Welcome to Loot.co.za!
Sign in / Register |Wishlists & Gift Vouchers |Help | Advanced search
|
Your cart is empty |
|||
Showing 1 - 2 of 2 matches in All Departments
There is universal agreement that 'something must be done' about
child abuse, that the legal and policy frameworks established for
the protection of children are inadequate. Time and again this is
brought home by cases that reveal major failures in the
investigation and prosecution of child abuse suspects. There is
much less clarity about what qualifies as child abuse and what
should be done about it. Failings in the law are often invoked by
politicians and the media at times of crisis, when a societal
response is demanded. The presence of new legislation on the
statute book or the creation of rules and protocols which
professionals must follow is one socially acceptable sign that the
problem has been recognized and that an effective response has been
implemented. Are these ad hoc responses helpful? If not, what
should be done to address the current weaknesses in the protection
of children?
Whilst there may be universal agreement that 'something must be done' about child abuse, there is much less clarity about what qualifies as child abuse and what should be done about it. Policy makers often invoke the law at times of crisis which are seen to demand a societal response. The presence of legislation on the statute book or the creation of rules and protocols which professionals must follow is one socially acceptable sign that the problem has been recognised and that an effective response has been implemented. In the last two decades of the twentieth century, the numerous controversies about the response of public agencies and the courts to allegations of child abuse, as well as campaigns to reform the treatment of child witnesses in adversarial trial systems, provided the impetus for legal reform in both criminal and civil proceedings in England and Wales. These legal initiatives were ad hoc responses to specific problems, and not part of a coherent and integrated programme of reform across the criminal and civil systems. Legislators and the courts in family, criminal, and tort proceedings have constructed different liability and evidential rules in parallel rather than in tandem with the other courts adjudicating the same issues, and often regarding the same child. Similarly reforms in other common law jurisdictions have often been only partially understood by lawmakers in England and Wales. This book looks across the legal and geographical boundaries within which the legal discussion of child abuse is usually confined. It considers the themes and policy considerations driving each form of legal response to the problem of child abuse. It also provides a detailed discussion of the law governing the trial of allegations of child abuse in the key areas of family, criminal and tort law in English law, and compares this with the approaches in other common law jurisdictions using the adversarial mode of trial, in particular in Canada, the United States, New Zealand and Australia. In its breadth and depth, Child Abuse Law and Policy Across Boundaries marks a significant contribution to the rapidly evolving field of child protection law.
|
You may like...
Discovering Daniel - Finding Our Hope In…
Amir Tsarfati, Rick Yohn
Paperback
|