Across the globe guilt has become a contentious issue in discussions over historical accountability and reparation for past injustices. Guilt has become political, and it assumes a highly visible place in the public sphere and academic debate in fields ranging from cultural memory, to transitional justice, post-colonialism, Africana studies, and the study of populist extremism. This volume argues that guilt is a productive force that helps to balance unequal power dynamics between individuals and groups. Moreover, guilt can also be an ambivalent force affecting social cohesion, moral revolutions, political negotiation, artistic creativity, legal innovation, and other forms of transformations. With chapters bridging the social sciences, law, and humanities, chapter authors examine the role and function of guilt in society and present case studies from seven national contexts. The book approaches guilt as a generative and enduring presence in societies and cultures rather than as an oppressive and destructive burden that necessitates quick release and liberation. It also considers guilt as something that legitimates the future infliction of violence. Finally, it examines the conditions under which guilt promotes transformation, repair, and renewal of relationships.

In den letzten Jahrzehnten hat die heftige Auseinandersetzung um die Literaturgeschichte offenbar nur geringfugig dazu beigetragen, dass ihr in den Debatten der Philologien noch ein gehobener Stellenwert eingeraumt wurde. Die Literaturgeschichte galt als tot. Immer aber war sie prasent in einer Fulle literaturgeschichtlicher Einfuhrungsbande, die sich heute vor allem an die Studierenden in den Bachelorstudiengangen richten. Dies scheint den Befund nahezulegen, dass die Literaturgeschichte nach wie vor einen zentralen Bestandteil literaturwissenschaftlicher Forschung und Lehre ausmacht. In jungerer Zeit aber ist eine Wiederbelebung nicht allein der Theoriedebatte um die Literaturgeschichte, sondern auch praktischer Unternehmungen im Feld zu beobachten. In diesem Band werden diese UEberlegungen wiederaufgenommen und fortgefuhrt. Die BeitragerInnen sichten den Bestand an diagnostizierten theoretischen Problemen, und diskutieren neue Modelle und Konzepte der Literaturgeschichtsschreibungen an konkreten Epochen, ihren Zasuren und literarturhistorischen Kontinuitaten.

Across the globe guilt has become a contentious issue in discussions over historical accountability and reparation for past injustices. Guilt has become political, and it assumes a highly visible place in the public sphere and academic debate in fields ranging from cultural memory, to transitional justice, post-colonialism, Africana studies, and the study of populist extremism. This volume argues that guilt is a productive force that helps to balance unequal power dynamics between individuals and groups. Moreover, guilt can also be an ambivalent force affecting social cohesion, moral revolutions, political negotiation, artistic creativity, legal innovation, and other forms of transformations. With chapters bridging the social sciences, law, and humanities, chapter authors examine the role and function of guilt in society and present case studies from seven national contexts. The book approaches guilt as a generative and enduring presence in societies and cultures rather than as an oppressive and destructive burden that necessitates quick release and liberation. It also considers guilt as something that legitimates the future infliction of violence. Finally, it examines the conditions under which guilt promotes transformation, repair, and renewal of relationships.

The book contains studies in the exchange relationship between literary and academic discourse, with an emphasis on the period from approx. 1750 to approx. 1830. The authors dealt with include F. A. Wolf, J. G. Herder, F. Schlegel, Achim v. Arnim, the Brothers Grimm and Goethe. The focal point is the question of how literature reacts to becoming the object of academic study itself. In this debate, the main point at issue is the function of literature as a central medium for the creation of tradition. Here the debate also links on with the present-day academic discussion on the philological rollback in literary studies.