|
Showing 1 - 18 of
18 matches in All Departments
The first treatise on English law. Reprint of the second edition,
which was a reissue of the first edition (1569). 4], v-xii (new
introduction), xxx], 444 i.e. 442] fol. 916 pp.] The pagination of
the 1569 and 1640 issues is identical. A systematic work, it
emphasizes the separation of procedural and substantive matters and
also cites cases as sources of at least intellectual, if not
formal, authority. In Maitland's words, Bracton's Legibus is "the
crown and flower of English medieval jurisprudence" and "by far the
greatest of our medieval law books." Sweet & Maxwell adds that
it "is distinguished by rich casuistic details, and by the careful
reproduction of the judicial decisions on individual cases of law."
Sweet & Maxwell, A Legal Bibliography of the British
Commonwealth 1:51 (6).
The thirteenth-century Latin legal treatise best known as Bracton
is now thought to be the work of several hands, and Henry de
Bracton (d.1268) to have been only the last of these. Work began on
it in the 1230s and largely ceased in the early 1250s, but the
treatise - an ambitious survey of English law - was never finished.
Between 1878 and 1883, the scholar and jurist Sir Travers Twiss
(1809-97) edited and published this work in six volumes for the
Rolls Series. His text was mainly based on the first printed
edition of 1569. Although he provided the first English translation
of Bracton, Twiss's work has been criticised and since superseded.
Volume 1 contains Book 1 and most of Book 2. These include the
general introduction, the law of persons and most of the law of
things.
The thirteenth-century Latin legal treatise best known as Bracton
is now thought to be the work of several hands, and Henry de
Bracton (d.1268) to have been only the last of these. Work began on
it in the 1230s and largely ceased in the early 1250s, but the
treatise - an ambitious survey of English law - was never finished.
Between 1878 and 1883, the scholar and jurist Sir Travers Twiss
(1809-97) edited and published this work in six volumes for the
Rolls Series. His text was mainly based on the first printed
edition of 1569. Although he provided the first English translation
of Bracton, Twiss's work has been criticised and since superseded.
Volume 2 contains the end of Book 2 and the whole of Book 3. These
cover the classification of actions, the general eyre, criminal law
and the action of replevin.
The thirteenth-century Latin legal treatise best known as Bracton
is now thought to be the work of several hands, and Henry de
Bracton (d.1268) to have been only the last of these. Work began on
it in the 1230s and largely ceased in the early 1250s, but the
treatise - an ambitious survey of English law - was never finished.
Between 1878 and 1883, the scholar and jurist Sir Travers Twiss
(1809-97) edited and published this work in six volumes for the
Rolls Series. His text was mainly based on the first printed
edition of 1569. Although he provided the first English translation
of Bracton, Twiss's work has been criticised and since superseded.
Volume 3 contains the first part of Book 4. This covers the assize
of novel disseisin, and related actions and litigation about rights
of common.
The thirteenth-century Latin legal treatise best known as Bracton
is now thought to be the work of several hands, and Henry de
Bracton (d.1268) to have been only the last of these. Work began on
it in the 1230s and largely ceased in the early 1250s, but the
treatise - an ambitious survey of English law - was never finished.
Between 1878 and 1883, the scholar and jurist Sir Travers Twiss
(1809-97) edited and published this work in six volumes for the
Rolls Series. His text was mainly based on the first printed
edition of 1569. Although he provided the first English translation
of Bracton, Twiss's work has been criticised and since superseded.
Volume 4 contains the second part of Book 4. It covers the assizes
of darrein presentment, mort d'ancestor and utrum, and related
actions and litigation about dower.
The thirteenth-century Latin legal treatise best known as Bracton
is now thought to be the work of several hands, and Henry de
Bracton (d.1268) to have been only the last of these. Work began on
it in the 1230s and largely ceased in the early 1250s, but the
treatise - an ambitious survey of English law - was never finished.
Between 1878 and 1883, the scholar and jurist Sir Travers Twiss
(1809-97) edited and published this work in six volumes for the
Rolls Series. His text was mainly based on the first printed
edition of 1569. Although he provided the first English translation
of Bracton, Twiss's work has been criticised and since superseded.
Volume 5 contains the final part of Book 4 and the first part of
Book 5. These discuss writs of entry and writs of right, and
procedural issues relating to essoins, defaults and the view.
