|
Showing 1 - 11 of
11 matches in All Departments
1. INTRODUCTION In the Spring of 1975 we held an international
workshop on the Foundations and Application of Decision Theory at
the University of Western Ontario. To help structure the workshop
into ordered and manageable sessions we distri buted the following
statement of our goals to all invited participants. They in turn
responded with useful revisions and suggested their own areas of
interest. Since this procedure provided the eventual format of the
sessions, we include it here as the most appropriate introduction
to these collected papers result ing from the workshop. The reader
can readily gauge the approximation to our mutual goals. 2.
STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES AND RATIONALE (Attached to this statement
is a bibliography; names of persons cited in the statement and
writing in this century will be found referenced in the biblio
graphy - certain 'classics' aSide. ) 2. 1. Preamble We understand
in the following the Theory of Decisions in a broader sense than is
presently customary, construing it to embrace a general theory of
decision-making, including social, political and economic theory
and applica tions. Thus, we subsume the Theory of Games under the
head of Decision Theory, regarding it as a particularly clearly
formulated version of part of the general theory of
decision-making."
1. INTRODUCTION In the Spring of 1975 we held an international
workshop on the Foundations and Application of Decision Theory at
the University of Western Ontario. To help structure the workshop
into ordered and manageable sessions we distri buted the following
statement of our goals to all invited participants. They in turn
responded with useful revisions and suggested their own areas of
interest. Since this procedure provided the eventual format of the
sessions, we include it here as the most appropriate introduction
to these collected papers result ing from the workshop. The reader
can readily gauge the approximation to our mutual goals. 2.
STATEMENT or OBJECTIVES AND RATIONALE (Attached to this statement
is a bibliography; names of persons cited in the statement and
writing in this century will be found referenced in the biblio
graphy - certain 'classics' aside. ) 2. 1. Preamble We understand
in the following the Theory of Decisions in a broader sense than is
presently customary, construing it to embrace a general theory of
deciSion-making, induding social, political and economic theory and
applica tions. Thus, we subsume the Theory of Games under the head
of Decision Theory, regarding it as a particularly clearly
formulated version of part of the general theory of
decision-making."
In spite of the seeming heterogeneity of topics in its title -
Revolutions, Systems, and Theories - this volume purports to be
something more than a random collection of Essays in Political
Philosophy. The Colloquium of the Philosophy Department of the
University of Western Ontario (29-31 Octo- ber, 1971) at which
initial versions of the first eight papers were delivered was
entitled 'Political Theory'; and while the organizers anticipated
and indeed welcomed topicality in the issues accorded priority arid
in the empirical evidence invoked, they were also hoping for a
reasonably comprehensive explorat ion of some of the central issues
of political philosophy. For this reason it was quickly decided
that in such a field a philosophical focus on clarification of
ordering concepts required the suppIement - and test - of
researches into more particular subject maUers by social
scientists. Thus, to speak in general terms (where the
specializatlons and their taxonomies multi- ply fissiparously!) ,
contributors include political scientists, economists and
sociologists (Barnard, Baston, Tullock, Rapoport) as well as
philosophers (Scriven, Morgenbesser, Braybrooke, TayIor), and
juxtaposed as proponents and commentators *to generate exchanges
across disciplinary frontiers. While the five additional invited
papers are alI by professional philosophers, they extend the
original Colloquium either by continuing controversy on its funda-
mental issues (e. g. , Rubinoff, Nielsen, Roy) or by their
continued explorations in what are acknowledged to be boundary
areas (e. g. , Schick, Wartofsky). The greatest topical emphasis is
that on revolution.
This volume grew out of the papers and comments presented at the
Fifth University of Western Ontario Philosophy Colloquium, October
31- November 2, 1969. The colloquium papers were delivered by P.
Suppes, R. B. Braithwaite, C. W. Churchman, and J. S. Minas.
Comments are provided from others attending the colloquium, with
one reply by P. Suppes. Also included are papers recently published
elsewhere by A. Michalos, P. Fishburn and H. -N. Castaneda. The
editors express thanks to these authors and to the editors of the
following respective journals for per mission to publish: Theory
and Decision, Synthese, and Critica. Finally, there is an extensive
bibliography of decision theory, vis-a. -vis science and values.
