A Comprehensive History of the Tariff System in the United StatesGoss traces the tariff system through three avatars that often existed simultaneously: protective, preventive and punitive. From an ineffective colonial system that allowed importers to avoid payment through extended credit arrangements, to a somewhat less troubled system that demanded immediate cash payments in the early 1840s, to a punitive system designed to stymie smugglers during the Civil War, the collection of tariff duties was always problematic. This problem was enhanced in the wake of industrialization and protectionism when direct taxes began to supplant indirect taxation as the major source of government finance. Reviewing the history of American tariff regulation, Goss discerns a gradual process towards "more stringent supervision, regulation and control" (88). Originally published in the series Studies in History, Economics and Public Law edited by the Political Science Faculty of Columbia University.John Dean Goss (1869-?) served as a judge in Wisconsin. He later moved to Oregon, where he practiced law.Contents IntroductionCHAPTER I. The Colonial Period 1. Virginia customs administration 2. Massachusetts customs administration 3. New York customs administration CHAPTER II. The National Tariff Administration of the Eighteenth Century1. Customs officers 2. Entry of goods and collection of duties 3. System established by act of 1799 CHAPTER III. The Development of the System Established by the Act of 1799 up to the Civil War 1. Prevention of undervaluation 2. The auction system 3. Appraisement reforms of 1830 4. Payment of duties in cash 5. The "similitude section" and the warehouse system 6. The administrative remedy by appeal to the Secretary of the Treasury CHAPTER IV. Tariff Administration from the Civil War to 18901. Attack on the warehouse system 2. Triplicate invoices 3. Dutiable value 4. Appraisement at the port of New York5. Transportation in bond 6. Special agents and general orders 7. Searches and seizures 8. Compensation of customs officers 9. Repeal of the moieties clause 10. Repeal of discrimination against goods from the far East 11. Dutiable value and similitude section under the act of 1883 12. Classification of sugars under the act of 1883 13. Passengers' baggage CHAPTER V. The McKinley Administrative Bill of 1890 1. General purposes of the late tariff acts 2. Increased stringency of provisions to prevent fraud 3. Remedies against appraisement and classification 4. Abolition of damage allowances 5. Manufacturing in bond and drawbacks 6. Abolition of fees CONCLUSION. General Tendencies of Tariff Administration in the United States

A Comprehensive History of the Tariff System in the United States Goss traces the tariff system through three avatars that often existed simultaneously: protective, preventive and punitive. From an ineffective colonial system that allowed importers to avoid payment through extended credit arrangements, to a somewhat less troubled system that demanded immediate cash payments in the early 1840s, to a punitive system designed to stymie smugglers during the Civil War, the collection of tariff duties was always problematic. This problem was enhanced in the wake of industrialization and protectionism when direct taxes began to supplant indirect taxation as the major source of government finance. Reviewing the history of American tariff regulation, Goss discerns a gradual process towards "more stringent supervision, regulation and control" (88). Originally published in the series Studies in History, Economics and Public Law edited by the Political Science Faculty of Columbia University. John Dean Goss (1869-?) served as a judge in Wisconsin. He later moved to Oregon, where he practiced law. Contents Introduction CHAPTER I. The Colonial Period 1. Virginia customs administration 2. Massachusetts customs administration 3. New York customs administration CHAPTER II. The National Tariff Administration of the Eighteenth Century 1. Customs officers 2. Entry of goods and collection of duties 3. System established by act of 1799 CHAPTER III. The Development of the System Established by the Act of 1799 up to the Civil War 1. Prevention of undervaluation 2. The auction system 3. Appraisement reforms of 1830 4. Payment of duties in cash 5. The "similitude section" and the warehouse system 6. The administrative remedy by appeal to the Secretary of the Treasury CHAPTER IV. Tariff Administration from the Civil War to 1890 1. Attack on the warehouse system 2. Triplicate invoices 3. Dutiable value 4. Appraisement at the port of New York 5. Transportation in bond 6. Special agents and general orders 7. Searches and seizures 8. Compensation of customs officers 9. Repeal of the moieties clause 10. Repeal of discrimination against goods from the far East 11. Dutiable value and similitude section under the act of 1883 12. Classification of sugars under the act of 1883 13. Passengers' baggage CHAPTER V. The McKinley Administrative Bill of 1890 1. General purposes of the late tariff acts 2. Increased stringency of provisions to prevent fraud 3. Remedies against appraisement and classification 4. Abolition of damage allowances 5. Manufacturing in bond and drawbacks 6. Abolition of fees CONCLUSION. General Tendencies of Tariff Administration in the United States

The Making of the Modern Law: Legal Treatises, 1800-1926 includes over 20,000 analytical, theoretical and practical works on American and British Law. It includes the writings of major legal theorists, including Sir Edward Coke, Sir William Blackstone, James Fitzjames Stephen, Frederic William Maitland, John Marshall, Joseph Story, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. and Roscoe Pound, among others. Legal Treatises includes casebooks, local practice manuals, form books, works for lay readers, pamphlets, letters, speeches and other works of the most influential writers of their time. It is of great value to researchers of domestic and international law, government and politics, legal history, business and economics, criminology and much more.++++The below data was compiled from various identification fields in the bibliographic record of this title. This data is provided as an additional tool in helping to insure edition identification: ++++Harvard Law School Libraryocm12567784First published in 1891 as a doctor's thesis at Columbia University.New York: Columbia University, 1897. vi, 89 p.; 23 cm.