|
Showing 1 - 19 of
19 matches in All Departments
Adam Smith and the Philosophy of Law and Economics is a unique
book. Malloy and Evensky bring together a team of international and
interdisciplinary scholars to address the work of Adam Smith as it
relates to law and economics. In addition to their own
contributions, the book includes works by Dr. John W. Cairns of the
University of Edinburgh, Dr. J. Ralph Lindgren of Lehigh
University, Professor Kenneth A.B. Mackinnon of the University of
Waikato, and the Honorable Richard A. Posner of the United States
Circuit Court of Appeals. Together these authors bring expertise
from the areas of law, philosophy, history, economics, and law and
economics to a new study of Adam Smith and his work. Part One of
the book presents new and important observations on Smith's views
on community, ethics, the court system, criminal law, and delictual
or tort law liability. In this part of the book Smith's work is
also examined from the perspective of his use as persuasive
authority in the works of modern legal economists. In Part Two the
'living Smith' is explored by way of a debate between two major
contributors in the field of law and economics. The debate and its
analysis create a unique and contemporary opportunity to study
Smith as a foundational source in the midst of a current academic
and social policy dispute. The understanding of Adam Smith that
emerges from this book is new and complex. It will challenge the
one-dimensional portrayals of Smith as a promoter of self-interest
and it will correct many of the misinterpretations of Smith that
are currently fashionable in the worlds of law and economics and
the philosophy of law.
Creativity, Law and Entrepreneurship addresses the relationship
between law (institutions and regulations) and entrepreneurship
(human activity with the aim of creating something new). Human
activity is the essence of entrepreneurship. What unites law and
creativity, work and play, is their shared origins in this
activity. In this book, a varied group of scholars examine the
building blocks of entrepreneurship by not only addressing the
legal institutions that might regulate and promote enterprise, but
by also exploring the very idea of creativity. The contributions to
this volume provide a set of guideposts for understanding the
connections among law, markets and human activities. They include
chapters on: empirical evidence about creativity in the realm of
patent, copyright, and trademark; exploration of our understanding
of the transition from physical work to the mental work of
inventing and creating and; examination of the legal process of
patenting, contracting and transacting more generally.
Collectively, the book explores the meanings and functions of
creativity, and the role of law and legal institutions in promoting
and sustaining entrepreneurial activity. Scholars, students and
practitioners in entrepreneurship, law and the wide range of fields
that are interested in, and benefit from, creative human activity
will find this volume illuminating. Contributors include: M.M.
Carpenter, D.R. Desai, S. Ghosh, S.J.H. Graham, C.B. Graber, R.S.
Gruner, D. Halbert, S.A. Hetcher, M.J. Madison, R.P. Malloy, S.M. O
Connor, T. Sichelman
In Law in a Market Context Robin Paul Malloy examines the way in
which people, as social beings, experience the intersection of law,
markets, and culture. His work recognizes that experience varies by
such characteristics as culture, race, gender, age, and class,
among others. Thus, market analysis must account for these
variations. Through case examples, illustrative fact patterns, and
problems based on hypothetical situations he demonstrates the
implications and the ambiguities of law in a market society. In his
analysis he provides a complete and accessible introduction to a
vast array of economic terms, concepts, and ideas - making this
book a valuable primer for anyone interested in understanding the
use of market concepts in legal reasoning.
The contributors in this volume address the fundamental
relationship between the state and its citizens, and among the
people themselves. Discussion centers on a recent decision by the
United States Supreme Court in the case of Kelo v. City of New
London. This case involved the use of eminent domain power to
acquire private property for purposes of transferring it by the
State to another private party that would make "better" economic
use of the land. This type of state action has been identified as
an "economic development taking". In the Kelo case, the Court held
that the action was legal within provisions of the US Constitution
but the opinion was contentious among some of the Justices and has
been met with significant negative outcry from the public. The Kelo
case and the public debate arising in its aftermath give cause to
assess the legal landscape related to the ability of government to
fairly balance the tension between private property and the public
interest. The tension and the need to successfully strike a balance
are not unique to any one country or any one political system. From
the United States to the United Kingdom, to the People's Republic
of China, property and its legal regulation are of prime importance
to matters of economic development and civic institution building.
The Kelo decision, therefore, explores a rich set of legal
principles with broad applicability.
What, exactly, is private property? Or, to ask the question another
way, what rights to intrude does the public have in what is
generally accepted as private property? The answer, perhaps
surprisingly to some, is that the public has not only a significant
interest in regulating the use of private property but also in
defining it, and establishing its contour and texture. In The
Public Nature of Private Property, therefore, scholars from the
United States and the United Kingdom challenge traditional
conceptions of private property while presenting a range of views
on both the meaning of private property, and on the ability, some
might say the requirement, of the state to regulate it.
