Welcome to Loot.co.za!
Sign in / Register |Wishlists & Gift Vouchers |Help | Advanced search
|
Your cart is empty |
|||
Showing 1 - 6 of 6 matches in All Departments
Thirty-three of the top scholars in this fast moving domain present
a picture of work at the cusp in social psychology -- work that
deals with cognition and affect in close relationships. The present
volume contains a wealth of research findings and influential
theoretical accounts that spring as much from indigenous work in
the close relationship field as from purebred social cognition. The
chapters introduce theories and research programs concerned with
the role of individual and couple differences in close relationship
knowledge structures. They deal with the role of emotion and affect
in close relationships. And they discuss the function of cognition
and knowledge structures in relation to the developmental course of
close relationships. Each section is accompanied by a critical
review written by an expert in the field.
The past decade has witnessed an explosion of interest and research on close relationships and social cognition. In both areas, numerous handbooks, textbooks, and journal articles have been published. However, it is the editors' impression that although cognitive theories and concepts have filtered through to research dealing with close relationships, much of this research reflects a relatively untutored understanding of the theoretical and empirical work in social cognition. Conversely, the research literature that provides a more sophisticated perspective on the role of cognition in close relationships typically reveals a relatively limited knowledge of the literature on close relationships. As researchers who have worked in both social cognitive processes and close relationships, Fletcher and Fincham are convinced that each field has much to offer the other. In fact, their book is based on two important postulates: first, that a social cognitive framework offers a valuable resource for developing our understanding of close relationships; and, second, that studying cognition within close relationships has the potential to inform our understanding of basic social cognitive processes.
Thirty-three of the top scholars in this fast moving domain present
a picture of work at the cusp in social psychology -- work that
deals with cognition and affect in close relationships. The present
volume contains a wealth of research findings and influential
theoretical accounts that spring as much from indigenous work in
the close relationship field as from purebred social cognition. The
chapters introduce theories and research programs concerned with
the role of individual and couple differences in close relationship
knowledge structures. They deal with the role of emotion and affect
in close relationships. And they discuss the function of cognition
and knowledge structures in relation to the developmental course of
close relationships. Each section is accompanied by a critical
review written by an expert in the field.
The examination and evaluation of folk psychology and lay cognition
has been carried out predominantly in two domains: personality and
social psychology, and the philosophy of psychology. Yet, work in
these two areas has largely proceeded independently. The assumption
on which this volume is founded is that a proper comparison between
scientific cognition and folk ways of thought rests on an adequate
study of both science and folk psychology. With this in mind, the
author provides an analysis of the intricate, and often hidden,
links between these two spheres. In doing so, the book poses two
related questions. First, what is the nature of folk psychology and
how is it related to scientific psychology? Second, of what should
the relationship between folk psychology and scientific psychology
consist? In answering these two questions, the author draws
extensively from research and arguments in social psychology and
social cognition, cognitive science, and the philosophy of science.
The examination and evaluation of folk psychology and lay cognition
has been carried out predominantly in two domains: personality and
social psychology, and the philosophy of psychology. Yet, work in
these two areas has largely proceeded independently. The assumption
on which this volume is founded is that a proper comparison between
scientific cognition and folk ways of thought rests on an adequate
study of both science and folk psychology. With this in mind, the
author provides an analysis of the intricate, and often hidden,
links between these two spheres. In doing so, the book poses two
related questions. First, what is the nature of folk psychology and
how is it related to scientific psychology? Second, of what should
the relationship between folk psychology and scientific psychology
consist? In answering these two questions, the author draws
extensively from research and arguments in social psychology and
social cognition, cognitive science, and the philosophy of science.
The past decade has witnessed an explosion of interest and research on close relationships and social cognition. In both areas, numerous handbooks, textbooks, and journal articles have been published. However, it is the editors' impression that although cognitive theories and concepts have filtered through to research dealing with close relationships, much of this research reflects a relatively untutored understanding of the theoretical and empirical work in social cognition. Conversely, the research literature that provides a more sophisticated perspective on the role of cognition in close relationships typically reveals a relatively limited knowledge of the literature on close relationships. As researchers who have worked in both social cognitive processes and close relationships, Fletcher and Fincham are convinced that each field has much to offer the other. In fact, their book is based on two important postulates: first, that a social cognitive framework offers a valuable resource for developing our understanding of close relationships; and, second, that studying cognition within close relationships has the potential to inform our understanding of basic social cognitive processes.
|
You may like...
|