|
Showing 1 - 21 of
21 matches in All Departments
For fifty years, The Supreme Court Review has been lauded for
providing authoritative discussion of the Court's most significant
decisions. The Review is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme
Court and its work, keeping up on the forefront of the origins,
reforms, and interpretations of American law. Recent volumes have
considered such issues as post-9/11 security, the 2000 presidential
election, cross burning, federalism and state sovereignty, failed
Supreme Court nominations, the battles concerning same-sex
marriage, and numerous First and Fourth amendment cases.
For more than fifty years, The Supreme Court Review has won acclaim
for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the
implications of the Court's most significant decisions. The Supreme
Court Review is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court
and its work, keeping up on the forefront of the origins, reforms,
and interpretations of American law. It is written by and for legal
academics, judges, political scientists, journalists, historians,
economists, policy planners, and sociologists.
For fifty years, "The Supreme Court Review" has been lauded for
providing authoritative discussion of the court's most significant
decisions. The Review is an indepth annual critique of the Supreme
Court and its work, keeping up on the forefront of the origins,
reforms, and interpretations of American law. Recent volumes have
considered such issues as post-9/11 security, the 2000 presidential
election, cross-burning, federalism and state sovereignty, failed
Supreme Court nominations, and numerous First and Fourth Amendment
cases.
For more than fifty years, The Supreme Court Review has won acclaim
for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the
implications of the Court's most significant decisions. The Supreme
Court Review is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court
and its work, keeping up on the forefront of the origins, reforms,
and interpretations of American law. It is written by and for legal
academics, judges, political scientists, journalists, historians,
economists, policy planners, and sociologists.
For forty-eight years, "The Supreme Court Review "has been
lauded for providing authoritative discussion of the Court's most
significant decisions. The" Review" is an in-depth annual critique
of the Supreme Court and its work, at the forefront of studies of
the origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law. Recent
volumes have considered such issues as the 2000 presidential
election, cross burning, federalism and state sovereignty, the
"United States v. American Library Association "case, failed
Supreme Court nominations, and numerous First and Fourth amendment
cases.
For more than fifty years, The Supreme Court Review has been lauded
for providing authoritative discussion of the Courts' most
significant decisions. With an in-depth annual critique of the
Supreme Court and its work, The Supreme Court Review keeps at the
forefront of the reforms and interpretations of American law. The
recent volumes have considered such issues as post-9/11 security,
the 2000 presidential election, cross burning, federalism and state
sovereignty, failed Supreme Court nominations, the battles
concerning same-sex marriage, and numerous First and Fourth
Amendment cases.
This book contains Supreme Court cases from the year 1982.
Since it first appeared in 1960, the "Supreme Court Review" has won
acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the
implications of the Court's most significant decisions. Individual
essays in the 1994 volume include articles by Craig M. Bradley on
RICO and the first amendment; Bernard Schwartz on clear and present
danger versus advocacy of unlawful action; William P. Marshall and
Susan Gilles on the Supreme Court, the first amendment, and bad
journalism; Paul Finkelman on "Prigg v. Pennsylvania"; Richard H.
Fallon, Jr. on sexual harassment, content neutrality, and the first
amendment; Lea Brilmayer on federalism, state authority, and the
preemptive power of internal law; and C. Edwin Baker on Turner
Broadcasting and content-based regulation of persons and presses.
"Some of the best researched and most thoughtful criticism of
recent decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court."--"Ethics"
"The Supreme Court Review" keeps you at the forefront of the
Court's most significant decisions by surveying its origins,
reforms, and interpretations of American law and compelling you to
consider the impacts of legal institutions and judicial opinion.
Diverse essays of informed analyses of past and present opinions
document the complexities of the Court and relevant public law
issues. Legal scholars, lawyers, judges, historians, political
scientists, economists, and journalists have won acclaim for their
contributions to each volume.
Since it first appeared in 1960, The Supreme Court Review has won
acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the
implications of the Court's most significant decisions. Consisting
of diverse essays by distinguished lawyers, historians, and social
scientists, each volume presents informed analyses of past and
present opinions and discusses important public law issues that
have come under Court consideration.
Which Question? Which Lie? Reflections on the Physician-Assisted
Suicide Cases Martha MinowThe Value of Seeing Things Differently:
Boerne v Flores and Congressional Enforcement of the Bill of Rights
David ColeCongressional Power and Religious Liberty after City of
Boerne v Flores Christopher L. Eisgruber, Lawrence G. Sager.Freedom
of Speech, Shielding Children, and Transcending Balancing Eugene
VolokhPrintz, State Sovereignty, and the Limits of Formalism Evan
H. CaminkerO'Hagan's Problems Victor BrudneyTraffic Stops, Minority
Motorists, and the Future of the Fourth Amendment David A.
SklanskyEntrenching the Duopoly: Why the Supreme Court Should not
Allow the States to Protect the Democrats and Republicans from
Political Competition Richard L. Hasen"The Ideal New Frontier
Judge" Dennis J. HutchinsonThe Court and the Corporation:
Jurisprudence, Localism, and Federalism Gregory A. MarkDo not Go
Gently into that Good Right: the First Amendment in the High Court
of Australia Gerald N. Rosenberg, John M. Williams.
Since it first appeared in 1960, the "Supreme Court Review" has won
acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the
implications of the Court's most significant decisions. Individual
essays in the 1994 volume include articles by Craig M. Bradley on
RICO and the first amendment; Bernard Schwartz on clear and present
danger versus advocacy of unlawful action; William P. Marshall and
Susan Gilles on the Supreme Court, the first amendment, and bad
journalism; Paul Finkelman on "Prigg v. Pennsylvania"; Richard H.
Fallon, Jr. on sexual harassment, content neutrality, and the first
amendment; Lea Brilmayer on federalism, state authority, and the
preemptive power of internal law; and C. Edwin Baker on Turner
Broadcasting and content-based regulation of persons and presses.
For forty-five years "The Supreme Court Review "has been lauded for
providing authoritative discussion of the Court's most significant
decisions. Recent volumes have considered issues such as the 2000
presidential election, cross-burning, federalism and state
sovereignty, the "United States v. American Library Association"
case, and numerous First and Fourth amendment cases. Distinguished
participants analyze current and previous concerns and attitudes
and discuss the implications of court decisions.
Since its inception in 1960, "The Supreme Court Review" has been
lauded for providing authoritative discussion of the Court's most
significant decisions. Recent volumes have considered issues such
as the 2000 elections in Florida, Federalism and state sovereignty,
the Boerne v. Flores case, and numerous Fourth Amendment issues.
Distinguished participants analyze current and previous public
issues, sentiments, and the implications of Court decisions.
Since it first appeared in 1960, "The Supreme Court Review" has won
acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the
implications of the Court's most significant decisions. Consisting
of diverse essays by distinguished lawyers, historians, and social
scientists, each volume presents informed analyses of past and
present opinions and discusses important public law issues that
have come under Court consideration.
|
You may like...
The Flame
Leonard Cohen
Hardcover
(3)
R716
R536
Discovery Miles 5 360
|