This timely and thought-provoking work analyses the conduct of Mexico's international trade litigation from 1986 to 2007. The book provides a concrete perspective on how Mexico has been using the legal procedures available to adjudicate its international trade rights, giving the reader a first-hand experience on international trade litigation. When litigating trade disputes, Mexico must work within a specific regulatory framework that is both multilateral (World Trade Organization (WTO)) and bilateral (Preferential Trade Agreements such as the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)). Its involvement is constrained domestically by its administrative capacity, which in turn imposes a need to prioritize, in the light of political economy, which disputes to pursue and how far. In addition: It exhaustively examines all cases providing a well-reasoned explanation of Mexico's conduct and achievements (inputs and outputs). It assesses the value of a favourable Panel/Appellate Body report (findings won) in light of implementation, based on Mexico's data. It presents observations on the increasing or decreasing initial bargaining power through the utilization of legal remedies. It touches on the regional and multilateral interaction of substantive law, procedural law and legal remedies.