|
Showing 1 - 5 of
5 matches in All Departments
This book offers an unprecedented, integrative account of the shape
of social order on the microsocial level. Dealing with the basic
dimensions of interaction, the authors examine the major factors
which influence "structure" in social interaction by applying
various theoretical concepts. Although the concept of
"microsociology" is usually associated with symbolic
interactionism, social psychology, the works of George Herbert Mead
and Erving Goffman and with qualitative methodologies, this book
reaches beyond interactionist theories, claiming that no single
school of thought covers the different dimensions necessary for
understanding the basics of microsociology. As such, the book
provides something of a microsociologist's "tool kit," analyzing an
array of theoretical approaches which offer the best conceptual
solutions, and interpreting them in a way that is independent of
their specific theoretical language. Such theoretical traditions
include systems theory, conversation analysis, structuralism, the
theory of knowledge and the philosophy of language. Providing a
distinct, systematic and incremental approach to the subject, this
book fills an important gap in sociological literature. Written in
an accessible style, and offering new insights into the area of
microsociology, it will appeal to students and scholars of the
social sciences and to those with interests in sociology,
microsociology, interactionism and sociological theory.
This book offers an unprecedented, integrative account of the shape
of social order on the microsocial level. Dealing with the basic
dimensions of interaction, the authors examine the major factors
which influence "structure" in social interaction by applying
various theoretical concepts. Although the concept of
"microsociology" is usually associated with symbolic
interactionism, social psychology, the works of George Herbert Mead
and Erving Goffman and with qualitative methodologies, this book
reaches beyond interactionist theories, claiming that no single
school of thought covers the different dimensions necessary for
understanding the basics of microsociology. As such, the book
provides something of a microsociologist's "tool kit," analyzing an
array of theoretical approaches which offer the best conceptual
solutions, and interpreting them in a way that is independent of
their specific theoretical language. Such theoretical traditions
include systems theory, conversation analysis, structuralism, the
theory of knowledge and the philosophy of language. Providing a
distinct, systematic and incremental approach to the subject, this
book fills an important gap in sociological literature. Written in
an accessible style, and offering new insights into the area of
microsociology, it will appeal to students and scholars of the
social sciences and to those with interests in sociology,
microsociology, interactionism and sociological theory.
Der zentrale Ansatz der Mikrosoziologie ist, dass soziale
Strukturen ihr Fundament in den konkreten Handlungen konkreter
Personen haben. Dabei ist die Annahme leitend, dass das, was in
Interaktionen, was in unserem alltaglichen wie ausseralltaglichen
Handeln in den verschiedensten Situationen geschieht, nicht
zufallig, beliebig oder immer nur 'individuell' ist. Vielmehr lasst
sich eine Vielzahl von Strukturen ausmachen, von Mustern, die uber
die Einzigartigkeit der je konkreten Interaktionsereignisse
hinausgehen. In dieser Einfuhrung wird das begriffliche
Instrumentarium fur die Analyse von Prozessen der Strukturbildung
in Interaktionen bereitgestellt. Es werden Aspekte behandelt, die
jeder konkreten Interaktion vorgangig sind, seien es universale
Mechanismen (z. B. der formalen Organisation von Interaktion),
denen sich Interaktion nicht entziehen kann, seien es
gesellschaftsspezifische Strukturvorgaben (z. B. Rollen und
Normen), mit denen Interaktion zumindest rechnen muss (und kann).
Welche Bedeutung haben Geschlechterdifferenzierungen im Berufsfeld
Familienrecht? Die Befunde zu Verteilungsdaten und
Segregationseffekten, zu Berufsbiografien und Karriereverlaufen
sowie zur familienrechtlichen Fallbearbeitung zeigen, dass
Geschlecht als differenzierende Dimension von ubiquitarer Bedeutung
ist, ohne Differenzen im klassischen Sinne deterministisch zu
produzieren. "Geschlecht als konstitutives Element sozialer
Strukturierung" versus "Neutralisierung und Kontextualisierung"
erweisen sich als falsche Alternative und mussen in ein
differenzierteres Konzept uberfuhrt werden.
|
|