|
Showing 1 - 9 of
9 matches in All Departments
Charting the experiences of internally or externally migrant
communities, the volume examines social transformation through the
dynamic relationship between movement, reproduction, and health.
The chapters examine how healthcare experiences of migrants are not
only embedded in their own unique health worldviews, but also
influenced by the history, policy, and politics of the wider state
systems. The research among migrant communities an understanding of
how ideas of reproduction and "cultures of health" travel, how
healing, birth and care practices become a result of movement, and
how health-related perceptions and reproductive experiences can
define migrant belonging and identity.
Set in the context of the processes and practices of human
reproduction and reproductive health in Northern India, this book
examines the institutional exercise of power by the state, caste
and kin groups. Drawing on ethnographic research over the past
eighteen years among poor Hindu and Muslim communities in Rajasthan
and among development and health actors in the state, this book
contributes to developing analytic perspectives on reproductive
practice, agency and the body-self as particular and novel sites of
a vital power and politic. Rajasthan has been among the poorest
states in the country with high levels of maternal and infant
mortality and morbidity. The author closely examines how social and
economic inequalities are produced and sustained in discursive and
on the ground contexts of family-making, how authoritative
knowledge and power in the domain of childbirth is exercised across
a landscape of development institutions, how maternal health
becomes a category of citizenship, how health-seeking is socially
and emotionally determined and political in nature, how the health
sector operates as a biopolitical system, and how diverse moral
claims over the fertile, infertile and reproductive body-self are
asserted, contested and often realised. A compelling analysis, this
book offers both new empirical data and new theoretical insights.
It draws together the practices, experiences and discourse on
fertility and reproduction (childbirth, infertility, loss) in
Northern India into an overarching analytical framework on power
and gender politics. It will be of interest to academics in the
fields of medical anthropology, medical sociology, public health,
gender studies, human rights and sociolegal studies, and South
Asian studies.
Set in the context of the processes and practices of human
reproduction and reproductive health in Northern India, this book
examines the institutional exercise of power by the state, caste
and kin groups. Drawing on ethnographic research over the past
eighteen years among poor Hindu and Muslim communities in Rajasthan
and among development and health actors in the state, this book
contributes to developing analytic perspectives on reproductive
practice, agency and the body-self as particular and novel sites of
a vital power and politic. Rajasthan has been among the poorest
states in the country with high levels of maternal and infant
mortality and morbidity. The author closely examines how social and
economic inequalities are produced and sustained in discursive and
on the ground contexts of family-making, how authoritative
knowledge and power in the domain of childbirth is exercised across
a landscape of development institutions, how maternal health
becomes a category of citizenship, how health-seeking is socially
and emotionally determined and political in nature, how the health
sector operates as a biopolitical system, and how diverse moral
claims over the fertile, infertile and reproductive body-self are
asserted, contested and often realised. A compelling analysis, this
book offers both new empirical data and new theoretical insights.
It draws together the practices, experiences and discourse on
fertility and reproduction (childbirth, infertility, loss) in
Northern India into an overarching analytical framework on power
and gender politics. It will be of interest to academics in the
fields of medical anthropology, medical sociology, public health,
gender studies, human rights and sociolegal studies, and South
Asian studies.
Obesity is a rising global health problem. On the one hand a
clearly defined medical condition, it is at the same time a
corporeal state embedded in the social and cultural perception of
fatness, body shape and size. Focusing specifically on the maternal
body, contributors to the volume examine how the language and
notions of obesity connect with, or stand apart from, wider
societal values and moralities to do with the body, fatness,
reproduction and what is considered 'natural'. A focus on fatness
in the context of human reproduction and motherhood offers
instructive insights into the global circulation and authority of
biomedical facts on fatness (as 'risky' anti-fit, for example). As
with other social and cultural studies critical of health policy
discourse, this volume challenges the spontaneous connection being
made in scientific and popular understanding between fatness and
ill health.
