This is a reproduction of a book published before 1923. This book may have occasional imperfections such as missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. that were either part of the original artifact, or were introduced by the scanning process. We believe this work is culturally important, and despite the imperfections, have elected to bring it back into print as part of our continuing commitment to the preservation of printed works worldwide. We appreciate your understanding of the imperfections in the preservation process, and hope you enjoy this valuable book. ++++ The below data was compiled from various identification fields in the bibliographic record of this title. This data is provided as an additional tool in helping to ensure edition identification: ++++ Precedents, Or Practical Forms In Actions At Law In The Supreme Court Of The State Of New York: The Superior Court And Court Of Common Pleas, For The City Of New York, Adapted To The Code And Rules Of 1871, And To The Practice Of States Having A Similar Code; With The Forms In Proceedings ... 3 Henry Strong McCall, New York (State). Supreme Court, New York (State). Superior Court (New York), New York (State). Court of Common Pleas (City and County of New York) Banks and Brothers, 1871 Law; Civil Procedure; Forms (Law); Law / Civil Procedure

This is a reproduction of a book published before 1923. This book may have occasional imperfections such as missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. that were either part of the original artifact, or were introduced by the scanning process. We believe this work is culturally important, and despite the imperfections, have elected to bring it back into print as part of our continuing commitment to the preservation of printed works worldwide. We appreciate your understanding of the imperfections in the preservation process, and hope you enjoy this valuable book. ++++ The below data was compiled from various identification fields in the bibliographic record of this title. This data is provided as an additional tool in helping to ensure edition identification: ++++ New York Superior Court Reports; Volume 37 Of Reports Of Cases Argued And Determined In The Superior Court Of The City Of New York 1871-1892]; New York (State). Superior Court (New York) New York (State). Superior Court (New York), James Clark Spencer, Samuel Jones Diossy & company, 1874 Law; General; Law / General; Law / Reference; Law reports, digests, etc

This is a reproduction of a book published before 1923. This book may have occasional imperfections such as missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. that were either part of the original artifact, or were introduced by the scanning process. We believe this work is culturally important, and despite the imperfections, have elected to bring it back into print as part of our continuing commitment to the preservation of printed works worldwide. We appreciate your understanding of the imperfections in the preservation process, and hope you enjoy this valuable book. ++++ The below data was compiled from various identification fields in the bibliographic record of this title. This data is provided as an additional tool in helping to ensure edition identification: ++++ New York Superior Court Reports; Volume 36 Of Reports Of Cases Argued And Determined In The Superior Court Of The City Of New York 1871-1892]; New York (State). Superior Court (New York) New York (State). Superior Court (New York), James Clark Spencer, Samuel Jones Diossy & company, 1874 Law; General; Law / General; Law / Reference; Law reports, digests, etc

This is a reproduction of a book published before 1923. This book may have occasional imperfections such as missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. that were either part of the original artifact, or were introduced by the scanning process. We believe this work is culturally important, and despite the imperfections, have elected to bring it back into print as part of our continuing commitment to the preservation of printed works worldwide. We appreciate your understanding of the imperfections in the preservation process, and hope you enjoy this valuable book. ++++ The below data was compiled from various identification fields in the bibliographic record of this title. This data is provided as an additional tool in helping to ensure edition identification: ++++ Gardiner G.Howland, Isaac Roosevelt And Harriet Roosevelt, Executors, &c. Of James Roosevelt, Deceased Vs. The Union Theological Seminary In The City Of New York And James Roosevelt Bayley: Opinion Of The Court John Duer, New York (State). Superior Court (New York), James Roosevelt Bayley, Union Theological Seminary (New York, N.Y.) W.C.Bryant & co., 1849

This is an EXACT reproduction of a book published before 1923. This IS NOT an OCR'd book with strange characters, introduced typographical errors, and jumbled words. This book may have occasional imperfections such as missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. that were either part of the original artifact, or were introduced by the scanning process. We believe this work is culturally important, and despite the imperfections, have elected to bring it back into print as part of our continuing commitment to the preservation of printed works worldwide. We appreciate your understanding of the imperfections in the preservation process, and hope you enjoy this valuable book.