This is a very welcome volume, and it will reach a large audience and readership among those involved in these issues from a truly multidisciplinary perspective; in essence, a much needed book Erik Bonsdorff, professor of marine biology at bo Akademi University, Finland This timely volume provides a thorough account of how the highly advanced industrial societies seek to govern and manage the Baltic Sea. The way they proceed, and the degree to which they succeed, provide valuable lessons for riparian states seeking to avoid tragedies of their commons. Lennart J. Lundqvist, professor of environmental policy and administration, University of Gothenburg, Sweden How is a natural common pool resource such as a sea, which is shared by several countries, best governed? The potential for international conflict is immense, as each country may have different agendas with regard to issues such as exploitation and environmental protection. This book uses a case study of the Baltic Sea Region to examine this complex problem. The sea itself has been highly vulnerable to pollution and recently the bordering nations have begun to change their mode of cooperation to tackle this issue by establishing several new forums to manage the sea. Administrative and political structures developed in the region are reviewed and shown to provide a model that could be applied to other seas and natural resource systems elsewhere in the world."

This is a very welcome volume, and it will reach a large audience and readership among those involved in these issues from a truly multidisciplinary perspective; in essence, a much needed book! Erik Bonsdorff, professor of marine biology at bo Akademi University, Finland This timely volume provides a thorough account of how the highly advanced industrial societies seek to govern and manage the Baltic Sea. The way they proceed, and the degree to which they succeed, provide valuable lessons for riparian states seeking to avoid tragedies of their commons. Lennart J. Lundqvist, professor of environmental policy and administration, University of Gothenburg, Sweden How is a natural common pool resource such as a sea, which is shared by several countries, best governed? The potential for international conflict is immense, as each country may have different agendas with regard to issues such as exploitation and environmental protection. This book uses a case study of the Baltic Sea Region to examine this complex problem. The sea itself has been highly vulnerable to pollution and recently the bordering nations have begun to change their mode of cooperation to tackle this issue by establishing several new forums to manage the sea. Administrative and political structures developed in the region are reviewed and shown to provide a model that could be applied to other seas and natural resource systems elsewhere in the world.

As the world faces the prospect of climate change, nuclear disasters, and water scarcity, it is clear that environmental degradation is an increasingly serious challenge with economic and social consequences. In this book, Detlef Jahn analyzes political processes in a macro-comparative study in order to estimate the role of politics in the field of environmental performance in twenty-one OECD countries. His model demonstrates various styles of politics used to combat environmental degradation. He finds that economic and environmental performance are still closely linked, and that moving towards a service society does not by itself solve the environmental challenge. The close relationship of these areas was made strikingly clear in the economic crisis of the new millennium. He argues that economic globalization fosters environmental deterioration, and undermines efforts in domestic politics and international coordination to improve the environmental record.

As the world faces the prospect of climate change, nuclear disasters, and water scarcity, it is clear that environmental degradation is an increasingly serious challenge with economic and social consequences. In this book, Detlef Jahn analyzes political processes in a macro-comparative study in order to estimate the role of politics in the field of environmental performance in twenty-one OECD countries. His model demonstrates various styles of politics used to combat environmental degradation. He finds that economic and environmental performance are still closely linked, and that moving towards a service society does not by itself solve the environmental challenge. The close relationship of these areas was made strikingly clear in the economic crisis of the new millennium. He argues that economic globalization fosters environmental deterioration, and undermines efforts in domestic politics and international coordination to improve the environmental record.

Die vergleichende Politikwissenschaft ist eine Teildisziplin der Politikwissenschaft, deren Selbstverstandnis sich durch die vergleichende Methode ergibt. Oftmals ist die vergleichende Methode in der Politikwissenschaft der einzig gangbare Weg, um generalisierbare Aussagen uber gesellschaftspolitische Prozesse zu treffen. Allerdings ist ein systematischer Vergleich voraussetzungsvoll und es mussen verschiedene Faktoren beachtet werden, um die vergleichende Methode in der Politikwissenschaft Gewinn bringend anwenden zu konnen. Dieses Lehrbuch stellt die umfassendste deutschsprachige Monographie zur vergleichenden Politikwissenschaft dar. Dabei gibt der Autor einen vertiefenden Uberblick uber Gegenstandsbereiche, Logik, Theorien und Methoden der vergleichenden Politikwissenschaft. Die anwendungsorientierte Einfuhrung eroffnet die Moglichkeit, die vergleichende Politikwissenschaft in ihren Grundzugen zu verstehen und gibt Anleitung, spezifisches Wissen zu vertiefen. Das Buch wendet sich sowohl an Studienanfanger als auch an Fortgeschrittene."

Der Vergleich als Methode gehort zu den altesten Formen des Erkenntnisgewinns. Durch die systematische Gegenuberstellung von Tatbestanden konnen Unterschiede und Gemeinsamkeiten erkannt, Hypothesen gepruft, Theorien entwickelt und das Wissen uber die singulare Situation hinaus erweitert werden. Methoden des Vergleichens haben in der Politikwissenschaft eine lange Tradition, die sich in einer eigenen Disziplin, der vergleichenden Politikwissenschaft, aussert. Fur wissenschaftliche Zwecke ist es notwendig, den Vergleich in eine Systematik zu uberfuhren, was zu der Etablierung vergleichender Methoden der Politikwissenschaft gefuhrt hat. Diese haben in den letzten Jahren viele Weiterentwicklungen erfahren, die bislang oft nur begrenzt vom angelsachsischen in den deutschen Sprachraum vorgedrungen sind. Der vorliegende Band macht es sich zur Aufgabe, diese neueren Entwicklungen und zentralen Diskussionen in einzelnen, fundierten Beitragen von Spezialisten interessierten Kollegen in Deutschland vorzulegen und die neuere Diskussion vergleichender Methoden der Politik- und Sozialwissenschaften voranzubringen