|
|
Showing 1 - 5 of
5 matches in All Departments
There is a moral to this book, a bit of Confucian wisdom often
ignored in social network analysis: "Worry not that no one knows
you, seek to be worth knowing."
This advice is contrary to the usual social network emphasis on
securing relations with well-connected people. Neighbor Networks
examines the cases of analysts, bankers, and managers, and finds
that rewards, in fact, do go to people with well-connected
colleagues. Look around your organization. The individuals doing
well tend to be affiliated with well-connected colleagues.
However, the advantage obvious to the naked eye is misleading. It
disappears when an individual's own characteristics are held
constant. Well-connected people do not have to affiliate with
people who have nothing to offer. This book shows that affiliation
with well-connected people adds stability but no advantage to a
person's own connections. Advantage is concentrated in people who
are themselves well connected.
This book is a trail of argument and evidence that leads to the
conclusion that individuals make a lot of their own network
advantage. The social psychology of networks moves to center stage
and personal responsibility emerges as a key theme. In the end, the
social is affirmed, but with an emphasis on individual agency and
the social psychology of networks. The research gives new emphasis
to Coleman's initial image of social capital as a forcing function
for human capital.
This book is for academics and researchers of organizational and
network studies interested in a new angle on familiar data, and as
a supplemental reading in graduate courses on social networks,
stratification, or organizations. A variety of research settings
are studied, and diverse theoretical perspectives are taken. The
book's argument and evidence are supported by ample appendices for
readers interested in background details.
There is a moral to this book, a bit of Confucian wisdom often
ignored in social network analysis: "Worry not that no one knows
you, seek to be worth knowing."
This advice is contrary to the usual social network emphasis on
securing relations with well-connected people. Neighbor Networks
examines the cases of analysts, bankers, and managers, and finds
that rewards, in fact, do go to people with well-connected
colleagues. Look around your organization. The individuals doing
well tend to be affiliated with well-connected colleagues.
However, the advantage obvious to the naked eye is misleading. It
disappears when an individual's own characteristics are held
constant. Well-connected people do not have to affiliate with
people who have nothing to offer. This book shows that affiliation
with well-connected people adds stability but no advantage to a
person's own connections. Advantage is concentrated in people who
are themselves well connected.
This book is a trail of argument and evidence that leads to the
conclusion that individuals make a lot of their own network
advantage. The social psychology of networks moves to center stage
and personal responsibility emerges as a key theme. In the end, the
social is affirmed, but with an emphasis on individual agency and
the social psychology of networks. The research gives new emphasis
to Coleman's initial image of social capital as a forcing function
for human capital.
This book is for academics and researchers of organizational and
network studies interested in a new angle on familiar data, and as
a supplemental reading in graduate courses on social networks,
stratification, or organizations. A variety of research settings
are studied, and diverse theoretical perspectives are taken. The
book's argument and evidence are supported by ample appendices for
readers interested in background details.
Trust, Reputation and Competitive Advantage, presents the three critical and all important elements for maintaining competitive success in today's business environment. The author, known for his work in network analysis explains the network structure of competition and the role of network entrepreneurs.
Social Capital, the advantage created by location in social
structure, is a critical element in business strategy. Who has it,
how it works, and how to develop it have become key questions as
markets, organizations, and careers become more and more dependent
on informal, discretionary relationships. The formal organization
deals with accountability; Everything else flows through the
informal: advice, coordination, cooperation friendship, gossip,
knowledge, trust. Informal relations have always been with us, they
have always mattered. What is new is the range of activities in
which they now matter, and the emerging clarity we have about how
they create advantage for certain people at the expense of others.
This is done by brokerage and closure. Ronald S. Burt builds upon
his celebrated work in this area to explore the nature of brokerage
and closure. Brokerage is the activity of people who live at the
intersection of social worlds, who have a vision advantage of
seeing and developing good ideas, an advantage which can be seen in
their compensation, recognition, and the responsibility they're
entrusted with in comparison to their peers. Closure is the
tightening of coordination in a closed network of people, and
people who do this do well as a complement to brokers because of
the trust and alignment they create. Brokerage and Closure explores
how these elements work together to define social capital, showing
how in the business world reputation has come to replace authority,
pursued opportunity assignment, and reward has come to be
associated with achieving competitive advantage in a social order
of continuous disequilibrium.
Ronald Burt describes the social structural theory of
competition that has developed through the last two decades. The
contrast between perfect competition and monopoly is replaced with
a network model of competition. The basic element in this account
is the structural hole: a gap between two individuals with
complementary resources or information. When the two are connected
through a third individual as entrepreneur, the gap is filled,
creating important advantages for the entrepreneur. Competitive
advantage is a matter of access to structural holes in relation to
market transactions.
|
|