|
Showing 1 - 6 of
6 matches in All Departments
The LNCS journal Transactions on Aspect-Oriented Software
Development is devoted to all facets of aspect-oriented software
development (AOSD) techniques in the context of all phases of the
software life cycle, from requirements and design to
implementation, maintenance and evolution. The focus of the journal
is on approaches for systematic identification, modularization,
representation, and composition of crosscutting concerns, i.e., the
aspects and evaluation of such approaches and their impact on
improving quality attributes of software systems. This volume, the
12th in the Transactions on Aspect-Oriented Software Development
series, contains one regular paper, on modular reasoning in
aspect-oriented languages from a substitution perspective, and four
extended, improved papers selected from those presented at
Modularity 2014. Topics covered include novel dynamic semantics
through delegation proxies, modularity potential detection based on
co-change clusters, improvements in reusability for components of
semantic specifications of programming languages, and probabilistic
model checking applied to dynamically generated members of a
product line.
The21stEuropeanConferenceonObject-OrientedProgramming,ECOOP2007,
was held in Berlin, Germany, on July 30 to August 3, 2007. ECOOP is
the most importantand inspiring forumin Europeandbeyond for
researchers,practiti- ers, and students working in that smorgasbord
of topics and approaches known as object orientation. This topic
area was explored and challenged by excellent invited speakers-two
of which were the winners of this year's Dahl-Nygaard award-in the
carefully refereed and selected technical papers, on posters, via
demonstrations, and in tutorials. Each of the many workshops
complemented this with a very interactive and dynamic treatment of
more speci?c topics. - nally, panels allowed for loud and lively
disagreement. Yet, it is one of ECOOP's specialqualities that this
plethora ofactivities add upto a coherentandexciting whole, rather
than deteriorating into chaos. The Program Committee received 161
submissions this year. Only 135 of them were carried through the
full review process, because of a number of - tractions and a
number of submissions of abstracts that were never followed by a
full paper. However, the remaining papers were of very high quality
and we accepted25 of them for publication. Helping very goodpapers
to be published is more useful than having an impressively low
acceptance rate. The papers were selected according to four groups
of criteria, whose priority depended on the paper: relevance;
originality and signi?cance; precisionand correctness;and p-
sentation and clarity. Each paper had three, four, or ?ve reviews,
depending on how controversial it was.
|
|