|
|
Showing 1 - 3 of
3 matches in All Departments
There are many different forms of rationality. In current economic
discourse the main focus is on instrumental rationality and
optimizing, while organization scholars, behavioural economists and
policy scientists focus more on bounded rationality and
satisficing. The interplay with value rationality or expressive
rationality is mainly discussed in philosophy and sociology, but
never in an empirical way. This book shows that not one, but three
different forms of rationality (subjective, social and
instrumental) determine the final outcomes of strategic decisions
executed by major organizations. Based on an argumentation analysis
of six high-profile public debates, this book adds nuance to the
concept of bounded rationality. The chapters show how it is
socially constructed, and thus dependent on shared beliefs or
knowledge, institutional context and personal interests. Three
double case studies investigating the three rationalities
illustrate how decision makers and stakeholders discuss the
appropriateness of these rationalities for making decisions in
different practice contexts. The first touches more on personal
concerns, like wearing a niqab or looking at obscene art exposed in
a public environment; the second investigates debates on improving
the rights and position of specific minorities; and the third is
based on the agreement on instrumental reasons for two kinds of
investments, but the cost arguments are regarded less relevant when
social norms or personal interests are violated. The Social
Construction of Rationality is for those who study political
economy, economic psychology and public policy, as well as economic
theory and philosophy.
There are many different forms of rationality. In current economic
discourse the main focus is on instrumental rationality and
optimizing, while organization scholars, behavioural economists and
policy scientists focus more on bounded rationality and
satisficing. The interplay with value rationality or expressive
rationality is mainly discussed in philosophy and sociology, but
never in an empirical way. This book shows that not one, but three
different forms of rationality (subjective, social and
instrumental) determine the final outcomes of strategic decisions
executed by major organizations. Based on an argumentation analysis
of six high-profile public debates, this book adds nuance to the
concept of bounded rationality. The chapters show how it is
socially constructed, and thus dependent on shared beliefs or
knowledge, institutional context and personal interests. Three
double case studies investigating the three rationalities
illustrate how decision makers and stakeholders discuss the
appropriateness of these rationalities for making decisions in
different practice contexts. The first touches more on personal
concerns, like wearing a niqab or looking at obscene art exposed in
a public environment; the second investigates debates on improving
the rights and position of specific minorities; and the third is
based on the agreement on instrumental reasons for two kinds of
investments, but the cost arguments are regarded less relevant when
social norms or personal interests are violated. The Social
Construction of Rationality is for those who study political
economy, economic psychology and public policy, as well as economic
theory and philosophy.
This open access book offers four ways to enrich traditional
research methods in business ethics. By looking at critical jokes
and cartoons on management consultants, their business practice and
their clients' demands, many ethical transgressions in business get
addressed. By illustrating and criticizing such transgression,
jokes can serve as an example in a theoretical argument, as a
prompt to reflect on in an open interview, as a statement to assess
in an enquiry or as basis for qualitative content analysis. By
adding jokes to the conversation on ethical transgressions in
business much depth and honesty can be added, resulting in better
research data. Jokes can help to surpass social desirability bias
included in answers given in traditional interview settings or
enquiries. This book is of interest to consultants, researchers,
educators and students in business ethics and management. The book
showcases what kind of practical and ethical wisdom is embedded in
business jokes and how this knowledge can be made productive in the
context of business ethics.
|
|