With distressing statistics about rising cost burdens, increasing
foreclosure rates, rising unemployment, falling wages, and
widespread homelessness, building affordable housing is one of our
most pressing social policy problems. Affordable Housing and
Public-Private Partnerships focuses attention on this critical
need, as leading experts on affordable housing law and policy come
together to address key issues of concern and to suggest
appropriate responses for future action. Focusing in particular on
how best to understand and implement the joint work of public and
private actors in housing, this book considers the real estate
aspects of affordable housing law and policy, access to housing,
housing finance and affordability, land use, housing regulation and
housing issues in a post-Katrina context. Filling a critical gap in
the scholarly literature available, this book will be of particular
interest to policy-makers, academics, lawyers and students of
housing, land use, real estate, property, community development and
urban planning
What, exactly, is private property? Or, to ask the question another
way, what rights to intrude does the public have in what is
generally accepted as private property? The answer, perhaps
surprisingly to some, is that the public has not only a significant
interest in regulating the use of private property but also in
defining it, and establishing its contour and texture. In The
Public Nature of Private Property, therefore, scholars from the
United States and the United Kingdom challenge traditional
conceptions of private property while presenting a range of views
on both the meaning of private property, and on the ability, some
might say the requirement, of the state to regulate it.
With distressing statistics about rising cost burdens, increasing
foreclosure rates, rising unemployment, falling wages, and
widespread homelessness, building affordable housing is one of our
most pressing social policy problems. Affordable Housing and
Public-Private Partnerships focuses attention on this critical
need, as leading experts on affordable housing law and policy come
together to address key issues of concern and to suggest
appropriate responses for future action. Focusing in particular on
how best to understand and implement the joint work of public and
private actors in housing, this book considers the real estate
aspects of affordable housing law and policy, access to housing,
housing finance and affordability, land use, housing regulation and
housing issues in a post-Katrina context. Filling a critical gap in
the scholarly literature available, this book will be of particular
interest to policy-makers, academics, lawyers and students of
housing, land use, real estate, property, community development and
urban planning
The contributors in this volume address the fundamental
relationship between the state and its citizens, and among the
people themselves. Discussion centers on a recent decision by the
United States Supreme Court in the case of Kelo v. City of New
London. This case involved the use of eminent domain power to
acquire private property for purposes of transferring it by the
State to another private party that would make "better" economic
use of the land. This type of state action has been identified as
an "economic development taking". In the Kelo case, the Court held
that the action was legal within provisions of the US Constitution
but the opinion was contentious among some of the Justices and has
been met with significant negative outcry from the public. The Kelo
case and the public debate arising in its aftermath give cause to
assess the legal landscape related to the ability of government to
fairly balance the tension between private property and the public
interest. The tension and the need to successfully strike a balance
are not unique to any one country or any one political system. From
the United States to the United Kingdom, to the People's Republic
of China, property and its legal regulation are of prime importance
to matters of economic development and civic institution building.
The Kelo decision, therefore, explores a rich set of legal
principles with broad applicability.
In August of 2005, Hurricane Katrina hit the Gulf Coast of the
United States, directly affecting 1.5 million people. Only one year
earlier, an Indian Ocean tsunami struck Indonesia, destroying or
damaging more than 370,000 homes. As forces of nature, hurricanes,
tsunamis, earthquakes and floods are not limited to occurrences in
any one community or any one country. In Law and Recovery from
Disaster: Hurricane Katrina, attention is focused on the ability of
law and legal institutions to not only survive such disasters but
to effectively facilitate recovery. Using Hurricane Katrina as a
lens, contributors address a wide range of issues of interest to
people concerned about property law, disaster preparedness,
housing, insurance, small business recovery, land use planning and
the needs of people with disabilities. While Hurricane Katrina is
the focal point for discussion, the lessons learned are readily
applicable to a variety of disaster situations in a wide range of
global settings.
A contemporary interpretation of Adam Smith's work on
jurisprudence, revealing Smith's belief that progress emerges from
cooperation and a commitment to justice. In Smith's theory, the
tension between self-interest and the interests of others is
mediated by law, so that the common interest of the community can
be promoted. Moreover, Smith informs us that successful societies
do at least three things well. They promote the common interest,
advance justice through the rule of law, and they facilitate our
natural desire to truck, barter, and exchange. In this process, law
functions as an invisible force that holds society together and
keeps it operating smoothly and productively. Law enhances social
cooperation, facilitates trade, and extends the market. In these
ways, law functions like Adam Smith's invisible hand, guiding and
facilitating the progress of humankind.
