|
Showing 1 - 6 of
6 matches in All Departments
In a career extending over almost six decades, Nicholas Rescher has
conducted researches in almost every principal area of philosophy,
historical and systematic alike. In this extraordinary volume, two
dozen scholars join in offering penetrating discussions of various
facets of Rescher's investigations. The result is an instructively
critical panorama of the many-faceted contributions of this
important American philosopher. Born in Germany in 1928, Nicholas
Rescher came to the U.S. at the age of nine. He is University
Professor of Philosophy at the University of Pittsburgh where he
has also served as Chairman of the Philosophy Department and as
director (and currently chairman) of the Center for Philosophy of
Science. In a productive research career extending over six
decades, he has established himself as a systematic philosopher of
the old style. His work represents a many-sided approach to
fundamental philosophical issues that weaves together threads of
thought from continental idealism and American pragmatism. And
apart from this larger program Rescher has made various specific
contributions to logic (the conception autodescriptive systems of
many-sided logic), the history of logic (the medieval Arabic theory
of modal syllogistic), to the theory of knowledge (epistemetrics as
a quantitative approach in theoretical epistemology), and to the
philosophy of science (the theory of a logarithmic retardation of
scientific progress). Rescher has also worked in the area of
futuristics, and along with Olaf Helmer and Norman Dalkey is
co-inaugurator of the so-called Delphi method of forecasting. Ten
books about Rescher's philosophy have been published in four
languages. Rescher earned his doctorate at Princeton in 1951 while
still at the age of twenty-two-a record for Princeton's Department
of Philosophy. He has served as a President of the American
Philosophical Association, of the American Catholic Philosophy
Association, of the American G. W. Leibniz Society, of the C. S.
Peirce Society, and of the American Metaphysical Society. He was
the founder of the American Philosophical Quarterly. An honorary
member of Corpus Christi College, Oxford, he has been elected to
membership in the European Academy of Arts and Sciences (Academia
Europaea), the Royal Society of Canada, the Institut International
de Philosophie, and several other learned academies. Having held
visiting lectureships at Oxford, Constance, Salamanca, Munich, and
Marburg, he has been awarded fellowships by the Ford, Guggenheim,
and National Science Foundations. Author of some hundred books
ranging over many areas of philosophy, over a dozen of them
translated from English into other languages, he is the recipient
of eight honorary degrees from universities on three continents. He
was awarded the Alexander von Humboldt Prize for Humanistic
Scholarship in 1984, the Belgian Prix Mercier in 2005, and the
Aquinas Medal of the American Catholic Philosophical Association in
2007.
In Human Cloning a panel of distinguished philosophers, medical
ethicists, religious thinkers, and social critics tackle the thorny
problems raised by the now real possibility of human cloning. In
their wide ranging reviews, the distinguished contributors
critically examine the major arguments for and against human
cloning, probe the implications of such a procedure for society,
and critically evaluate the "Report and Recommendations of the
National Bioethics Advisory Commission." The debate includes both
religious and secular arguments, as well as an outline of the
history of the cloning debate and a discussion of human cloning's
impact on our sense of self and our beliefs about the meaning of
life.
Robert Almeder provides a comprehensive discussion and definitive
refutation of our common conception of truth as a necessary
condition for knowledge of the world, and to defend in detail an
epistemic conception of truth without falling into the usual
epistemological relativism or classical idealism in which all
properties of the world turn out to be linguistic in nature and
origin. There is no other book available that clearly and
thoroughly defends the case for an epistemic conception of truth
and also claims success in avoiding idealism or epistemological
relativism.
In Human Cloning a panel of distinguished philosophers, medical
ethicists, religious thinkers, and social critics tackle the thorny
problems raised by the now real possibility of human cloning. In
their wide ranging reviews, the distinguished contributors
critically examine the major arguments for and against human
cloning, probe the implications of such a procedure for society,
and critically evaluate the "Report and Recommendations of the
National Bioethics Advisory Commission." The debate includes both
religious and secular arguments, as well as an outline of the
history of the cloning debate and a discussion of human cloning's
impact on our sense of self and our beliefs about the meaning of
life.
In seeking to defend a form of naturalism that avoids both
scientism and the reduction of philosophy to science, Robert
Almeder defines philosophy and distinguishes it from the domain of
natural science by showing how a good philosophical explanation,
while empirically testable, differs from a good scientific
explanation.
|
You may like...
Loot
Nadine Gordimer
Paperback
(2)
R383
R318
Discovery Miles 3 180
|