|
Showing 1 - 4 of
4 matches in All Departments
Philosophy and Practice in Writing a History of Ancient Israel
elucidates and examines assumptions about history writing that
current historians of ancient Israel and Judah employ. It is
undertaken in the context of the conflict between so-called
"minimalists" and "maximalists" within the discipline today. Though
the use of the Bible as evidence is the focal point of the
opposition of these two approaches, Moore shows that a number of
related philosophical and practical concerns are telescoped in this
issue, including concepts of Empiricism, Objectivity,
Representation and Language, Subject, Explanation, Truth, and
Evidence Evaluation and Use. Organized around these topics,
Philosophy and Practice aims to situate the study of ancient Israel
and Judah in the broader intellectual context of academic history
in general and to provide insight into the formative assumptions of
the current debate. It also aims to show that the central issue of
the reliability of the Bible as evidence is surrounded by related
issues that are equally important for understanding the past of
ancient Israel and Judah and writing about it. Moore shows that
ideas about objectivity in particular have a direct bearing on the
evidentiary debate, which, in turn, affects what subjects and modes
of explanations historians see as available to them. Moore argues
that current historians of ancient Israel are beginning to work
with a notion of historical truth that attempts to take into
account the many contingencies for the concept and writing of
history that twentieth-century discussions about history have
introduced.
" This volume is an inquiry into the complex relationship of the
prophetic texts and Israelite history. Taken as a whole, the book
provides a "round-table" discussion that examines the thesis that
the study of prophetic literature (i.e., Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel,
and the Twelve) and the history of Israel are best undertaken in
interaction with one another. This topic appropriately honors John
Hayes's long-standing scholarly contributions in prophetic
interpretation and historical research, as well as his interest in
the possibilities of the intersection of these two areas. The
volume also promises to contribute to the body of knowledge about
prophets and Israel's past in general by affording twenty-four
historians and prophetic scholars the opportunity to explore their
areas of interest in fresh ways while in dialogue with a central
thesis. All twenty-four contributors have engaged John's ideas
about prophets and/or history as students, colleagues, or in their
research and publications. Thus, the question of what impact the
fields of prophetic research and Israelite history can and should
have on one another unites the articles. The book's individual
parts, however, are contributions of historians and prophetic
scholars who enter the discussion from their own perspectives and
examine the possibilities and problems of the intersection of these
two topics. The articles from historians will focus on questions
about the usefulness of prophetic texts for reconstructing Israel's
history, and will also branch out and address topics such as the
social location of the prophets and the benefits of other ancient
texts, as well as archaeology, to understanding the prophets.
Scholars coming from the prophetic "side" will offer different
perspectives on prophetic identity, experience, and rhetoric, and
their possible correlations with historical contexts. These
articles will engage broad issues such as how history may form the
"context of prophets' thought" (to quote contributor J. Gordon
McConville), and will explore specific texts and issues drawn from
Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Hosea, Amos, Zechariah, along with
Daniel and Deuteronomy."
Although scholars have for centuries primarily been interested in
using the study of ancient Israel to explain, illuminate, and
clarify the biblical story, Megan Bishop Moore and Brad E. Kelle
describe how scholars today seek more and more to tell the story of
the past on its own terms, drawing from both biblical and
extrabiblical sources to illuminate ancient Israel and its
neighbors without privileging the biblical perspective.
Biblical History and Israel?'s Past provides a comprehensive survey
of how study of the Old Testament and the history of Israel has
changed since the middle of the twentieth century. Moore and Kelle
discuss significant trends in scholarship, trace the development of
ideas since the 1970s, and summarize major scholars, viewpoints,
issues, and developments.
Philosophy and Practice in Writing a History of Ancient Israel
elucidates and examines assumptions about history writing that
current historians of ancient Israel and Judah employ. It is
undertaken in the context of the conflict between so-called
"minimalists" and "maximalists" within the discipline today. Though
the use of the Bible as evidence is the focal point of the
opposition of these two approaches, Moore shows that a number of
related philosophical and practical concerns are telescoped in this
issue, including concepts of Empiricism, Objectivity,
Representation and Language, Subject, Explanation, Truth, and
Evidence Evaluation and Use. Organized around these topics,
Philosophy and Practice aims to situate the study of ancient Israel
and Judah in the broader intellectual context of academic history
in general and to provide insight into the formative assumptions of
the current debate. It also aims to show that the central issue of
the reliability of the Bible as evidence is surrounded by related
issues that are equally important for understanding the past of
ancient Israel and Judah and writing about it. Moore shows that
ideas about objectivity in particular have a direct bearing on the
evidentiary debate, which, in turn, affects what subjects and modes
of explanations historians see as available to them. Moore argues
that current historians of ancient Israel are beginning to work
with a notion of historical truth that attempts to take into
account the many contingencies for the concept and writing of
history that twentieth-century discussions about history have
introduced.
|
|