|
Showing 1 - 2 of
2 matches in All Departments
Some studies of ancient Roman masculinities have concentrated on
the private aspects of the subject, particularly sexuality, and
have drawn conclusions from a narrow field of reference, usually
rhetorical practice. In contrast, this 2006 book examines the
public and the most important aspect of Roman masculinity:
manliness as represented by the concept of virtus. Using
traditional historical, philological, and archaeological analyses,
together with the methods of socio-linguistics and gender studies,
it presents a comprehensive picture of how Roman manliness
developed from the middle to the late Republic. Arguing that virtus
was not, in essence, a moral concept, Myles McDonnell shows how the
semantic range of the word, together with the manly ideal that it
embodied, were altered by Greek cultural ideas; and how Roman
manliness was contested in the religion, culture, and politics of
the late Republic.
Some studies of ancient Roman masculinities have concentrated on
the private aspects of the subject, particularly sexuality, and
have drawn conclusions from a narrow field of reference, usually
rhetorical practice. In contrast, this 2006 book examines the
public and the most important aspect of Roman masculinity:
manliness as represented by the concept of virtus. Using
traditional historical, philological, and archaeological analyses,
together with the methods of socio-linguistics and gender studies,
it presents a comprehensive picture of how Roman manliness
developed from the middle to the late Republic. Arguing that virtus
was not, in essence, a moral concept, Myles McDonnell shows how the
semantic range of the word, together with the manly ideal that it
embodied, were altered by Greek cultural ideas; and how Roman
manliness was contested in the religion, culture, and politics of
the late Republic.
|
|