|
|
Showing 1 - 2 of
2 matches in All Departments
What really caused the failure of the Soviet Union's ambitious
plans to modernize and industrialize its agricultural system? This
book is the first to investigate the gap between the plans and the
reality of the Soviet Union's mid-twentieth-century project to
industrialize and modernize its agricultural system. Historians
agree that the project failed badly: agriculture was inefficient,
unpredictable, and environmentally devastating for the entire
Soviet period. Yet assigning the blame exclusively to Soviet
planners would be off the mark. The real story is much more
complicated and interesting, Jenny Leigh Smith reveals in this
deeply researched book. Using case studies from five Soviet
regions, she acknowledges hubris and shortsightedness where it
occurred but also gives fair consideration to the difficulties
encountered and the successes-however modest-that were achieved.
In general, “development” denotes movement or growth toward
something better in the future. International
development—widespread in the decades following World War
II—was an effort at purposeful change in landscapes around the
world. Contributors to this volume argue that these projects
constituted an effort to transplant modernity, such as knowledge or
technology, from places seen as more developed to places perceived
as un- or underdeveloped. During its heyday, international
development included not just dams, roads, health programs, and
agricultural projects but also animal husbandry schemes, urban
development, and wildlife protection plans. Projects often
succeeded or failed because of existing environmental conditions,
and in turn, these programs remade—or tried to remake—the land,
water, wildlife, and people around them. From American-directed
failures in water engineering in Afghanistan to the impact of
livestock epidemics on economic growth in East Africa, the chapters
in Transplanting Modernity question how science, technology, and
faith in Western notions of progress have influenced the pace,
scope, and scale of development.
|
|