|
|
Showing 1 - 25 of
48 matches in All Departments
The diminishment of Arctic sea ice has led to increased human
activities in the Arctic, and has heightened interest in, and
concerns about, the region's future. The United States, by virtue
of Alaska, is an Arctic country and has substantial interests in
the region. On January 12, 2009, the George W. Bush Administration
released a presidential directive, called National Security
Presidential Directive 66/Homeland Security Presidential Directive
25 (NSPD 66/HSPD 25), establishing a new U.S. policy for the Arctic
region.
The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) is a relatively inexpensive Navy
surface combatant equipped with modular plug-and-fight mission
packages. The basic version of the LCS, without any mission
packages, is referred to as the LCS sea frame. The Navy wants to
field a force of 55 LCSs. The first two (LCS-1 and LCS-2) were
procured in FY2005 and FY2006 and were commissioned into service on
November 8, 2008, and January 16, 2010. Another two (LCS-3 and
LCS-4) were procured in FY2009 and are under construction. Two more
(LCS-5 and LCS-6) were procured in FY2010. The Navy's FY2011-FY2015
shipbuilding plan calls for procuring 17 more LCSs in annual
quantities of 2, 3, 4, 4, and 4. The Navy's proposed FY2011 budget
requests $1,231.0 million in procurement funding for the two LCSs
that the Navy wants to procure in FY2011, and $278.4 million in
FY2011 advance procurement funding for the 11 LCSs that the Navy
wants to procure in FY2012-FY2014. The Navy's proposed FY2011
budget also requests procurement funding to procure LCS mission
packages, LCS module weapons, and research and development funding
for the LCS program. There are currently two very different LCS
designs--one developed and produced by an industry team led by ...
This report presents policy and oversight issues for Congress
arising from (1) maritime territorial disputes involving China in
the South China Sea (SCS) and East China Sea (ECS) and (2) an
additional dispute over whether China has a right under
international law to regulate U.S. and other foreign military
activities in its 200-nautical-mile maritime Exclusive Economic
Zone (EEZ). China is a party to multiple maritime territorial
disputes in the SCS and ECS, including, in particular, disputes
over the Paracel Islands, Spratly Islands, and Scarborough Shoal in
the SCS, and the Senkaku Islands in the ECS. Maritime territorial
disputes involving China in the SCS and ECS date back many years,
and have periodically led to incidents and periods of increased
tension. The disputes have again intensified in the past few years,
leading to numerous confrontations and incidents, and heightened
tensions between China and other countries in the region,
particularly Japan, the Philippines, and Vietnam. In addition to
maritime territorial disputes in the SCS and ECS, China is involved
in a dispute, particularly with the United States, over whether
China has a right under international law to regulate the
activities of foreign military forces operating within China's EEZ.
The dispute appears to ...
The planned size of the Navy, the rate of Navy ship procurement,
and the prospective affordability of the Navy's shipbuilding plans
have been matters of concern for the congressional defense
committees for the past several years. In February 2006, the Navy
presented to Congress a goal of achieving and maintaining a fleet
of 313 ships, consisting of certain types and quantities of ships.
On March 28, 2012, the Department of Defense (DOD) submitted to
Congress an FY2013 30-year (FY2013-FY2042) shipbuilding plan that
includes a new goal for a fleet of about 310-316 ships. The Navy is
conducting a force structure assessment, to be completed later this
year, that could lead to a refinement of this 310- 316 ship
plan.The planned size of the Navy, the rate of Navy ship
procurement, and the prospective affordability of the Navy's
shipbuilding plans have been matters of concern for the
congressional defense committees for the past several years. In
February 2006, the Navy presented to Congress a goal of achieving
and maintaining a fleet of 313 ships, consisting of certain types
and quantities of ships. On March 28, 2012, the Department of
Defense (DOD) submitted to Congress an FY2013 30-year
(FY2013-FY2042) shipbuilding plan that includes a new goal for a
fleet of about 310-316 ships. The Navy is conducting a force
structure assessment, to be completed later this year, that could
lead to a refinement of this 310- 316 ship plan.
The Navy's FY2013 budget submission calls for procuring nine
Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) class destroyers in FY2013-FY2017, in annual
quantities of 2-1-2-2-2. The five DDG-51s scheduled for procurement
in FY2013-FY2015, and one of the two scheduled for procurement in
FY2016, are to be of the current Flight IIA design. The Navy wants
to begin procuring a new version of the DDG-51 design, called the
Flight III design, starting with the second of the two ships
scheduled for procurement in FY2016. The two DDG-51s scheduled for
procurement in FY2017 are also to be of the Flight III design. The
Flight III design is to feature a new and more capable radar called
the Air and Missile Defense Radar (AMDR). The Navy this year is
requesting congressional approval to use a multiyear procurement
(MYP) arrangement for the nine DDG-51s scheduled for procurement in
FY2013-FY2017.
Some officials of the Islamic Republic of Iran have recently
renewed threats to close or exercise control over the Strait of
Hormuz. Iran's threats appear to have been prompted by the likely
imposition of new multilateral sanctions targeting Iran's economic
lifeline-the export of oil and other energy products. In the past,
Iranian leaders have made similar threats and comments when the
country's oil exports have been threatened. However, as in the
past, the prospect of a major disruption of maritime traffic in the
Strait risks damaging Iranian interests. U.S. and allied military
capabilities in the region remain formidable. This makes a
prolonged outright closure of the Strait appear unlikely.
