|
|
Showing 1 - 6 of
6 matches in All Departments
"Coalescent Argumentation" is based on the concept that arguments
can function from agreement, rather than disagreement. To prove
this idea, Gilbert first discusses how several
components--emotional, visceral (physical) and kisceral (intuitive)
are utilized in an argumentative setting by people everyday. These
components, also characterized as "modes," are vital to
argumentative communication because they affect both the argument
and the resulting outcome.
In addition to the components/modes, this book also stresses the
goals in argumentation as a means for understanding one's own and
one's opposer's positions. Gilbert argues that by viewing positions
as complex human events involving a variety of communicative modes,
we are better able to find commonalities across positions, and,
therefore, move from conflict to resolution. By focusing on
agreement and shared goals in all modes, arguers can coalesce
diverse positions and more easily distinguish between minor or
unrelated differences and core disagreements. This permits much
greater latitude for locating shared beliefs, values, and attitudes
that will lead to conflict resolution.
"Coalescent Argumentation" is based on the concept that arguments
can function from agreement, rather than disagreement. To prove
this idea, Gilbert first discusses how several
components--emotional, visceral (physical) and kisceral (intuitive)
are utilized in an argumentative setting by people everyday. These
components, also characterized as "modes," are vital to
argumentative communication because they affect both the argument
and the resulting outcome.
In addition to the components/modes, this book also stresses the
goals in argumentation as a means for understanding one's own and
one's opposer's positions. Gilbert argues that by viewing positions
as complex human events involving a variety of communicative modes,
we are better able to find commonalities across positions, and,
therefore, move from conflict to resolution. By focusing on
agreement and shared goals in all modes, arguers can coalesce
diverse positions and more easily distinguish between minor or
unrelated differences and core disagreements. This permits much
greater latitude for locating shared beliefs, values, and attitudes
that will lead to conflict resolution.
A practical, easy-to-read and often amusing guide that describes
how to hone your argument skills. Features contemporary examples of
debates on current topics with sidebar notes demonstrating weak and
strong techniques. Provides tools to identify and avoid the most
common verbal traps. Contains strategies for effectively making
your points during a disagreement--whether it's a formal debate or
a shouting match.
A practical, easy-to-read and often amusing guide that describes
how to hone your argument skills. Features contemporary examples of
debates on current topics with sidebar notes demonstrating weak and
strong techniques. Provides tools to identify and avoid the most
common verbal traps. Contains strategies for effectively making
your points during a disagreement--whether it's a formal debate or
a shouting match.
In Arguing with People, Michael A. Gilbert shows how recent
developments in the field of Argumentation Theory have bearing on
the arguments we encounter in everyday life. Research that had
previously been restricted to scholarly journals and monographs is
made accessible and, more importantly, useful to the reader.
Gilbert emphasises the value of understanding context,
understanding who you are arguing with and knowing how to use that
information to fruitfully settle disagreements. This book expands
the argumentative toolkit and shows how often-neglected skills such
as empathy and tone can be applied to the hurly-burly contexts of
real arguing. Interesting examples and sample dialogues are
provided to demonstrate tangible ways in which the book's lessons
can be applied. Partner exercises provide opportunities to
role-play and practise the interpersonal skills developed
throughout the book.
How to Win an Argument is designed to provide you with the tools
you need to improve your rhetorical and critical skills. Since we
constantly argue at work, home, and even in casual conversation,
improving that ability is extremely important. This book will
enable you to choose your arguments carefully and prevent you from
being misled by fallacies and empty rhetoric. It will increase your
insight and perception of the positions presented to you, decrease
your gullibility, and replace it with a healthy skepticism. The
practical information in this guide will sharpen your ears and your
mind, making it more likely that the right response will occur to
you at the right moment, rather than hours later. The third edition
contains a new chapter on emotion and additional examples for each
chapter. Using this book will aid you in communicating effectively,
avoiding conflict, and understanding the myriad arguments you are
faced with every day.
|
You may like...
Loot
Nadine Gordimer
Paperback
(2)
R367
R340
Discovery Miles 3 400
|