|
|
Showing 1 - 4 of
4 matches in All Departments
How should religion and ethics be studied if we want to understand
what people believe and why they act the way they do? In the 1980s
and '90s postmodernist worries about led to debates that turned on
power, truth, and relativism. Since the turn of the century
scholars impressed by 'cognitive science' have introduced concepts
drawn from evolutionary biology, neurosciences, and linguistics in
the attempt to provide 'naturalist' accounts of religion. Deploying
concepts and arguments that have their roots in the pragmatism of
C. S. Peirce, Believing and Acting argues that both approaches are
misguided and largely unhelpful in answering the questions that
matter: What did those people believe then? How does it relate to
what these people want to do now? What is our evidence for our
interpretations? Pragmatic inquiry into these questions recommends
an approach that questions grand theories, advocates a critical
pluralism about religion and ethics that defies disciplinary
boundaries in the pursuit of the truth. Rationality, on a pragmatic
approach, is about solving particular problems in medias res, thus
there is no hard and fast line to be drawn between inquiry and
advocacy; both are essential to negotiating day to day life. The
upshot is an approach to religion and ethics in which inquiry looks
much like the art history of Michael Baxandall and advocacy like
the art criticism of Arthur Danto.
Bosnia and Hercegovina emerged in the wake of the Second World War
as a melting pot for the cultures that had determined the history
of the South Slavs since the middle ages. Catholic, Orthodox, and
Muslim all shared in and contributed to the political and cultural
life of Yugoslavia's most diverse republic.
In 1992, this life was shattered as separatist militias brought war
to Bosnia and Hercegovina.What is the religious heritage that
drives the warring factions and how does it relate to the
nationalist aspirations of many of the participants? From diverse
academic and philosophical perspectives, the works of Jean Bethke
Elshtain, James Turner Johnson, Michael Sells, John Kelsay, and G.
Scott Davis will inform not just scholars of ethics, politics and
religion, but everyone concerned with the prospects for justice in
the post-Cold War world.
Recent work by Stanley Hauerwas, Alasdair MacIntyre, and Robert
Bellah has brought considerable attention to bear on the ethics of
virtue. Little clarity has, however, emerged from that discussion
on what difference such an ethic would make in practical and
political deliberations. Warcraft and the Fragility of Virtue
presents, for the first time, a well-developed and effective
Aristotelian perspective on reasoning about war and warfare.Author
G. Scott Davis first sketches the fundamentals of as Aristotelian
approach to the ethics of war, arguing that the virtue is a craft,
of itself fragile, that must be sustained by a community that makes
the highest demands upon itself. Introduced as a criterion for
evaluating alliances and international relations, the concept of
moral community is also of the highest significance for
interpreting those ruptures within the community, including
resistance and rebellion, that arise concomitantly with the
prospect and onset of war.
Bosnia and Hercegovina emerged in the wake of the Second World War
as a melting pot for the cultures that had determined the history
of the South Slavs since the middle ages. Catholic, Orthodox, and
Muslim all shared in and contributed to the political and cultural
life of Yugoslavia's most diverse republic.
In 1992, this life was shattered as separatist militias brought war
to Bosnia and Hercegovina.What is the religious heritage that
drives the warring factions and how does it relate to the
nationalist aspirations of many of the participants? From diverse
academic and philosophical perspectives, the works of Jean Bethke
Elshtain, James Turner Johnson, Michael Sells, John Kelsay, and G.
Scott Davis will inform not just scholars of ethics, politics and
religion, but everyone concerned with the prospects for justice in
the post-Cold War world.
|
|