|
|
Showing 1 - 4 of
4 matches in All Departments
Parliaments are often seen as Western European and North American
institutions and their establishment in other parts of the world as
a derivative and mostly defective process. This book challenges
such Eurocentric visions by retracing the evolution of modern
institutions of collective decision-making in Eurasia. Breaching
the divide between different area studies, the book provides nine
case studies covering the area between the eastern edge of Asia and
Eastern Europe, including the former Russian, Ottoman, Qing, and
Japanese Empires as well as their successor states. In particular,
it explores the appeals to concepts of parliamentarism,
deliberative decision-making, and constitutionalism; historical
practices related to parliamentarism; and political mythologies
across Eurasia. It focuses on the historical and "reestablished"
institutions of decision-making, which consciously hark back to
indigenous traditions and adapt them to the changing circumstances
in imperial and postimperial contexts. Thereby, the book explains
how representative institutions were needed for the establishment
of modernized empires or postimperial states but at the same time
offered a connection to the past. The Open Access version of this
book, available at
http://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/e/9780367691271, has been made
available under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No
Derivatives 4.0 licence.
This book examines the political parties which emerged on the
territories of the former Ottoman, Qing, Russian, and Habsburg
empires and not only took over government power but merged with
government itself. It discusses how these parties, disillusioned
with previous constitutional and parliamentary reforms, justified
their takeovers with programs of controlled or supervised economic
and social development, including acting as the mediators between
the various social and ethnic groups in the respective territories.
It pays special attention to nation-building through the party, to
institutions (both constitutional and de facto), and to the global
and comparative aspects of one-party regimes. It explores the
origins of one-party regimes in China, Czechoslovakia, Korea, the
Soviet Union, Turkey, Yugoslavia, and beyond, the roles of
socialism and nationalism in the parties' approaches to development
and state-building, as well the pedagogical aspirations of the
ruling elites. Hence, by revisiting the dynamics of the transition
from the earlier imperial formations via constitutionalism to
one-party governments, and by assessing the internal and external
dynamics of one-party regimes after their establishment, the book
more precisely locates this type of regime within the contemporary
world's political landscape. Moreover, it emphasises that one-party
regimes thrived on both sides of the Cold War and in some of the
non-aligned states, and that although some state socialist
one-party regimes collapsed in 1989-1991, in other places
historically dominant parties and new parties have continued to
monopolize political power. The Open Access version of this book,
available at http://www.taylorfrancis.com, has been made available
under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives
4.0 license.
Parliaments are often seen as Western European and North American
institutions and their establishment in other parts of the world as
a derivative and mostly defective process. This book challenges
such Eurocentric visions by retracing the evolution of modern
institutions of collective decision-making in Eurasia. Breaching
the divide between different area studies, the book provides nine
case studies covering the area between the eastern edge of Asia and
Eastern Europe, including the former Russian, Ottoman, Qing, and
Japanese Empires as well as their successor states. In particular,
it explores the appeals to concepts of parliamentarism,
deliberative decision-making, and constitutionalism; historical
practices related to parliamentarism; and political mythologies
across Eurasia. It focuses on the historical and "reestablished"
institutions of decision-making, which consciously hark back to
indigenous traditions and adapt them to the changing circumstances
in imperial and postimperial contexts. Thereby, the book explains
how representative institutions were needed for the establishment
of modernized empires or postimperial states but at the same time
offered a connection to the past. The Open Access version of this
book, available at
http://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/e/9780367691271, has been made
available under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No
Derivatives 4.0 licence.
|
|