A contemporary interpretation of Adam Smith's work on
jurisprudence, revealing Smith's belief that progress emerges from
cooperation and a commitment to justice. In Smith's theory, the
tension between self-interest and the interests of others is
mediated by law, so that the common interest of the community can
be promoted. Moreover, Smith informs us that successful societies
do at least three things well. They promote the common interest,
advance justice through the rule of law, and they facilitate our
natural desire to truck, barter, and exchange. In this process, law
functions as an invisible force that holds society together and
keeps it operating smoothly and productively. Law enhances social
cooperation, facilitates trade, and extends the market. In these
ways, law functions like Adam Smith's invisible hand, guiding and
facilitating the progress of humankind.
In Land Use Law and Disability, Robin Paul Malloy argues that our
communities need better planning in order to be safely and easily
navigated by people with mobility impairment and to facilitate
intergenerational aging in place. To achieve this, communities will
need to think of mobility impairment and inclusive design as land
use and planning issues, in addition to understanding them as
matters of civil and constitutional rights. Although much has been
written about the rights of people with disabilities, little has
been said about the interplay between disability and land use
regulation. This book undertakes to explain mobility impairment, as
one type of disability, in terms of planning and zoning. The goal
is to advance our understanding of disability in terms of planning
and zoning in order to facilitate cooperative engagement between
disability rights advocates and land use professionals. This in
turn should lead to improved community planning for accessibility
and aging in place.
This integrated study of law, economics and Peircian semiotics re-examines the relationship between law and market theory, and introduces the idea of law and market economy. Overcoming the traditional dichotomy between efficiency and justice, Malloy focuses on the relationship between creativity and sustainable wealth formation. He shows how creativity and sustainable wealth formation have more to do with an ethic of social responsibility than with a concern for economic efficiency. In presenting his case, Malloy uses numerous examples as he reinterprets classic problems related to rational choice, the Coase Theorem, public choice, efficient breach, social contract theory, and wealth maximization, among others.
The essays selected for this volume highlight the contributions of
Adam Smith to our understanding of law and jurisprudence. The
collection provides a detailed and overarching analysis of Smith's
work related to law and shows how Smith connected jurisprudence to
moral philosophy and to economics. In this regard, the volume is
unique and stands out in comparison to the many books which explore
Smith's contributions to economics. Contributions to this volume
form the core of an essential research collection on Adam Smith and
law by reproducing key works of scholarship in a form that permits
the user to authoritatively cite the original publications;
maintaining the original pagination and references.
In Land Use Law and Disability, Robin Paul Malloy argues that our
communities need better planning to be safely and easily navigated
by people with mobility impairment and to facilitate
intergenerational aging in place. To achieve this, communities will
need to think of mobility impairment and inclusive design as land
use and planning issues, in addition to understanding them as
matters of civil and constitutional rights. Although much has been
written about the rights of people with disabilities, little has
been said about the interplay between disability and land use
regulation. This book undertakes to explain mobility impairment, as
one type of disability, in terms of planning and zoning. The goal
is to advance our understanding of disability in terms of planning
and zoning to facilitate cooperative engagement between disability
rights advocates and land use professionals. This in turn should
lead to improved community planning for accessibility and aging in
place.
In Law in a Market Context Robin Paul Malloy examines the way in
which people, as social beings, experience the intersection of law,
markets, and culture. His work recognizes that experience varies by
such characteristics as culture, race, gender, age, and class,
among others. Thus, market analysis must account for these
variations. Through case examples, illustrative fact patterns, and
problems based on hypothetical situations he demonstrates the
implications and the ambiguities of law in a market society. In his
analysis he provides a complete and accessible introduction to a
vast array of economic terms, concepts, and ideas - making this
book a valuable primer for anyone interested in understanding the
use of market concepts in legal reasoning.
This integrated study of law, economics and Peircian semiotics re-examines the relationship between law and market theory, and introduces the idea of law and market economy. Overcoming the traditional dichotomy between efficiency and justice, Malloy focuses on the relationship between creativity and sustainable wealth formation. He shows how creativity and sustainable wealth formation have more to do with an ethic of social responsibility than with a concern for economic efficiency. In presenting his case, Malloy uses numerous examples as he reinterprets classic problems related to rational choice, the Coase Theorem, public choice, efficient breach, social contract theory, and wealth maximization, among others.
|
|