|
Showing 1 - 6 of
6 matches in All Departments
With the demise of the Soviet Union, Lithuania jumped from a
neo-romantic modernism straight into the postmodern wasteland of
unfettered capitalism. Pensions disappeared along with jobs.
Everything underwent "reform". Everything was for sale. Poetry
audiences went from stadium size to coffee house size. Giddy joy
was followed by disillusion, anxiety, angst. Gintaras Grajauskas's
poetry cannot be understood without this backdrop, for it was here
that he cut his poetic teeth and became a major Lithuanian poet. He
met the jarring changes around him with a wry smile, black humour,
irony - all grounded in respect for the quotidian, the small, the
insignificant. Reading his poems, one can laugh and grind one's
teeth at the same time. We can see the influences of Polish poetry
in the irony and search for meaning in a new cultural landscape. We
can see the rejection of lyrical language for the prosaic, the
pithy. Paradoxical, absurd, witty and observant, Grajauskas
reflects a society that has seemingly lost interest in speaking for
itself, for the whole. The individual is on his/her own. Life is
tough, and to be alive today is to drift in uncertainty, but it is
a human life that cannot sustain itself on cynicism and irony. We
question, we search, and we laugh through the tears, reading his
work, knowing ourselves better.
Ausra Kaziliunaite's poetry has been described as
`post-avant-garde'; she is unafraid to shock readers with her
surreal, ugly-beautiful imagery, alternative form, and regular
resistance to the rigidity of social norms. In The Moon is a Pill,
a collection of the best of Ausra's poetry, translated by Rimas
Uzgiris, the reader discovers the extent of the poet's social
engagement, mixed with a swirl of psychedelia through an
existential lens. As she walks around her city, questioning God,
stalked by an abandoned stuffed bird, finding a grubby child in an
egg, searching for answers in bus stops and windows, her writing is
intimate and personal, yet never reassuring, never fluffy, and
often with a quiet nod to the complex political past of her
country: who can stop you from writing what you want?/ we must
understand that his times were those of censorship/ we now live in
a greenhouse like some kind of tomato... from `Freedom'. The Moon
is a Pill is part of the Parthian Baltic project which will be
launched on time for the London Book Fair 2018. The poetry
collections were launched at the Wheatsheaf Parthian Poetry
Festival in April 2018.
In the post-war period, when most poets in Lithuania were writing
about politics, or when they were focusing their lyricism on the
pastoral, Judita Vaičiūnaitė (1937-2001), without ignoring
either politics or her bonds with nature, became a poet of the
city. Instead of paeans to forest and farm, we find flowers growing
out of cracks on the sidewalks, trees dropping their petals over
garbage heaps, and run-down buildings overcome with a rich
luxuriance of weeds. Instead of tradition-bound country life, we
encounter the cosmopolitan woman discovering herself in cafes,
cramped Soviet apartments, and labyrinthine streets. This thematic
concern is connected to her style of sharp and sudden contrasts and
juxtapositions. Tender lyricism is cut with violence and
foreboding. Randomness, sudden change, and danger form parts of her
poetic experience as much as the beautiful facade, the church
bells, and the cobbled streets. Vaičiūnaitė’s city is also the
locus of her exploration of the modern woman’s identity: single,
educated, working, free. There are poems of love and poems of
struggle against the restraints of a patriarchal world, of
conflicts between the freedom and power to seek her own career path
and the responsibilities of motherhood. Nevertheless,
Vaičiūnaitė did not disconnect herself from her country’s
past, writing lyrical poems from the perspective of historical and
mythological figures. Notably, her personages are often woman. As a
result, the voices of Lithuanian history and myth have never been
richer.
This book takes a new look at the discussion of poetry in Plato's
early dialogues. It argues that Socrates did not believe poets to
be divinely inspired; rather, his treatment of poetry must be
approached from the point of view of two key Socratic concerns: the
nature of desire, and the distinction between techne (science) and
empeiria (a knack). Both point to a radical stance on the nature of
psychological states. Socrates argues that all desire leading to
action is for our own good, so when we act in error about our good,
we do not desire to do what we do. Thus, we don't know what we
desire until we know what is good for us. Since there are no
irrational desires that can lead us to act, to err is to be
ignorant. Therefore, virtue is this techne of knowing what is good
for us. Socrates treats all of our psychological states like
desire: we cannot have knowledge of pleasures, beliefs, or
intentions without knowledge of the reality towards which those
states are directed. So, what a poet means can only be understood
if the subject matter of the poem is understood (by technai).
Accordingly, the knowledge of virtue must primarily be gained
through philosophical dialogue.
|
You may like...
Chaos Walking
Tom Holland, Daisy Ridley, …
DVD
R93
Discovery Miles 930
|