|
|
Showing 1 - 3 of
3 matches in All Departments
Interwar European minority questions have been predominantly
discussed in the context of Eastern Europe until now. This open
access book challenges that geographical emphasis by examining both
Eastern and Western European experiences. It thus lays the
foundation for a new comparative international history of the
relations between national majorities and minorities in Europe
after the Great War. Building on the assumption that nationalist
conflicts are based on dynamic interactions between multiple
actors, this book brings together different perspectives and
methodological approaches (political, social and transnational) to
provide a comprehensive account of minority questions between the
two World Wars. With contributions from leading academics and
emerging scholars based in Austria, Ireland, Poland, Spain,
Switzerland, the UK and the USA among others, Sovereignty,
Nationalism, and the Quest for Homogeneity in Interwar Europe is a
wide-ranging study which is firmly anchored in the history of the
transition from empires to nation-states as well as in the history
of human rights and the nation-state. The ebook editions of this
book are available open access under a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 licence on
bloomsburycollections.com. Open access was funded by the Swiss
National Science Foundation (SNSF).
Based on rigorous analysis of the propaganda of five Western
European separatist parties, this book provides in-depth
examination of the 'nationalism of the rich', defined as a type of
nationalist discourse that seeks to end the economic 'exploitation'
suffered by a group of people represented as a wealthy nation and
supposedly carried out by the populations of poorer regions and/or
by inefficient state administrations. It shows that the nationalism
of the rich represents a new phenomenon peculiar to societies that
have set in place complex systems of wealth redistribution and
adopted economic growth as the main principle of government
legitimacy. The book argues that the nationalism of the rich can be
seen as a rhetorical strategy portraying independent statehood as a
solution to the dilemma between solidarity and efficiency arisen in
Western Europe since the end of the Glorious Thirties. It further
suggests that its formation can be best explained by the following
combination of factors: (1) the creation, from the end of the
Second World War, of extensive forms of automatic redistribution to
a scale previously unprecedented; (2) the beginning, from the
mid-1970s, of an era of 'permanent austerity' exacerbated, in
specific contexts, by situations of serious public policy failure;
(3) the existence of national/cultural cleavages roughly squaring
with uneven development and sharp income differentials among
territorial areas of a given state.
Based on rigorous analysis of the propaganda of five Western
European separatist parties, this book provides in-depth
examination of the 'nationalism of the rich', defined as a type of
nationalist discourse that seeks to end the economic 'exploitation'
suffered by a group of people represented as a wealthy nation and
supposedly carried out by the populations of poorer regions and/or
by inefficient state administrations. It shows that the nationalism
of the rich represents a new phenomenon peculiar to societies that
have set in place complex systems of wealth redistribution and
adopted economic growth as the main principle of government
legitimacy. The book argues that the nationalism of the rich can be
seen as a rhetorical strategy portraying independent statehood as a
solution to the dilemma between solidarity and efficiency arisen in
Western Europe since the end of the Glorious Thirties. It further
suggests that its formation can be best explained by the following
combination of factors: (1) the creation, from the end of the
Second World War, of extensive forms of automatic redistribution to
a scale previously unprecedented; (2) the beginning, from the
mid-1970s, of an era of 'permanent austerity' exacerbated, in
specific contexts, by situations of serious public policy failure;
(3) the existence of national/cultural cleavages roughly squaring
with uneven development and sharp income differentials among
territorial areas of a given state.
|
|