0
Your cart

Your cart is empty

Browse All Departments
  • All Departments
Price
  • R250 - R500 (1)
  • -
Status
Brand

Showing 1 - 1 of 1 matches in All Departments

Flying Reactors - The Political Feasibility of Nuclear Power in Space: CADRE Paper No. 22 (Paperback): Wing Commander Raaf,... Flying Reactors - The Political Feasibility of Nuclear Power in Space: CADRE Paper No. 22 (Paperback)
Wing Commander Raaf, Anthony Forestier, Lieutenant Colonel Usaf, David Miller; Contributions by Air Univers Press
R424 Discovery Miles 4 240 Ships in 10 - 15 working days

One of the challenges Gen. John P. Jumper, Chief of Staff of the Air Force, sends to Air Force students, researchers, and staff offices is to investigate future concepts of operations (CONOPS). One in particular relates to this study, the CONOPS for space and command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance. The Air Force is very sensitive about incorporating new technology into its operations. While the authors advocate a feasibility study for reactor sin space in a CONOPS, they also explore a deeper problem with widespread theoretical employment of nuclear technology in space. They point first to the mission enabling advantages of nuclear reactors in space - factors like light weight, high power, long life, and potentially lower costs. A reactor would supply electrical power to a space vehicle and perhaps provide ionic or electrical propulsion. They see that nuclear-powered spacecraft would serve long-range National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) missions as well as permit effective hyperspectral satellites that would have profound benefits for the Department of Defense. The limiting factors for nuclear power in space are a compelling mission requirement and broad acceptance in popular support. The first factor is rather obvious but the second is driven by a broad-based fear of risks in the employment of nuclear technology. Many have general doubts about such an undertaking. Some opponents perceive cataclysmic dangers. A failure of space launch carrying nuclear systems would produce something on the order of a "dirty" nuclear bomb. Opponents are rigorous in their protest. Two things were clear to these researchers. One, nuclear space developers must convince the public that they are capable of developing a safe and robust system. Two, because the political battle is primarily over perceived risks rather than empirically based understanding, employment of value-focused decision strategy is necessary to convince the public and congressional leaders of the feasibility of a space nuclear program.

Free Delivery
Pinterest Twitter Facebook Google+
You may like...
Cable Guys Controller and Smartphone…
R399 R359 Discovery Miles 3 590
Bosch GBM 320 Professional Drill…
R779 R447 Discovery Miles 4 470
Carbon City Zero - A Collaborative Board…
Rami Niemi Game R656 Discovery Miles 6 560
Wonder Plant Food Stix - Premium Plant…
R49 R41 Discovery Miles 410
Shield Anti Freeze/Summer Cooolant 96…
R86 Discovery Miles 860
Portraits From The Pandemic
Karin-Therese Howell Paperback R260 R49 Discovery Miles 490
Beyond Diplomacy - My Life Of Remarkable…
Riaan Eksteen Paperback R473 Discovery Miles 4 730
Marltons Sheepskin Pet Cushion - Small…
R455 R337 Discovery Miles 3 370
Garnier Even & Matte Vitamin C Day Cream…
R86 R78 Discovery Miles 780
Frozen - Blu-Ray + DVD
Blu-ray disc R344 Discovery Miles 3 440

 

Partners