The thirteenth-century Latin legal treatise best known as Bracton
is now thought to be the work of several hands, and Henry de
Bracton (d.1268) to have been only the last of these. Work began on
it in the 1230s and largely ceased in the early 1250s, but the
treatise - an ambitious survey of English law - was never finished.
Between 1878 and 1883, the scholar and jurist Sir Travers Twiss
(1809-97) edited and published this work in six volumes for the
Rolls Series. His text was mainly based on the first printed
edition of 1569. Although he provided the first English translation
of Bracton, Twiss's work has been criticised and since superseded.
Volume 6 contains the remainder of Book 5. It covers warranty,
exceptions and writs of prohibition to court christian.
Henry of Bracton (or Bratton) (c. 1210 1268) was a jurist who
worked as a Justice of Assize in the south-west of England, and was
the author of the first systematic discussion of English common
law. The manuscripts which form Bracton's Note Book were discovered
in the British Museum in 1884 by Vinogradoff, and were edited in
three volumes in 1887 by Maitland. These volumes contain a
collection of over 2,000 lawsuits from the thirteenth century, each
with a description of how the law should be applied to the
particular circumstances of each case. This is the first example of
case law in English legal writing, and its usefulness as a record
of legal precedent probably led to the creation of Year Rolls
(official records of court cases) from 1268. Volume 1, 'Apparatus',
introduces the texts and gives an account of Bracton's life.
This publication, issued in cooperation with the Selden Society,
reproduces completely the Yale edition of 1915–1942, which has
long been unobtainable. To it has been added an English
translation, the first in almost a century, incorporating many
improvements of the text, drawn from a re-examination of the
manuscripts and a further identification of Henry de Bracton’s
sources, Roman and English. Volume I contains George E.
Woodbine’s prolegomena to his edition, written in 1915, to which
Samuel Thorne has added a prefatory note, reclassifying and
redating the manuscripts on which the edition was based. Volume II
begins the text and translation, which will be completed in Volume
III and Volume IV. Notes and indices will appear in Volume V.
Henry of Bracton (or Bratton) (c. 1210 1268) was a jurist who
worked as a Justice of Assize in the south-west of England, and was
the author of the first systematic discussion of English common
law. The manuscripts which form Bracton's Note Book were discovered
in the British Museum in 1884 by Vinogradoff, and were edited in
three volumes in 1887 by Maitland. These volumes contain a
collection of over 2,000 law cases from the thirteenth century,
each with a description of how the law should be applied to the
particular circumstances of each case. This is the first example of
case law in English legal writing, and its usefulness as a record
of legal precedent probably led to the creation of Year Rolls
(official records of court cases) from 1268. Volume 2 contains the
texts of Pleas in the Bench from 1218 to 1234.
Henry of Bracton (or Bratton) (c. 1210 1268) was a jurist who
worked as a Justice of Assize in the south-west of England, and was
the author of the first systematic discussion of English common
law. The manuscripts which form Bracton's Note Book were discovered
in the British Museum in 1884 by Vinogradoff, and were edited in
three volumes in 1887 by Maitland. These volumes contain a
collection of over 2,000 lawsuits from the thirteenth century, each
with a description of how the law should be applied to the
particular circumstances of each case. This is the first example of
case law in English legal writing, and its usefulness as a record
of legal precedent probably led to the creation of Year Rolls
(official records of court cases) from 1268. Volume 3 contains the
texts of Pleas in the Bench and before the King from 1224 to 1240.
This is an EXACT reproduction of a book published before 1923. This
IS NOT an OCR'd book with strange characters, introduced
typographical errors, and jumbled words. This book may have
occasional imperfections such as missing or blurred pages, poor
pictures, errant marks, etc. that were either part of the original
artifact, or were introduced by the scanning process. We believe
this work is culturally important, and despite the imperfections,
have elected to bring it back into print as part of our continuing
commitment to the preservation of printed works worldwide. We
appreciate your understanding of the imperfections in the
preservation process, and hope you enjoy this valuable book.
The thirteenth-century Latin legal treatise best known as Bracton
is now thought to be the work of several hands, and Henry de
Bracton (d.1268) to have been only the last of these. Work began on
it in the 1230s and largely ceased in the early 1250s, but the
treatise - an ambitious survey of English law - was never finished.
Between 1878 and 1883, the scholar and jurist Sir Travers Twiss
(1809-97) edited and published this work in six volumes for the
Rolls Series. His text was mainly based on the first printed
edition of 1569. Although he provided the first English translation
of Bracton, Twiss's work has been criticised and since superseded.
|
|