Governors were the most important people in the
fight over exchanges, but did not always get their way. The Tea
Party was amazingly successful at defeating the most powerful
interest groups. State-level and national conservative think tanks
were important allies to the Tea Party. The relative power of these
groups was shaped by differences in institutional design and
procedures, such as whether a state has term limits and the length
of legislative sessions. Opposition was more easily overcome in
states whose conditions facilitated the development of legislative
"pockets of expertise." This is a dramatic example of opponents
using federalism to block national reform and serves as a warning
of the challenge of inducing state cooperation in other policy
domains such as the environment and education.
|
You may like...
But God
Donna L Francek Ternes
Hardcover
R642
R577
Discovery Miles 5 770
Spider!
Carrie Hyatt
Hardcover
R526
Discovery Miles 5 260
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.