|
Showing 1 - 5 of
5 matches in All Departments
Offers an examination of ancient, modern, and contemporary
political theories and practices in order to develop a more
expansive way of conceptualizing memory, how political power
influences the presence of the past, and memory'songoing impact on
democratic horizons. George Orwell famously argued that those who
control the past control the future, and those who control the
present control the past. In this study of the relationship between
democracy and memory, P. J. Brendese examines Orwell'sinsight,
revealing how political power affects what is available to be
remembered, who is allowed to recall the past, and when and where
past events can be commemorated. Engaging a diverse panoply of
thinkers that includes Sophocles, Friedrich Nietzsche, Jacques
Derrida, James Baldwin, and Toni Morrison, Brendese considers the
role of disavowed memory and the politics of collective memory in
democratic processes throughout history. Among the cases treatedare
democracy in ancient Athens, South Africa's effort to transition
from apartheid via its landmark Truth and Reconciliation
Commission, Mexico's struggle to fortify democratic accountability
after the "dirty war," and the unresolved legacy of slavery in US
race relations. The Power of Memory in Democratic Politics draws on
these national histories to develop a theory of memory that
accounts for the ways the past lives on in unconscious, habituated
practices, shaping the possibilities of freedom, action, and
political imagination. P. J. Brendese is assistant professor of
political science at Johns Hopkins University.
For better or worse, the ancient Greeks retain their cultural,
political, and philosophical authority for contemporary educators
and actors. Maureen Dowd has talked about the Hellenization of the
Bush administration, Thucydides has been used as a template to
analyze the Iraqi War and the War on Terror, Greek drama has been
repeatedly performed in sometimes spectacular if unconventional
ways, while the Trojan War, the battle of Thermopylae, the
Spartans, and Alexander have all been the subjects of recent films.
Last year the New York Times carried a front page story about
"conservatives" taking a "new tack" by establishing "beachheads"
for programs in Western Civilization and American Institutions in
which the ancient Greeks hold pride of place. The contributors to
When Worlds Elide are also invested in having Greek philosophy,
literature, and political theory taken seriously in contemporary
debates-whether over modes of interpreting Plato, Athenian
democracy, gender, ethnicity, or materiality. What distinguishes
this book is the substantive range of the essays in it and the
generative potentialities of "using" ancient authors and events in
analyzing these debates. It begins from the premise that "the
Greeks" (like "the French" or "the Chinese") obscures the contested
histories of ethnic, geographic, and political formations in favor
of an idealized dehistoricized collectivity. The also book also
illustrates the ways in which ancient texts must be understood
within the history of interpretative practices, which means that
"the Greeks" are more a moving target than a stable entity, and
that each generation of interlocutors formulates continually
transforming questions, readings, and arguments. Finally, this book
supposes that an interrogation of "the Greek legacy" depends on
interdisciplinary work where interdisciplinarity functions as a
verb-that is, something that is always in the process of being
achieved.
For better or worse, the ancient Greeks retain their cultural,
political, and philosophical authority for contemporary educators
and actors. Maureen Dowd has talked about the Hellenization of the
Bush administration, Thucydides has been used as a template to
analyze the Iraqi War and the War on Terror, Greek drama has been
repeatedly performed in sometimes spectacular if unconventional
ways, while the Trojan War, the battle of Thermopylae, the
Spartans, and Alexander have all been the subjects of recent films.
Last year the New York Times carried a front page story about
'conservatives' taking a 'new tack' by establishing 'beachheads'
for programs in Western Civilization and American Institutions in
which the ancient Greeks hold pride of place. The contributors to
When Worlds Elide are also invested in having Greek philosophy,
literature, and political theory taken seriously in contemporary
debates-whether over modes of interpreting Plato, Athenian
democracy, gender, ethnicity, or materiality. What distinguishes
this book is the substantive range of the essays in it and the
generative potentialities of 'using' ancient authors and events in
analyzing these debates. It begins from the premise that 'the
Greeks' (like 'the French' or 'the Chinese') obscures the contested
histories of ethnic, geographic, and political formations in favor
of an idealized dehistoricized collectivity. The also book also
illustrates the ways in which ancient texts must be understood
within the history of interpretative practices, which means that
'the Greeks' are more a moving target than a stable entity, and
that each generation of interlocutors formulates continually
transforming questions, readings, and arguments. Finally, this book
supposes that an interrogation of 'the Greek legacy' depends on
interdisciplinary work where interdisciplinarity functions as a
verb-that is, something that is always in the process of being
achieved.
In seminal works such as Go Tell It on the Mountain, Notes of a
Native Son, and The Fire Next Time, acclaimed author and social
critic James Baldwin (1924--1987) expresses his profound belief
that writers have the power to transform society, to engage the
public, and to inspire and channel conversation to achieve lasting
change. While Baldwin is best known for his writings on racial
consciousness and injustice, he is also one of the country's most
eloquent theorists of democratic life and the national psyche. In A
Political Companion to James Baldwin, a group of prominent scholars
assess the prolific author's relevance to present-day political
challenges. Together, they address Baldwin as a democratic
theorist, activist, and citizen, examining his writings on the
civil rights movement, religion, homosexuality, and women's rights.
They investigate the ways in which his work speaks to and
galvanizes a collective American polity, and explore his views on
the political implications of individual experience in relation to
race and gender. This volume not only considers Baldwin's works
within their own historical context, but also applies the author's
insights to recent events such as the Obama presidency and the
Black Lives Matter movement, emphasizing his faith in the
connections between the past and present. These incisive essays
will encourage a new reading of Baldwin that celebrates his
significant contributions to political and democratic theory.
|
|