0
Your cart

Your cart is empty

Browse All Departments
  • All Departments
Price
  • R250 - R500 (1)
  • -
Status
Brand

Showing 1 - 1 of 1 matches in All Departments

Flying Reactors - The Political Feasibility of Nuclear Power in Space: CADRE Paper No. 22 (Paperback): Wing Commander Raaf,... Flying Reactors - The Political Feasibility of Nuclear Power in Space: CADRE Paper No. 22 (Paperback)
Wing Commander Raaf, Anthony Forestier, Lieutenant Colonel Usaf, David Miller; Contributions by Air Univers Press
R403 Discovery Miles 4 030 Ships in 18 - 22 working days

One of the challenges Gen. John P. Jumper, Chief of Staff of the Air Force, sends to Air Force students, researchers, and staff offices is to investigate future concepts of operations (CONOPS). One in particular relates to this study, the CONOPS for space and command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance. The Air Force is very sensitive about incorporating new technology into its operations. While the authors advocate a feasibility study for reactor sin space in a CONOPS, they also explore a deeper problem with widespread theoretical employment of nuclear technology in space. They point first to the mission enabling advantages of nuclear reactors in space - factors like light weight, high power, long life, and potentially lower costs. A reactor would supply electrical power to a space vehicle and perhaps provide ionic or electrical propulsion. They see that nuclear-powered spacecraft would serve long-range National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) missions as well as permit effective hyperspectral satellites that would have profound benefits for the Department of Defense. The limiting factors for nuclear power in space are a compelling mission requirement and broad acceptance in popular support. The first factor is rather obvious but the second is driven by a broad-based fear of risks in the employment of nuclear technology. Many have general doubts about such an undertaking. Some opponents perceive cataclysmic dangers. A failure of space launch carrying nuclear systems would produce something on the order of a "dirty" nuclear bomb. Opponents are rigorous in their protest. Two things were clear to these researchers. One, nuclear space developers must convince the public that they are capable of developing a safe and robust system. Two, because the political battle is primarily over perceived risks rather than empirically based understanding, employment of value-focused decision strategy is necessary to convince the public and congressional leaders of the feasibility of a space nuclear program.

Free Delivery
Pinterest Twitter Facebook Google+
You may like...
100 Mandela Moments
Kate Sidley Paperback R260 R232 Discovery Miles 2 320
Student Feedback - The Cornerstone to an…
Chenicheri Sid Nair, Patricie Mertova Paperback R1,457 Discovery Miles 14 570
Legkaart van 'n Jong Lewe - Essays Oor…
Dolf van Niekerk Paperback R250 Discovery Miles 2 500
Nature Anatomy Guided Journal for Kids…
Kristine Brown Paperback R298 R279 Discovery Miles 2 790
The Life and Letters of Washington…
Pierre Munroe Irving Paperback R639 Discovery Miles 6 390
The Adventures of Glibb Redundant - New…
Ken Blanton Hardcover R409 Discovery Miles 4 090
The Ghostly Tales of the Treasure Coast
Selena Fragassi Paperback R295 R275 Discovery Miles 2 750
Optimizing IEEE 802.11i Resource and…
Parisa Dr. Naraei, I.S. Dr. Amiri, … Paperback R1,269 Discovery Miles 12 690
Modern Principles, Practices, and…
Brij B. Gupta Hardcover R5,324 Discovery Miles 53 240
CompTIA Security+ Guide To Network…
Mark Ciampa Paperback R1,335 R1,242 Discovery Miles 12 420

 

Partners