Nevertheless, such threats can and do raise tensions in global
energy markets and leave the United States and other global oil
consumers to consider the risks of another potential conflict in
the Middle East. This report explains Iranian threats to the Strait
of Hormuz, and analyzes the implications of some scenarios for
potential U.S. or international conflict with Iran. These scenarios
include: (1) Outright Closure. An outright closure of the Strait of
Hormuz, a major artery of the global oil market, would be an
unprecedented disruption of global oil supply and contribute to
higher global oil prices. However, at present, this appears to be a
low probability event. Were this to occur, it is not likely to be
prolonged. It would likely trigger a military response from the
United States and others, which could reach beyond simply
reestablishing Strait transit. Iran would also alienate countries
that currently oppose broader oil sanctions. Iran could become more
likely to actually pursue this if few or no countries were willing
to import its oil. (2) Harassment and/or Infrastructure Damage.
Iran could harass tanker traffic through the Strait through a range
of measures without necessarily shutting down all traffic. This
took place during the Iran-Iraq war in the 1980s. Also, critical
energy production and export infrastructure could be damaged as a
result of military action by Iran, the United States, or other
actors. Harassment or infrastructure damage could contribute to
lower exports of oil from the Persian Gulf, greater uncertainty
around oil supply, higher shipping costs, and consequently higher
oil prices. However, harassment also runs the risk of triggering a
military response and alienating Iran's remaining oil customers.
(3) Continued Threats. Iranian officials could continue to make
threatening statements without taking action. This could still
raise energy market tensions and contribute to higher oil prices,
though only to the degree that oil market participants take such
threats seriously. If an oil disruption does occur, the United
States has the option of temporarily offsetting its effects through
the release of oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. Such
action could be coordinated with other countries that hold
strategic reserves, as was done with other members of the
International Energy Agency after the disruption of Libyan crude
supplies in 2011. Iran's threats suggest to many experts that
international and multilateral sanctions-and the prospect of
additional sanctions-have begun to affect its political and
strategic calculations. The threats have been coupled with a
publicly announced agreement by Iran to resume talks with six
countries on measures that would assure the international community
that Iran's nuclear program is used for purely peaceful purposes.
Some experts believe that the pressure on Iran's economy, and its
agreement to renewed talks, provide the best opportunity in at
least two years to reach agreement with Iran on curbing its nuclear
program.
The term Deepwater referred to more than a dozen separate Coast
Guard acquisition programs for replacing and modernizing the
service's aging fleet of deepwater-capable ships and aircraft.
Until April 2007, the Coast Guard pursued these programs as a
single, integrated acquisition program that was known as the
Integrated Deepwater System (IDS) program or Deepwater program for
short. Since April 2007, the Coast Guard has pursued them as
separate acquisition programs. These acquisition programs include
plans for, among other things, 91 new cutters, 124 new small boats,
and 247 new or modernized airplanes, helicopters, and unmanned
aerial vehicles (UAVs).
The Navy is currently procuring one Virginia (SSN-774) class attack
nuclearpowered submarine (SSN) per year. Each submarine currently
costs about $2.4 billion. The FY2007-FY2011 Future Years Defense
Plan (FYDP) to be submitted in February 2006 reportedly will
propose maintaining the one-per-year procurement rate through
FY2011, and then increasing the rate to two per year in FY2012. As
of the end of FY2005, the Navy totaled 282 ships, including 54
SSNs. In December 2005, it was reported that the Navy is planning
to maintain future fleet of 313 ships, including 48 SSNs. Submarine
supporters are concerned that the Navy and DOD are not placing
adequate emphasis on attack submarines in Navy forcestructure
planning and ship-procurement plans. Issues for Congress include
the following: What should the attack submarine force-level goal
be? At what rate should Virginia-class submarines be procured in
coming years? Congress's decisions on these issues could
significantly affect future Navy capabilities, Navy funding
requirements, and the submarine industrial base. In considering
what the attack submarine force-level goal should be, key factors
to consider include day-to-day demands for attack submarines,
potential wartime demands for attack submarines, submarine-launched
unmanned vehicles (UVs), attack submarine homeporting and crewing
arrangements, the Trident cruise missile submarine ...
The F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF), also called the Lighting II,
is a new strike fighter being procured in different versions by the
Air Force, Marine Corps, and Navy. The F-35 program is the
Department of Defenses (DODs) largest weapon procurement program in
terms of total estimated acquisition cost. Current DOD plans call
for acquiring a total of 2,456 JSFs for the Air Force, Marine
Corps, and Navy at an estimated total acquisition cost (as of
December 31, 2007) of about $246 billion in constant (i.e.,
inflation-adjusted) FY2009 dollars. Procurement of F-35s began in
FY2007. Hundreds of additional F-35s are to be purchased by several
U.S. allies. The administrations proposed FY2010 defense budget
requests a total of about $10.4 billion in Air Force and Navy
research and development funding and procurement funding for the
F-35 program, including about $3.6 billion in Air Force and Navy
research and development funding and about $6.8 billion in Air
Force and Navy procurement funding. The proposed FY2010 budget
would fund the procurement of 10 F-35As for the Air Force, 16
F-35Bs for the Marine Corps, and four F-35Cs for the Navy. The
administrations proposed FY2010 defense budget also proposes to
terminate the F-35 alternate ...
|
|