"To read the book is to appreciate the highly contingent, provisional, oblique, open-ended way in which people try to make "sense" of another culture."--Resil B. Mojares, "Philippine Graphic"
"This book is an interestingly complex ethnography that approaches the self-critical dialectical ethnography called for two decades ago....It is a welcome contribution to postmodernist theory and to the ethnography of the Visayas."--Ronald Provencher, "Journal of Asian Studies"

This ethnographic study of the Panare Indians of Venezuela is the first extensive look at a tribe of this region of the Amazonia. It is an important book not only because it delves into the myth-filled Panare culture, but also because the author has used a modified version of the structural analysis of Claude Levi-Strauss in examining the Panare. Levi-Strauss applied his method of structural analysis to the mythology of many societies in Amazonia, but never to any single society. Jean-Paul Dumont has filled that gap and has shown how the approach works in practice when applied to the intensive study of a single, small-scale culture. His book significantly expands the discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of the method. The work deals specifically with the implicit mythology of the Panare and is concerned with the symbolic activities manifested in the daily behavior of this group. The analysis of the symbolism, explains Dumont, allows for the discovery of the conceptual system through which the Panare conceive of themselves. The study is organized into two parts: a presentation of the data and an analysis. The presentation includes a geographical and historical account of the Panare and a general ethnological profile. The analysis is organized into the conceptual categories of inhabited space, time, astrosexuality, hearing, and taste. A concluding chapter summarizes the analysis. Under the Rainbow will be of interest and of value not only to anthropologists but also to linguists, philosophers, psychologists, and others interested in the general intellectual movement represented by French structuralism. The fieldwork for Under the Rainbow was conducted in Venezuelan Guiana from September 1967 to July 1969.

Cet ouvrage repond a un devoir d'humaniste: faciliter a un lecteur qu'interessent les problemes essentiels de la philosophie ancienne, donc classique, l'acces a la frequentation et a la comprehension du Corpus aristotelicien. Pour ce faire, on tente d'apporter une reponse a la question: pourquoi Aristote a-t-il rompu avec Platon, et pourquoi a-t-il ete conduit a jeter sur les choses un regard si different? L'intuition originaire d'Aristote tient dans la formule souvent repetee que le numeriquement un est discursivement deux . Toute pensee est analytique. Le discours qui s'exprime en termes de sujet et d'attribut reproduit l'analyse, par la pensee, de la substance en matiere et en forme, en puissance et en acte. Ainsi il peut parler scientifiquement des causes. La reflexion philosophique sur l'origine de l'aristotelisme rend manifeste la profonde unite du systeme et de son developpement.