|
Showing 1 - 2 of
2 matches in All Departments
Disabled Futures makes an important intervention in disability
studies by taking an intersectional approach to race, gender, and
disability. Milo Obourn reads disability studies, gender and
sexuality studies, and critical race studies to develop a framework
for addressing inequity. They theorize the concept of "racialized
disgender"-to describe the ways in which racialization and
gendering are social processes with disabling effects-thereby
offering a new avenue for understanding race, gender, and
disability as mutually constitutive. Obourn uses readings of
literature and popular culture from Lost and Avatar to Octavia
Butler's Xenogenesis trilogy to explore and unpack specific ways
that race and gender construct-and are constructed by-historical
notions of ability and disability, sickness and health, and
successful recovery versus damaged lives. What emerges is not only
a more complex and deeper understanding of the intersections
between ableism, racism, and (cis)sexism, but also possibilities
for imagining alternate and more radically inclusive futures in
which all of our identities, experiences, freedoms, and oppressions
are understood as interdependent and intertwined.
Disabled Futures makes an important intervention in disability
studies by taking an intersectional approach to race, gender, and
disability. Milo Obourn reads disability studies, gender and
sexuality studies, and critical race studies to develop a framework
for addressing inequity. They theorize the concept of "racialized
disgender"-to describe the ways in which racialization and
gendering are social processes with disabling effects-thereby
offering a new avenue for understanding race, gender, and
disability as mutually constitutive. Obourn uses readings of
literature and popular culture from Lost and Avatar to Octavia
Butler's Xenogenesis trilogy to explore and unpack specific ways
that race and gender construct-and are constructed by-historical
notions of ability and disability, sickness and health, and
successful recovery versus damaged lives. What emerges is not only
a more complex and deeper understanding of the intersections
between ableism, racism, and (cis)sexism, but also possibilities
for imagining alternate and more radically inclusive futures in
which all of our identities, experiences, freedoms, and oppressions
are understood as interdependent and intertwined.
|
|