|
Showing 1 - 5 of
5 matches in All Departments
Both Europe and the Asia Pacific agree their relationship is
important. For many years it has been considered the weakest leg of
the trilateral international system with US/Asia Pacific relations
at the forefront. In the last few years, however, real efforts have
been made to broaden and enhance the ties that bind Europe and
Asia. This book is organized into five sections that examine the
basic aspects of Europe/Asia Pacific relations. The first covers
the historical background, the second is concerned with the
contemporary political setting and the third with the vitally
important economic situation. The last two parts deal with security
considerations and policy initiatives. All have been compiled by
experts from both regions. The book is the product of the Council
for Asia-Europe cooperation (CAEC), a body of think tanks that
supports the Asia-Europe Summit Meeting (ASEM) process.
Both Europe and the Asia Pacific agree their relationship is
important. For many years it has been considered the weakest leg of
the trilateral international system with US/Asia Pacific relations
at the forefront. In the last few years, however, real efforts have
been made to broaden and enhance the ties that bind Europe and
Asia. This book is organized into five sections that examine the
basic aspects of Europe/Asia Pacific relations. The first covers
the historical background, the second is concerned with the
contemporary political setting and the third with the vitally
important economic situation. The last two parts deal with security
considerations and policy initiatives. All have been compiled by
experts from both regions. The book is the product of the Council
for Asia-Europe cooperation (CAEC), a body of think tanks that
supports the Asia-Europe Summit Meeting (ASEM) process.
Can Germany and Japan do more militarily to uphold the
international order? Since the end of World War II, Germany and
Japan have been the most reluctant of all major U.S. allies to take
on military responsibilities. Given their histories, this
reluctance certainly is understandable. But because of their size
and economic importance, Germany and Japan are the most important
U.S. allies in Europe and in East Asia, respectively, and their
long-term reluctance to share the defense burden has become a
perennial source of frustration for Washington. The potential
security roles of Germany and Japan are becoming increasingly
important given the uncertainty, indeed volatility, of today's
international environment. Under President Trump, friction among
allies over burden-sharing is more intense than ever before.
Meanwhile, the security environments in Europe and Asia have
deteriorated because of the resurgence of a belligerent Russia
under Vladimir Putin, the steady rise of an increasingly assertive
China, and North Korea's worrisome acquisition of nuclear weapons.
Partly in response to these developments, Germany and Japan in
recent years have boosted their security efforts, mainly by
increasing defense spending and taking on a somewhat broader range
of military missions. Even so, because of their cultures of
anti-militarism resistance remains strong in both countries to
rebuilding the military and assuming more responsibility for
sustaining regional or even global peace. In Reluctant Warriors, a
team of noted international experts critically examines how and why
Germany and Japan have modified their military postures since 1990
so far, and assesses how far the countries still have to go and
why. The contributors also highlight the risks the United States
takes if it makes too simplistic a demand for the two countries to
"do more.
|
|