The editors wish to thank the officers of the University of Western
Ontario for making the colloquium possible. THE EDITORS CONTENTS
PREFACE V PATRICK SUPPES I The Concept of Obligation in the Context
of Decision Theory 1 HENR Y KYBURG I Comments 15 PATRICK SUPPES I
Reply to Professor Kyburg 19 R. B. BRAITHWAITE I Behind Decision
and Games Theory: Acting with a Co-Agent versus Acting Along with
Nature 22 ISAAC LEVI I Comments 56 RONALD GIERE I Comments 62 I. J.
GOOD I Comments 67 C. WEST CHURCHMAN I Measurement: A Systems
Approach 70 ISAAC LEVI I Comments 87 RONALD GIERE I Comments 95
PETER C. FISHBURN I Utility Theory with Inexact Preferences and
Degrees of Preference 98 I. J."
1. INTRODUCTION In the Spring of 1975 we held an international
workshop on the Foundations and Application of Decision Theory at
the University of Western Ontario. To help structure the workshop
into ordered and manageable sessions we distri buted the following
statement of our goals to all invited participants. They in turn
responded with useful revisions and suggested their own areas of
interest. Since this procedure provided the eventual format of the
sessions, we include it here as the most appropriate introduction
to these collected papers result ing from the workshop. The reader
can readily gauge the approximation to our mutual goals. 2.
STATEMENT or OBJECTIVES AND RATIONALE (Attached to this statement
is a bibliography; names of persons cited in the statement and
writing in this century will be found referenced in the biblio
graphy - certain 'classics' aside. ) 2. 1. Preamble We understand
in the following the Theory of Decisions in a broader sense than is
presently customary, construing it to embrace a general theory of
deciSion-making, induding social, political and economic theory and
applica tions. Thus, we subsume the Theory of Games under the head
of Decision Theory, regarding it as a particularly clearly
formulated version of part of the general theory of
decision-making."
In spite of the seeming heterogeneity of topics in its title -
Revolutions, Systems, and Theories - this volume purports to be
something more than a random collection of Essays in Political
Philosophy. The Colloquium of the Philosophy Department of the
University of Western Ontario (29-31 Octo- ber, 1971) at which
initial versions of the first eight papers were delivered was
entitled 'Political Theory'; and while the organizers anticipated
and indeed welcomed topicality in the issues accorded priority arid
in the empirical evidence invoked, they were also hoping for a
reasonably comprehensive explorat ion of some of the central issues
of political philosophy. For this reason it was quickly decided
that in such a field a philosophical focus on clarification of
ordering concepts required the suppIement - and test - of
researches into more particular subject maUers by social
scientists. Thus, to speak in general terms (where the
specializatlons and their taxonomies multi- ply fissiparously!) ,
contributors include political scientists, economists and
sociologists (Barnard, Baston, Tullock, Rapoport) as well as
philosophers (Scriven, Morgenbesser, Braybrooke, TayIor), and
juxtaposed as proponents and commentators *to generate exchanges
across disciplinary frontiers. While the five additional invited
papers are alI by professional philosophers, they extend the
original Colloquium either by continuing controversy on its funda-
mental issues (e. g. , Rubinoff, Nielsen, Roy) or by their
continued explorations in what are acknowledged to be boundary
areas (e. g. , Schick, Wartofsky). The greatest topical emphasis is
that on revolution.
1. INTRODUCTION In the Spring of 1975 we held an international
workshop on the Foundations and Application of Decision Theory at
the University of Western Ontario. To help structure the workshop
into ordered and manageable sessions we distri buted the following
statement of our goals to all invited participants. They in turn
responded with useful revisions and suggested their own areas of
interest. Since this procedure provided the eventual format of the
sessions, we include it here as the most appropriate introduction
to these collected papers result ing from the workshop. The reader
can readily gauge the approximation to our mutual goals. 2.
STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES AND RATIONALE (Attached to this statement
is a bibliography; names of persons cited in the statement and
writing in this century will be found referenced in the biblio
graphy - certain 'classics' aSide. ) 2. 1. Preamble We understand
in the following the Theory of Decisions in a broader sense than is
presently customary, construing it to embrace a general theory of
decision-making, including social, political and economic theory
and applica tions. Thus, we subsume the Theory of Games under the
head of Decision Theory, regarding it as a particularly clearly
formulated version of part of the general theory of
decision-making."
|
|