|
|
Showing 1 - 9 of
9 matches in All Departments
Empirical Studies in Comparative Politics presents a collection of
papers analyzing the political systems of ten nations. It intends
to provoke a conscious effort to compare, and investigate, the
public choice of comparative politics. There have been many
publications by public choice scholars, and many more by
researchers who are at least sympathetic to the public choice
perspective, yet little of this work has been integrated into the
main stream of comparative political science literature. This work,
however, presents an empirically oriented study of the politics,
bureaucratic organization, and regulated economies of particular
nations in the canon of the comparativist. It therefore provides a
public choice view at the level of nations, not of systems. This
compendium of work on comparative politics meets two criteria: In
every case, a model of human behavior or institutional impact is
specified; Also in every case, this model is confronted with data
appropriate for evaluating whether this model is useful for
understanding politics in one or more nations.
There is no unified theory that can explain both voter choice and
where choices come from. Hinich and Munger fill that gap with their
model of political communication based on ideology.
Rather than beginning with voters and diffuse, atomistic
preferences, Hinich and Munger explore why large groups of voters
share preference profiles, why they consider themselves "liberals"
or "conservatives." The reasons, they argue, lie in the twin
problems of communication and commitment that politicians face.
Voters, overloaded with information, ignore specific platform
positions. Parties and candidates therefore communicate through
simple statements of goals, analogies, and by invoking political
symbols. But politicians must also commit to pursuing the actions
implied by these analogies and symbols. Commitment requires that
ideologies be used consistently, particularly when it is not in the
party's short-run interest.
The model Hinich and Munger develop accounts for the choices of
voters, the goals of politicians, and the interests of
contributors. It is an important addition to political science and
essential reading for all in that discipline.
"Hinich and Munger's study of ideology and the theory of political
choice is a pioneering effort to integrate ideology into formal
political theory. It is a major step in directing attention toward
the way in which ideology influences the nature of political
choices." --Douglass C. North
." . . represents a significant contribution to the literature on
elections, voting behavior, and social choice." --Policy Currents
Melvin Hinich is Professor of Government, University of Texas.
Michael C. Munger is Associate Professor of Political Science,
University of North Carolina.
With the growing popularity of apps such as Uber and Airbnb, there
has been a keen interest in the rise of the sharing economy.
Michael C. Munger brings these new trends in the economy down to
earth by focusing on their relation to the fundamental economic
concept of transaction costs. In doing so Munger brings a fresh
perspective on the 'sharing economy' in clear and engaging writing
that is accessible to both general and specialist readers. He shows
how, for the first time, entrepreneurs can sell reductions in
transaction costs, rather than reductions in the costs of the
products themselves. He predicts that smartphones will be used to
commodify excess capacity, and reaches the controversial conclusion
that a basic income will be required as a consequence of this new
'transaction costs revolution'.
This book is an introduction to the logic and analytics of group
choice. To understand how political institutions work, it is
important to isolate what citizens - as individuals and as members
of society - actually want. This book develops a means of
'representing' the preferences of citizens so that institutions can
be studied more carefully. This is the first book to integrate the
classical problem of constitutions with modern spatial theory,
connecting Aristotle and Montesquieu with Arrow and Buchanan.
This book is an introduction to the logic and analytics of group
choice. To understand how political institutions work, it is
important to isolate what citizens - as individuals and as members
of society - actually want. This book develops a means of
'representing' the preferences of citizens so that institutions can
be studied more carefully. This is the first book to integrate the
classical problem of constitutions with modern spatial theory,
connecting Aristotle and Montesquieu with Arrow and Buchanan.
Empirical Studies in Comparative Politics presents a collection of
papers analyzing the political systems of ten nations. It intends
to provoke a conscious effort to compare, and investigate, the
public choice of comparative politics. There have been many
publications by public choice scholars, and many more by
researchers who are at least sympathetic to the public choice
perspective, yet little of this work has been integrated into the
main stream of comparative political science literature. This work,
however, presents an empirically oriented study of the politics,
bureaucratic organization, and regulated economies of particular
nations in the canon of the comparativist. It therefore provides a
public choice view at the level of nations, not of systems. This
compendium of work on comparative politics meets two criteria: In
every case, a model of human behavior or institutional impact is
specified; Also in every case, this model is confronted with data
appropriate for evaluating whether this model is useful for
understanding politics in one or more nations.
To 'analyse' means to break into components and understand. But new
readers find modern mathematical theories of politics so
inaccessible that analysis is difficult. Where does one start?
Analytical Politics is an introduction to analytical theories of
politics, explicitly designed both for the interested professional
and students in political science. We cannot evaluate how well
governments perform without some baseline for comparison: what
should governments be doing? This book focuses on the role of the
'center' in politics, drawing from the classical political theories
of Aristotle, Hobbes, Rousseau, and others. The main questions in
Analytical Politics involve the existence and stability of the
center; when does it exist? When should the center guide policy?
How do alternative voting rules help in discovering the center? An
understanding of the work reviewed here is essential for anyone who
hopes to evaluate the performance or predict the actions of
democratic governments.
Analytical Politics is an introduction to analytical theories of politics, explicitly designed both for the interested professional and classes in political science. We cannot evaluate how well governments perform without some baseline for comparison: What should governments be doing? This book focuses on the role of the "center" in politics, drawing from the classical political theories of Aristotle, Hobbes, Rousseau, and others. The main questions in Analytical Politics involve the existence and stability of the center: When does it exist? When should the center guide policy? An understanding of the work reviewed here is essential for anyone who hopes to evaluate the performance or predict the actions of democratic governments.
With the growing popularity of apps such as Uber and Airbnb, there
has been a keen interest in the rise of the sharing economy.
Michael C. Munger brings these new trends in the economy down to
earth by focusing on their relation to the fundamental economic
concept of transaction costs. In doing so Munger brings a fresh
perspective on the 'sharing economy' in clear and engaging writing
that is accessible to both general and specialist readers. He shows
how, for the first time, entrepreneurs can sell reductions in
transaction costs, rather than reductions in the costs of the
products themselves. He predicts that smartphones will be used to
commodify excess capacity, and reaches the controversial conclusion
that a basic income will be required as a consequence of this new
'transaction costs revolution'.
|
|