Welcome to Loot.co.za!
Sign in / Register |Wishlists & Gift Vouchers |Help | Advanced search
|
Your cart is empty |
|||
Showing 1 - 3 of 3 matches in All Departments
The problem of free will is one of the great perennial issues of
philosophy and has been discussed and debated over many centuries.
The issues that arise in this sphere cover both metaphysics and
morals and concern matters of central importance not only for
philosophy but also for law, theology, psychology and the social
sciences. What is at stake here is nothing less than our self-image
as responsible moral agents who are in control of our own destiny
and fate. The investigations and findings of modern science are
judged by many to put skeptical pressure on this self-image and may
challenge its credibility. During the past few decades the free
will controversy has developed and evolved in exciting and
significant ways. All the major parties involved in this debate
have had to revise and amend their core positions with a view to
responding to the sophisticated and searching arguments put forward
by their critics and opponents.
In Naturally Free Action, Oisin Deery argues that free will exists, where free will is understood as the ability to act freely, and free actions as exercises of that ability. Deery reaches his conclusion by showing how the concept of free will plausibly refers to many actual human behaviors, and how these behaviors count as a natural category or kind. Deery also addresses the role of phenomenology in fixing the reference of the concept, arguing that our phenomenology as of deciding or acting freely is typically accurate, even if determinism is true. The result is a realist, naturalistic framework for theorizing about free will, according to which free will almost certainly exists and we act freely. Deery's position mostly sidesteps the question of whether free will is compatible with determinism. Even so, Deery maintains that his natural-kind view about free will supports compatibilism and provides compatibilists with an attractive way to be realists about free will. Deery also responds to recent empirical threats to free will, including those posed by findings about behaviors caused by implicit biases. Finally, Deery shows how his view possesses the resources to address emerging questions about whether artificially intelligent agents might ever act freely or be responsible for their behaviors, and if so in what sense.
The problem of free will is one of the great perennial issues of
philosophy and has been discussed and debated over many centuries.
The issues that arise in this sphere cover both metaphysics and
morals and concern matters of central importance not only for
philosophy but also for law, theology, psychology and the social
sciences. What is at stake here is nothing less than our self-image
as responsible moral agents who are in control of our own destiny
and fate. The investigations and findings of modern science are
judged by many to put skeptical pressure on this self-image and may
challenge its credibility. During the past few decades the free
will controversy has developed and evolved in exciting and
significant ways. All the major parties involved in this debate
have had to revise and amend their core positions with a view to
responding to the sophisticated and searching arguments put forward
by their critics and opponents.
|
You may like...
|