Through an 'ethnography of ethnographers', this volume explores the
varied ways in which anthropologists become and remain attracted to
the discipline. The contributors reflect on the initial
preconceptions, assumptions and expectations of themselves as young
anthropologists, and on the ways in which early decisions are made
about fieldwork and about the selection of field locations. They
question how fieldworkers come to understand what anthropology is,
both as a profession and as a personal experience, through their
commitments in the field, in academic departments and in contexts
where their 'specialist knowledge' is called upon and applied. They
discuss the nature of reflexivity that emerges out of
anthropological practices, and the ways in which this reflexivity
affects ethnographic practices. Providing reflections on fieldwork
in such diverse places as Alaska, Melanesia, New York and India,
the volume critically reflects on the field as a culturally
constructed site, with blurred boundaries that allow the personal
and the professional to permeate each other. It addresses the
'politics of location' that shape the anthropologists' involvement
in 'the field', in teaching rooms, in development projects and in
activist engagements. The journeys described extend beyond 'the
field' and into inter-disciplinary projects, commissions, colleges
and personal spheres. These original and critical contributions
provide fascinating insights into the relationship between
anthropologists and the nature of the discipline.
Recent years have seen many changes in human reproduction resulting
from state and medical interventions in childbearing processes.
Based on empirical work in a variety of societies and countries,
this volume considers the relationship between reproductive
processes (of fertility, pregnancy, childbirth and the postpartum
period) on the one hand and attitudes, medical technologies and
state health policies in diverse cultural contexts on the other.
Maya Unnithan-Kumar is Senior Lecturer in Anthropology at the
University of Sussex. Her research in the early 1990s focused on
kinship and gender relations in northwest India and appeared as
Identity, Gender and Poverty (Berghahn Books 1997).
Recent years have seen many changes in human reproduction resulting
from state and medical interventions in childbearing processes.
Based on empirical work in a variety of societies and countries,
this volume considers the relationship between reproductive
processes (of fertility, pregnancy, childbirth and the postpartum
period) on the one hand and attitudes, medical technologies and
state health policies in diverse cultural contexts on the other.
Most studies of the so-called tribal communities in India stress
their social, economic, and political differences from communities
that are organized on the basis of caste. It was this apparent
contrast between tribal and caste lifestyle and, moreover, the
paucity of material on tribal groups, that motivated the author to
undertake this study of a poor "tribal" community, the Girasia, in
northwestern India. While carrying out her fieldwork, the author
soon became aware that the traditional tribe-caste categories
needed to be revised; in fact, she found them more often than not
to be constructs by outsiders, mostly academic. Of greater
importance for an understanding of the Girasia was the wider and
more complex issue of self-perception and identification by others
that must be seen in the context of their poverty as well as in the
strategic and shifting use of kinship, gender and class relations
in the region.
Through an 'ethnography of ethnographers', this volume explores the
varied ways in which anthropologists become and remain attracted to
the discipline. The contributors reflect on the initial
preconceptions, assumptions and expectations of themselves as young
anthropologists, and on the ways in which early decisions are made
about fieldwork and about the selection of field locations. They
question how fieldworkers come to understand what anthropology is,
both as a profession and as a personal experience, through their
commitments in the field, in academic departments and in contexts
where their 'specialist knowledge' is called upon and applied. They
discuss the nature of reflexivity that emerges out of
anthropological practices, and the ways in which this reflexivity
affects ethnographic practices. Providing reflections on fieldwork
in such diverse places as Alaska, Melanesia, New York and India,
the volume critically reflects on the field as a culturally
constructed site, with blurred boundaries that allow the personal
and the professional to permeate each other. It addresses the
'politics of location' that shape the anthropologists' involvement
in 'the field', in teaching rooms, in development projects and in
activist engagements. The journeys described extend beyond 'the
field' and into inter-disciplinary projects, commissions, colleges
and personal spheres. These original and critical contributions
provide fascinating insights into the relationship between
anthropologists and the nature of the discipline.
|
|